Re: %PRODUCTNAME

On 4/15/13 1:42 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Am 15.04.13 13:34, schrieb Rob Weir: >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >> wrote: >> >>> On 4/15/13 12:22 PM, janI wrote: >>>> On 15 April 2013 11:53, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>>>

Re: %PRODUCTNAME

On 4/15/13 2:10 PM, janI wrote: > On 15 April 2013 13:50, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/15/13 1:42 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> Am 15.04.13 13:34, schrieb Rob Weir: >>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >>>> wrote: >>>>

Re: [DEVTOOLS] [PROPOSAL] branch Netbeans plugin for 3.0 and begin 4.0 trunk

On 4/15/13 2:12 PM, janI wrote: > On 15 April 2013 11:22, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/15/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote: >>> On 15 April 2013 00:23, Carl Marcum wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Jan, >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/14/20

[RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots

Hi, I noticed feedback regarding sidebar problems that can't be reproduced. It seems that the result of the build bots are not reliable. Based on this and the fact that we don't have build bots for MacOS and currently not for Linunx 32 bit, I propose a weekly developer snapshot based on the SNAPS

Re: [DEVTOOLS] [PROPOSAL] branch Netbeans plugin for 3.0 and begin 4.0 trunk

On 4/15/13 3:36 PM, janI wrote: > On 15 April 2013 15:31, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/15/13 2:12 PM, janI wrote: >>> On 15 April 2013 11:22, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/15/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote: >>>>> On 15

Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots

On 4/15/13 4:14 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:56:50PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed feedback regarding sidebar problems that can't be >> reproduced. It seems that the result of the build bots are not >>

Re: Clean build proposal

On 4/16/13 9:42 AM, Herbert Dürr wrote: > On 2013/04/16 9:12 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: >> On 15.04.2013 18:12, Herbert Dürr wrote: >>> On 2013/04/15 4:00 PM, Andre Fischer wrote: I would like to change the build type of the Windows7 nightly build from incremental to clean. R

[CODE]: regression, Python won't work on MacOS

Hi, during my work on the 3layer drop I noticed that Python don't work on MacOSX. I thought it is a problem with my work but a cross check with the trunk version showed that it is broken on trunk as well :-( The first problem I notice is that in pythonloader.py and uno.py the syntax for excpetion

Re: [CODE]: consolidating of several directories -> looking for a volunteer

On 4/5/13 3:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > today we have several modules who do something with UNO types > > udkapi -> contains UNO txpes for the URE > offapi -> contains the UNO types for the office > ridljar -> generate the class files for the types of u

Re: [CODE]: consolidating of several directories -> looking for a volunteer

On 4/16/13 11:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/5/13 3:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> today we have several modules who do something with UNO types >> >> udkapi -> contains UNO txpes for the URE >> offapi -> contains the UNO types for the

Re: [CODE]: regression, Python won't work on MacOS

On 4/16/13 11:16 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > during my work on the 3layer drop I noticed that Python don't work on > MacOSX. I thought it is a problem with my work but a cross check with > the trunk version showed that it is broken on trunk as well :-( > > The

Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots

On 4/15/13 4:38 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/15/13 4:14 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:56:50PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed feedback regarding sidebar problems that can't be >>> reproduc

Re: [CODE]: regression, Python won't work on MacOS

On 4/16/13 3:31 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:16:16AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> during my work on the 3layer drop I noticed that Python don't >> work on MacOSX. I thought it is a problem with

Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots

On 4/16/13 3:59 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:46:10AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> MacOS and Windows snapshot builds are uploaded. Keep in mind that >> it is a build with system integration. >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/d

Re: "ccache" for Java?

On 4/16/13 4:47 PM, Claudio Filho wrote: > Hi > > > Speaking with java developers, they spoke about Maven or use some parameter > in ANT, for reuse compiled objects. I understand that have the same effect > - speed up the build. > > Someone knows about this topic? no and we don't use maven in o

Re: [RELEASE]: weekly developer snapshots

On 4/17/13 10:13 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote: > Juergen , Ariel and all, > Thanks so much for your great work to have the 4.0 developer snapshot > ready! > According to the 4.0 > plan, > the next step should be start the

[CODE]: useless teste.txt file in svn

Hi, I notice a new file in trunk/teste.txt which seems to be a test file. Can I propose that we don't check in such files please and that this file gets removed. Thanks Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffi

