> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> 
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> > 
> > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs
> > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest
> > of it could be a port I think :)
> 
>       Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this 
> means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs
> and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port.

You could still build the KLD as a port, actually.

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to