On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
>
> The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs
> because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest
> of it could be a port I think :)
Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this
means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs
and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port.
Other thoughts ?
--
Boris Popov
http://www.butya.kz/~bp/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
