On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this
> > means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs
> > and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port.
> >
> > Other thoughts ?
>
> I'm really not sure I see the value in splitting it up like that.. Are
> things like ncplogin required to support mount_nwfs? Personally, I think
> it might be better to take the whole lot and later on (nearer 4.0 time)
> decide if it's worth splitting the ncp* off to a port if it's worth doing.
> Otherwise version skew is going to be a hassle while it's under
> development.
Thats why I suggested an original scheme...
--
Boris Popov
http://www.butya.kz/~bp/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
