"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote: > > > mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs > > > ncplogin - creates permanent connection to a NetWare server > > > without an actual mount, > > > ncplogout - destroy permanent connection, > > > ncplist - displays various information about client itself > > > and NetWare servers, > > > ncprint - allows to send job to NetWare printer, > > > ncpsend - sends message to NetWare user or server console, > > > ncplpd - simple NetWare print server, > > > ncpurge - purge specified salvagable files, > > > ncpsvc - remote control for a NetWare server, > > > ncpasswd - allows to change password for a NetWare user. > > > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be > > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a > > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :) > > Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave the > kernel bits in the tree. Since all this stuff depends on being in sync, > the only reasonable way to do this is to put it in the tree.
Or having mount_nfs in the base but moving nfsd/nfsiod/nfsstat to ports. :-) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - pe...@freebsd.org; pe...@yahoo-inc.com; pe...@netplex.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