Re: [CODE]: useless teste.txt file in svn

On 4/17/13 1:29 PM, Albino B Neto wrote: > 2013/4/17 Jürgen Schmidt : >> I notice a new file in trunk/teste.txt which seems to be a test file. > > The file removed. ;-) perfect ;-) And don't get me wrong testing is fine but we should be careful with checking in useless file

[CODE]: obsolete binfilter module deleted

Hi, just a short notice that I have deleted the obsolete binfilter module from svn. I think Ariel has disabled the filters some time ago and Pavel did some further necessary preparation to get rid of binfilter. I finally have deleted the binfilter now from svn. This will help all people who work

[CODE]: 3layer drop part 1 is integrated

Hi, a further notice for you. I have integrated the first chunk of changes to get rid of the 3layer. I would like to include these change in the QA process during the regression tests. I have built and checked the office several times on Windows, MacOS and Linux. I synchronized regular to trunk a

Re: Make x Dmake x Build (Was: Re: [Error] Compile AOO on Debian amd64)

On 4/19/13 12:33 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, janI wrote: > >> On 18 April 2013 22:38, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:17 AM, janI wrote: >>> On 18 April 2013 14:08, Claudio Filho wrote: > Hi > > 2013/4/18 Oliver-Rainer Wittm

[CODE]: regression 3layer Windows setup

Hi, I thought I tested very careful but it seems that I did not :-( I tested mainly the archives on windows because it's easier and faster and they worked well. I had tested the setup before and at this time it worked. Currently some former URE directories are not correct and the setup won't work

Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg

On 4/22/13 12:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:12:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: >> Hi Jani, >> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote: > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss > something. > > If we

[RELEASE]: proposed deadline for logo changes

Hi, we are moving forward to the next release and if we want have a new logo as part of this release we have to push the necessary work. It will require some work to integrate a new logo, new icons etc. in the release. I would like to propose a deadline of May 17th for a final new logo. If we can

Translation for AOO 4.0

Hi, I am currently preparing po files for AOO 4.0 and will focus on the languages that we have already released. All other langs will follow immediately. I have created 2 new projects on the "old" Pootle server to get an impression of how much work we have to do. For the UI in "de" will have to

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 4/22/13 10:18 PM, janI wrote: > On 22 April 2013 20:54, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am currently preparing po files for AOO 4.0 and will focus on the >> languages that we have already released. All other langs will follow >> immediately. >&g

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 4/22/13 10:50 PM, janI wrote: > On 22 April 2013 22:27, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/22/13 10:18 PM, janI wrote: >>> On 22 April 2013 20:54, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am currently preparing po files for

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 4/22/13 8:54 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently preparing po files for AOO 4.0 and will focus on the > languages that we have already released. All other langs will follow > immediately. > > I have created 2 new projects on the "old" Pootle serve

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 4/24/13 11:34 PM, janI wrote: > On 24 April 2013 22:33, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > >> Am Mittwoch, 24. April 2013 um 17:06 schrieb janI: >>> On 24 April 2013 16:25, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/22/13 10:50 PM, janI wrote: >>>

Re: OpenOffice not listed in incubator website

On 4/25/13 8:11 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: > Hello everyone, > > For GSoC 2013, students participating for OpenOffice are supposed to apply > for apache. But, OpenOffice is not listed on apache's incubator website: > http://incubator.apache.org/ > > Does it mean that OpenOffice is not particip

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 4/25/13 9:55 AM, janI wrote: > On 25 April 2013 07:34, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/24/13 11:34 PM, janI wrote: >>> On 24 April 2013 22:33, Juergen Schmidt wrote: >>> >>>> Am Mittwoch, 24. April 2013 um 17:06 schrieb janI: >>&

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 4/24/13 4:29 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/22/13 8:54 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am currently preparing po files for AOO 4.0 and will focus on the >> languages that we have already released. All other langs will follow >> immediately. >>

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 4/25/13 11:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/24/13 4:29 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 4/22/13 8:54 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am currently preparing po files for AOO 4.0 and will focus on the >>> languages that we have

[RELEASE]: new snapshot build based on revision 1471628

Hi, I would like to prepare a new snapshot build based on the trunk revision 1471628. I wanted change the SNAPSHOT tag but had problems to reach the server. I will try later to move the tag to trunk revision 1471628). @Ariel, is that ok and possible for you to prepare the Linux snapshot based on

