On 5/24/13 9:47 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >>> I do see the need for good marketing >> >> ??? >> >> I do not understand this statement. > > i am so sorry > > I had mistakenly read "dont" instead of "do" >
I believe you put far too much weight in a name of an of course good feature. The sidebar is a concept to improve the usability for many features we already have and it is hopefully only the beginning. And it is also the entry point to hook external features smoothly in the office. I can think of many nice things that be hooked as a new deck with one or more content panels... But nobody will talk about deck or content panels, that are internal technical names. People will talk about a new sidebar if at all or will simply use it. We can of course do very good marketing by simply start working on a campaign to promote the feature itself. Again I would love to see some nice screencast and other useful stuff, blog posts, or complete articles. But instead of really start working on such a campaign, people start discussing a name. Such discussion involves always many people because it is so easy to express the own opinion but do nothing. And besides the fact that sidebar is already settled in many heads (including users) we don't have a better name yet. Nothing of the proposed names is worth the effort of such a change now fro my point of view. And I don't think that it is necessary to do proper marketing ;-) Juergen > > > Greetings, > Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
