"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be > > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a > > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :) > Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave the > kernel bits in the tree. Since all this stuff depends on being in sync, > the only reasonable way to do this is to put it in the tree.
Why? What kernel code does this need? --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