Help authoring: looking for xmlhelptemplate.ott file

Hi, our integrated help authoring is not the easiest one but we had some tooling in the past that helped a little bit. Or at least could help when you get familiar with the format etc. We have a module helpauthoring in svn, it can be easy packaged as oxt and installed. I tried it yesterday, was a

Re: [RELEASE]: new snapshot build based on revision 1471628

On 4/26/13 9:07 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:51:02AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to prepare a new snapshot build based on the trunk >> revision 1471628. I wanted change the SNAPSHOT tag but had >> problem

Re: Help authoring: looking for xmlhelptemplate.ott file

On 4/26/13 9:23 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:12:29AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> our integrated help authoring is not the easiest one but we had >> some tooling in the past that helped a little bit. Or at least >>

Re: Help authoring: looking for xmlhelptemplate.ott file

On 4/26/13 10:00 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> From this mercurial cws: >>> http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/mba34issues01/rev/7918d1f1da7b >>> >>> >> thanks, I will try to ge

INFO: OpenOffice help authoring

Hi, I tried to find some info (thanks to Ariel for some additional pointers) about our help format and the help authoring tooling. If somebody has the time and interest to dive deeper in this material here are the pointers I have so far. http://www.openoffice.org/documentation/online_help/ http:

Re: [RELEASE]: new snapshot build based on revision 1471628

On 4/26/13 9:14 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/26/13 9:07 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:51:02AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to prepare a new snapshot build based on the trunk >>> revision

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 4/26/13 8:10 PM, janI wrote: > On 26 April 2013 18:52, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Claudio Filho wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Em 26/04/2013 12:13, "janI" escreveu: >>> > for the record, this was not what I saidI simply believe that a feature without help (and

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 4/26/13 9:36 PM, janI wrote: > On 26 April 2013 20:41, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/26/13 8:10 PM, janI wrote: >>> On 26 April 2013 18:52, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Claudio Filho >> wrote: >>&g

Re: [RELEASE]: new snapshot build based on revision 1471628

On 4/27/13 3:49 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:14:28AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> So let us use 1476029 > > Linux builds are available (since some hours, forgot to inform it > here). > MacOS and windows as well https://cwiki.apache.o

Re: CMIS Universal Content Provider (UCP) for Apache OpenOffice

Hi Rajath, first of all welcome at Apache OpenOffice. It's good to read that you are interesting in the CMIS proposal and that you have already started to learn more about. You have already got some very useful hints from Ariel and pointers where to start. I suggest that you take a closer look in

Re: Wish for the next AOO

Hi Andrew, I still like your idea but it means also some work and I assume that it will be difficult to include it in AOO 4.0. But that doesn't mean that we don't want support it, you should continue to promote the feature and hopefully some interested developers start working on it. Maybe a good

[RELEASE]: new SNAPSHOT build

Hi, I would like to propose a new snapshot build based on the SNAPSHOT tag which I have moved to revision 1478430 I will keep you informed when the builds for MacOS and Windows are available. @Ariel, I hope again it's ok for you Juergen -

Re: [sidebar]Bug 122049: Text displayed on Properties deck when no object is selected

On 4/30/13 8:55 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 29.04.2013 17:46, Juergen Schmidt wrote: >> Am Montag, 29. April 2013 um 09:20 schrieb Andre Fischer: >>> On 24.04.2013 13:12, Armin Le Grand wrote: Hi List, I agree that the conent (no content) is not good. What we want the user to

Re: [RELEASE]: new SNAPSHOT build

On 5/3/13 10:13 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new snapshot build based on the SNAPSHOT tag > which I have moved to revision 1478430 > > I will keep you informed when the builds for MacOS and Windows are > available. Windows and MacO

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 5/5/13 10:21 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 24/04/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Further languages will be merged as well. >> Please help me to prioritize the order how to proceed. Means I would >> like to prefer the languages where we have people working on it already, &

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 5/6/13 5:49 PM, Anton Meixome wrote: > 2013/5/6 Jürgen Schmidt > >> On 5/5/13 10:21 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> On 24/04/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>> Further languages will be merged as well. >>>> Please help me to prioritize the order how

Re: Use of boost for Statistical function (BZ 121768)

On 5/7/13 9:14 AM, janI wrote: > Hi > > I have now read this thread twice, and see a to me well known pattern. > > @pedro, I do agree with rob, that you might have choosen your comment more > wisely, that said you are the expert on the subject, so if you change the > status to "WONTFIX" it is a c

