> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be > > mount_nwfs > > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the > > rest > > of it could be a port I think :) > > Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this > means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs > and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port.
You could still build the KLD as a port, actually. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ [email protected] \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ [email protected] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
