On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be > > > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a > > > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :) > > Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave the > > kernel bits in the tree. Since all this stuff depends on being in sync, > > the only reasonable way to do this is to put it in the tree. > > Why? What kernel code does this need?
The ncpfs kernel code for one. We're talking about less than 500k of code here. You want to take the anti-bloatist stance you'll have to do better than that. Try libreadline for starters. :) -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | win...@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