Re: Translation for AOO 4.0

On 5/6/13 9:41 PM, janI wrote: > On 6 May 2013 20:46, Anton Meixome wrote: > >> 2013/5/6 janI >> >>> On 6 May 2013 18:16, Anton Meixome wrote: >>> >>>> 2013/5/6 Jürgen Schmidt >>>> >>>>> On 5/6/13 5:49 PM, Anton Meixo

[RELEASE]: propose new snapshot build

Hi, beginning with Thursday (public holiday in Germany) I will be offline until next week. I would like to prepare a new snapshot build before because Andre added some useful enhancement in the sidebar context. I believe it would be good to have it available asap for some broader testing and feed

[RELEASE]: Updated AOO 4.0 po files

Hi, I have update the AOO 4.0 po files. The changes are small and as far as I know only 3 changes were made: svx/source/sidebar.po #: EmptyPanel.src#RID_SIDEBAR_EMPTY_PANEL.FT_MESSAGE.fixedtext.text msgid "" "Properties for the task that you are performing are not available for the " "current se

Re: [RELEASE]: Updated AOO 4.0 po files

Hi, the languages - Lithuanian (lt) - Thai (th) - Tamil (ta) are now uploaded as well Juergen On 5/7/13 4:37 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I have update the AOO 4.0 po files. The changes are small and as far as > I know only 3 changes were made: > > svx

Re: [RELEASE]: propose new snapshot build

On 5/7/13 3:20 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > beginning with Thursday (public holiday in Germany) I will be offline > until next week. > > I would like to prepare a new snapshot build before because Andre added > some useful enhancement in the sidebar context. I belie

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

On 5/9/13 9:11 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >>> It can still have some meaning: suppose someone in the >>> ecosystem is building custom versions of AOO for their >>> customers, they may want to configure with --with-vendor; they >>> ca

[RELEASE][TRANSLATION]: changes to the README file for 4.0

Hi, Ariel created a valid issue for updating the README file, a potential further translation change, see https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122300 We need a native speaker who can update and polish the README based on the input here from the list. The problem is that the README gets g

Re: Buildbot and Unofficial Developer Builds -- whats up?

On 5/15/13 1:56 AM, Andrew Rist wrote: > > On 5/13/2013 8:42 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> Hi Stuart, >> >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:16:55AM +, V Stuart Foote wrote: >>> Sorry for the cross post, but this rubs on both the QA and Dev sides >>> of the project. >>> >>> So, I understand th

Re: https://translate.apache.org

On 5/15/13 2:30 PM, Claudio Filho wrote: > Hi > > 2013/5/15 Andrea Pescetti : >> Thanks! This is a major development and it will allow new volunteers to work >> directly online (with proper attribution, very important in our case) if >> they prefer to do so. Everything looks fine for me, after aut

Re: quick update: 50,051,990

On 5/14/13 10:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > Working on blog post now, target tomorrow AM. > again a very interesting blog post Rob, many thanks. https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/apache_openoffice_one_year_50 Juergen > Regards, > > -Rob > > --

Re: Compile and see the changes in AOO

On 5/16/13 3:29 AM, Alan Eduardo Puc Pech wrote: > I'm in practice and knowing the code in Drawing. And I will make changes in > the code to experiment and innovate more. but I have a doubt. How I can > update the code changed? > > I have to apply these same steps? > > >- cd main/ ; autoconf

Re: [Pootle]Different behaviour on different browsers

On 5/16/13 1:47 PM, RGB ES wrote: > Opening Pootle on Firefox, konqueror and Chromium, no matter is I'm > logged-in or not, if I search for a text string or look at the tags for > errors automatically detected by pootle I get different behaviours. > > On firefox and konqueror after some seconds I

Translation of some extra stuff that isn't covered yet by the normal translation process

Hi, Issue 122312 [1] describe a problem with some translation relevant content that is not covered by the normal translation process. For example autotext, impress templates, wizard templates etc. The content is in /trunk/main/extras I don't know if we can manage to have translations for t

Re: [Pootle]Different behaviour on different browsers

On 5/16/13 2:37 PM, RGB ES wrote: > 2013/5/16 Claudio Filho > >> Hi >> >> 2013/5/16 Jürgen Schmidt : >>> On 5/16/13 1:47 PM, RGB ES wrote: >>>> Can someone confirm this behaviour? The lack of browse buttons means >> that >>>> it

Re: [Pootle]Different behaviour on different browsers

On 5/16/13 2:51 PM, RGB ES wrote: > 2013/5/16 Rob Weir > >> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:47 AM, RGB ES wrote: >>> Opening Pootle on Firefox, konqueror and Chromium, no matter is I'm >>> logged-in or not, if I search for a text string or look at the tags for >>> errors automatically detected by poot

Re: [Pootle]Different behaviour on different browsers

On 5/16/13 3:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 02:55:51PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> no problem, nice to solve problems so easy ;-) It sees that >> others have layout problems as well, not only OpenOffice where >> layouting of controls in th

Re: Translators needed for Wizard Templates Titles

On 5/16/13 3:03 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:47:11AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:02:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile >> wrote: >>> Hello *, >>> >>> Bug 110378 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=110378 >>> found a

GSoC projects and mentors

Hi, I am just evaluating the final GSoC proposals for OpenOffice that are 1. CMIS(Content Management Interoperability Services) UCP (Universal Content Provider) for Apache OpenOffice using Apache Chemistry 2. Apache OpenOffice Extension Plugin for Eclipse 3. Import Wizard -(popular database and

Re: [RELEASE][TRANSLATION]: changes to the README file for 4.0

On 5/13/13 3:24 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > Ariel created a valid issue for updating the README file, a potential > further translation change, see > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122300 > > We need a native speaker who can update and polish the

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

On 5/13/13 9:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 5/9/13 9:11 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >>>> It can still have some meaning: suppose someone in the >>>> ecosystem is building custom versions of AOO f

Re: Critique of the Help/About box

On 5/17/13 6:03 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 5/13/13 9:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 5/9/13 9:11 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >>> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >>>>> It can still have some meaning: suppose someone in the &

Re: [UI]Better use of space on Cross-Reference dialogue

On 5/18/13 8:14 PM, RGB ES wrote: > On the EN forum you can find a mock-up that redistribute the > Cross-Reference tab on Fields→Others dialogue, using the space in a far > better way > > Link to the post > http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?p=273543#p273543 > > link to the image

Re: [RELEASE][TRANSLATION]: changes to the README file for 4.0

On 5/19/13 6:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 17/05/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122300 >> this issue is still open and we should address it. I fixed the About >> issue and plan to work on the README on Tuesday. Any input

[RELEASE]: new snapshot based on rev. 1484675

Hi, I have moved the snapshot tag to trunk revision 1484675 and propose hereby a new snapshot build based on the SNAPSHOT tag. After this snapshot I will start to include the translations (that are already finished) in the snapshots. We will have one minor translation updated as mentioned last we

Re: [UI]Better use of space on Cross-Reference dialogue

On 5/21/13 10:33 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 21.05.2013 10:03, Regina Henschel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >>> On 5/18/13 8:14 PM, RGB ES wrote: >>>> On the EN forum you can find a mock-up that redistribute the &g

Re: basic/source/runtime/runtime.cxx: error: operation on 'pCollection' may be undefined

On 5/21/13 11:32 AM, Pavel Janík wrote: > Hi, > > anyone seeing this problem when compiling basic/source/runtime/runtime.cxx > (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117703)? > > I still have this patch in my local tree, but no longer need it. But the bug > is still not fixed in the cur

Re: [RELEASE]: new snapshot based on rev. 1484675

On 5/21/13 10:13 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I have moved the snapshot tag to trunk revision 1484675 and propose > hereby a new snapshot build based on the SNAPSHOT tag. > > After this snapshot I will start to include the translations (that are > already finished)

[RELEASE][TRANSLATION]: last update on UI project triggers again some reviews and changes

Hi, it seems that I am the bearer of bad messages ;-) But you can believe me it's no fun for me as well to update this again and again. And it is the last "planned" update for AOO 4.0 We discussed some further changes on the About dialog, README, some last changes in the context of the sidebar ..

Re: Find a better name for "sidebar"?

On 5/23/13 10:16 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > > Would not it make sense to think about the sidebar to give a distinctive name? > OOo and StarOffice but were really known for standalone name of GUI elements. > > What I mean are terms such as "Navigator", "Giesskanne" or "Datenpilot" (all >

Re: Need commit help

On 5/22/13 7:27 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Ariel, > > thank you for correcting it. > > I have seen the wrong flag in my local source now. I hope, I remember > next time, that inside Cygwin is not Windows and I have to use "ls -l" > and not "dir". Does it mean we have now a minimal help file

Re: Find a better name for "sidebar"?

On 5/23/13 11:55 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello Jürgen, *, > >> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] > >> well sidebar as name is now flowing around since months and now it is >> simply to late from my perspective. > > You're right, bu

Re: Find a better name for "sidebar"?

On 5/23/13 1:02 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > >> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] > >> we can start promote this feature already, we can create screencasts, >> can blog about it, can make clear where it comes from ... >> >> If LO co

Re: Find a better name for "sidebar"?

On 5/23/13 2:20 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >> I understand it quite well but in the end the work have to done. The >> term sidebar is not new and the work is ongoing since month >> and we have >> many other things to do. I feel it very mistimed to start such a >> discussion now. > > You're right,

Re: [RELEASE][TRANSLATION]: changes to the README file for 4.0

On 5/23/13 7:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On May 21, 2013, at 2:39 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: > >> On 5/19/13 6:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> On 17/05/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id2300 >>>

Re: svn git setup instructions.

On 5/24/13 9:19 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 23.05.2013 19:22, Regina Henschel wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> >> Ariel is the expert here. But perhaps some sites help you, which I >> have bookmarked: >> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSvnCrashCourse >> http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-s

Re: Find a better name for "sidebar"?

On 5/24/13 9:47 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >>> I do see the need for good marketing >> >> ??? >> >> I do not understand this statement. > > i am so sorry > > I had mistakenly read "dont" instead of "do" > I believe you put far too much weight in a name of an of course good feature. The sideb

Re: CMIS - First Code using Apache Chemistry Java API

On 5/21/13 6:28 PM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: > Hello everyone, > I began developing using Apache Chemistry API today inorder to get used to > it before GSoC. I have written some code. It has some runtime errors. Help > me in correcting it. > > https://github.com/rajaths589/CMISTrial.git > Hi Ra

[RELEASE]: proposed further schedule towards AOO 4.0

Hi, I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address these problems. We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have identified some problems regarding the 64bit port on MacOS that I will try to explain

Re: [RELEASE]: proposed further schedule towards AOO 4.0

On 5/27/13 11:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI wrote: >> On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the >>> problems I see. An

Re: Google Summer of Code 2013

On 5/27/13 9:09 PM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thank you for placing confidence in my skills. > I'll make sure that I'll put my 100% effort in bonding with the community > and completing my project. > I'll definitely utilize this opportunity very well. > > THANK YOU. > Hi R

Re: Naming and Trademark Concerns

On 5/28/13 4:12 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On May 27, 2013, at 8:28 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> I just now reviewed Jürgen's latest snapshot build and I have some trademark >> concerns. The current UI and Help file seem to be out of Apache Branding >> policy[1][2] in two ways. >> >> (1) T

Re: [RELEASE]: proposed further schedule towards AOO 4.0

On 5/28/13 1:03 PM, janI wrote: > On 28 May 2013 09:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 5/27/13 11:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI wrote: >>>> On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>> >>>>>

Re: [RELEASE]: proposed further schedule towards AOO 4.0

On 5/27/13 5:17 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the > problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address > these problems. > > We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have ident

[RELEASE]: translation deadline June 18th latest

Hi, on the dev list I have proposed our way towards the AOO 4.0 release and one important part is the translation. I proposed a deadline of June 14th but had to correct myself because I am not available form June 14-17 and it seems that I again will be the bottleneck. Anyway I will start to inte

Re: Project Description Review

On 5/29/13 3:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Rajath Shashidhara > wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I am updating the wiki page about my gsoc project. Please review this >> document. >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-OA9KqlM2JjrrmEiulxIYGuw0fJN5GQB0iEpdKTQxQ/edit?usp

Re: Project Description Review

as examples. We will see later Juergen > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 5/29/13 3:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Rajath Shashidhara >>> wrote: >>>> Hello Everyone, >>>>

Re: [RELEASE]: translation deadline June 18th latest

On 5/28/13 4:51 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > on the dev list I have proposed our way towards the AOO 4.0 release and > one important part is the translation. > > I proposed a deadline of June 14th but had to correct myself because I > am not available form June 14-1

Re: Insert new page into the wiki

On 5/31/13 12:25 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Raphael Bircher > > Your discussion does not help me. > > I want to help to improve the de-websites I've offered on the > users...@openoffice.apache.org list for more t

Re: glosary/terminology files in pootle

On 5/31/13 12:34 PM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > I have been hesitating to write this mail, due to the publicly announcement > that I am "opposing the project", but the work of Claudio Filho deserve > merit and action. come on, you know exactly that this is not true and we appreciate all what you are d

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >