Re: GSOC: Issue regarding proposal submission.

Hello Piyush, You leave comment to JIRA ticker and/or contact airavata dev@ ML: https://airavata.apache.org/mailing-list.html :)) On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 00:40, Piyush Panchal wrote: > > Hi, I am a passionate python developer. I have created a proposal for > contribution in the issue

GSOC: Issue regarding proposal submission.

Hi, I am a passionate python developer. I have created a proposal for contribution in the issue AIRAVATA-3956 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-3956> (Update Airavata Django Portal to a Supported Python Version) but I'm not able to find the contact point where I ca

collaboration proposal

Hello, I hope this message finds you well. We have improved the mathematical apparatus for generative AI, and now it does not have hallucinations. You can read about this here. So, now AI based on our technology can write stable predictable code. There is no need to review and correct it. This

[jira] [Commented] (COMDEV-382) Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container images ASF policies

tely forgotten about. Maybe good time to rectify that. > Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container images ASF > policies > --- > > Key: COMDEV-382 >

[jira] [Commented] (COMDEV-382) Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container images ASF policies

here? You have written the proposal. I presume that taking that proposal to legal-discuss is the next step. ComDev just isn't the right place for a discussion around legal policy, which is likely why there's been no further action here. > Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Cha

Re: Proposal for a Working Group - wg-targetted-mentoring

Hey, Nick, I know there hasn't been much discussion of this. I want to encourage you to create a start at the content in the Github repo - https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups - and outline what we need to do to get there, and get a project or two onboard to start the discussion. As I

Re: Proposal for a Working Group - wg-targetted-mentoring

Reiterating what I said in Denver - this is a fantastic idea, and a great way to get people involved in projects that might otherwise become invisible. Part of this might also be working with projects to more directly call out other projects that they depend on, collaborate with, or are depended

Re: Proposal for a Working Group - wg-targetted-mentoring

I am in. I will think of a name :) On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:48 PM Nick Burch wrote: > Hi All > > I'd like to propose a new Working Group. I'm not certain the name is > right, but I can't think of anything better... Help needed on that! > > For helping match Apache Projects who'd like new contri

Proposal for a Working Group - wg-targetted-mentoring

Hi All I'd like to propose a new Working Group. I'm not certain the name is right, but I can't think of anything better... Help needed on that! For helping match Apache Projects who'd like new contributors, with Companies who indirectly depend on them. The aim would be to co-ordinate, provi

Re: Proposal for working group: wg-security

I would be happy to help in a WG if one gets created :-) Gary On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 4:38 AM Arnout Engelen wrote: > Getting those recommendations out there would be great! > > Between security-discuss (https://security.apache.org/mailinglist/), > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/S

Re: Proposal for working group: wg-security

All, On 10/9/24 20:14, Christopher Schultz wrote: Hello! I would like to propose a security working group to make recommendations to projects for how they can establish or improve their security practices. I have a list of about 10 things I can think of off the top of my head that I could pr

Re: Proposal for working group: wg-security

Infra makes good use of the Slack huddle feature for a monthly live chat. It is tightly integrated with the conversation thread in the related 'roundtable' channel. The ASF Board is offering 'office hours' in the same way. Security could set such a thing up without having to spin up a presence on a

Re: Proposal for working group: wg-security

I like the idea of a video call. Gary On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:07 AM Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 11:00, Mark J. Cox wrote: > > Hi Chris! As Arnout wrote, we set up the public security-discuss list > and wiki to be such a working group to capture and share so

Re: Proposal for working group: wg-security

Hi Mark, On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 11:00, Mark J. Cox wrote: > Hi Chris! As Arnout wrote, we set up the public security-discuss list and > wiki to be such a working group to capture and share some best practices > among our projects. It was the follow-up from some of the good ideas > captured a

Re: Proposal for working group: wg-security

Hi Chris! As Arnout wrote, we set up the public security-discuss list and wiki to be such a working group to capture and share some best practices among our projects. It was the follow-up from some of the good ideas captured after the White House meetings following on from log4shell. Then, an

Re: Proposal for working group: wg-security

Getting those recommendations out there would be great! Between security-discuss (https://security.apache.org/mailinglist/), https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SECURITY/ and the security team I'm not entirely sure we also need a working group, but if it helps then I'm all for it and happy

Proposal for working group: wg-security

Hello! I would like to propose a security working group to make recommendations to projects for how they can establish or improve their security practices. I have a list of about 10 things I can think of off the top of my head that I could propose for such a working group. I am also offering t

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

ubscribe by sending email to dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org> > > From: Rich Bowen > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2024 8:57:25 AM > To: ASF ComDev > Subject: Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

I don't understand why I'm seeing these emails. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: Rich Bowen Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2024 8:57:25 AM To: ASF ComDev Subject: Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 22:12 Just

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 22:12 Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Can you give us some idea of what you have already changed in the CoC > text, I expected a little more from the version control history. > I changed "community leaders" to PMC members a few places. I believe that's the only chance I made

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

Hi, Can you give us some idea of what you have already changed in the CoC text, I expected a little more from the version control history. Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For a

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

Cool. Started here: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/tree/main/wg-code-of-conduct Let’s discuss specific changes to the text here, with a [WG: Code of conduct] tag in email subjects. Thanks. — Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

Hi, I can also help out here. Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

dent committee, and act only in an advisory capacity. >>> >>> (I know you know this, but it bears reminding and repeating this for others >>> watching this conversation.) >> >> I suppose if the board wants to take some action it could pass a resolution

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

> On Jun 11, 2024, at 9:55 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > > > >> On Jun 11, 2024, at 06:31, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >>> On Jun 11, 2024, at 6:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:33 PM Rich Bowen wrote: ...Many ASF projects do not have a code

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

> On Jun 11, 2024, at 06:31, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> On Jun 11, 2024, at 6:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:33 PM Rich Bowen wrote: >>> ...Many ASF projects do not have a code of conduct, and push this up to the >>> Foundation. This mostly seem

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

> On Jun 11, 2024, at 6:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:33 PM Rich Bowen wrote: >> ...Many ASF projects do not have a code of conduct, and push this up to the >> Foundation. This mostly seems >> to work, in practice, most of the time, but the public *

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

> On Jun 11, 2024, at 03:05, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:33 PM Rich Bowen wrote: >> ...Many ASF projects do not have a code of conduct, and push this up to the >> Foundation. This mostly seems >> to work, in practice, most of the time, but the public *pe

Re: [WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

Hi, On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:33 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > ...Many ASF projects do not have a code of conduct, and push this up to the > Foundation. This mostly seems > to work, in practice, most of the time, but the public *perception* is just > that they don’t have one... I think this should be

[WG: Code of conduct] Proposal

Hi, folks, At our board face-to-face meeting in Bratislava last weekend, the topic of a code of conduct was raised. Without getting into all of the historical confusion around our code of conduct, I have a proposal for a working group: TL;DR: We should create a recommended template Code of

Re: GSOC proposal guidelines or templates

Hi Miko, Welcome to the community! Here are some hints about the application template https://community.apache.org/gsoc/#application-template and other related resources. Best wishes for your proposal. On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 at 20:17, Miko Aro wrote: > > Hello Danny, > > I would lik

GSOC proposal guidelines or templates

Hello Danny, I would like to know if there are any other proposal guidelines or templates for GSOC 2024 program under the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) one will have to conform to aside from the accepted template on the page on here <https://community.apache.org/gsoc/>. Recently fou

Re: [WG: Welcome] Proposal, a Welcome Working Group - onboarding too?

gt; I've already listed the majority of actual sources our tooling actually mails > or includes links to people in various places: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Proposal%3A+Improving+Onboarding+Experiences > Yeah, that’s definitely a lot of work that w

Re: [WG: Welcome] Proposal, a Welcome Working Group - onboarding too?

on an additional project), PMC member, officer, Member, etc. I've already listed the majority of actual sources our tooling actually mails or includes links to people in various places: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Proposal%3A+Improving+Onboarding+Experiences We

Re: [WG: Welcome] Proposal, a Welcome Working Group

t on your own” responses. > * Maybe work on some kind of a badging program (See > https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ if you don’t know what I mean by that) > to incentivize and gamify community engagement, for reasons that I would > love to talk much more about, but are beyond the scope of this

Re: [WG: Welcome] Proposal, a Welcome Working Group

g involved, so that we don’t continue this practice of unhelpful > “go figure it out on your own” responses. > > * Maybe work on some kind of a badging program (See > https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ if you don’t know what I mean by that) > to incentivize and gamify c

Re: New Project Proposal

great > learning experience for a lot of people among us. > > Please let me know your thoughts on this proposal. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Ayaan Khan

Re: [WG: Website] Proposal - Website working group

I'd like to be part and contribute with this new WG On 07/02/2024 17:11, Rich Bowen wrote: Proposed: Form a formal Website working group. (I am aware that I haven’t defined “working group” yet, and I do, in fact, intend to propose a Working Groups Working Group which could possibly formalize

Re: [WG: Welcome] Proposal, a Welcome Working Group

for reasons that I would love to > talk much more about, but are beyond the scope of this proposal. > > What do y’all think? > > — > Rich Bowen > rbo...@rcbowen.com > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org

Re: [WG: Website] Proposal - Website working group

I’ve put a couple of docs in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/community/wg-website as a starting point. Note that someone has already opened an infra ticket to mirror this on Github, so if you hate svn, just wait a day or two. I will be moving my ToDo list, which currently resides on pap

Re: [WG: WG] Proposal: Working groups working group

rs involved. More concretely, said a WG proposal with an initial members group, with one or more committers as mentors, and approved by the comdev PMC. This should be similar to the Incubator process. Best, tison. [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/leadership-council/tree/main/minutes/sync-meeting

Re: [WG: WG] Proposal: Working groups working group

>> I just want to make these things more discoverable > please feel free to jump in and make an infra ticket to move/mirror that to > GitHub If discoverable is an object, I suggest we use GitHub, at least as a mirror and accept issues and discussions. It's also easier to share over social media.

Re: [WG: WG] Proposal: Working groups working group

> On Feb 7, 2024, at 11:22 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > * Where to we want to track WG status? I would propose that we create > GitHub.com/apache/community for stuff > like this, to mirror GitHub.com/kubernetes/community >

Re: [WG: Website] Proposal - Website working group

+1 Please count me in this WG. Below is my thoughts: > I would hope that a WG would have regular checkins (could be email, Slack, > Google Meet For an async group, we can use ASF Slack with a new channel. #zookeeper-release is in this flavor and it works well. For any actionable items we can dis

Re:[WG: Website] Proposal - Website working group

> Ensure that we don’t duplicate, contradict, or confuse. Agreed, I’d like to be part of it if. Please let me know if there are anything I can give a hand. Thanks. -- Trista Pan Twitter & Github: tristaZero On 02/

Re: [WG: WG] Proposal: Working groups working group

Hi Rich, I strongly agree with your proposal for forming working groups. As a newcomer to the Apache Community without the technical background, I have always hoped to have more opportunities to contribute to the ASF beyond participating in the community building of my own project, but often

Re: [WG: Welcome] Proposal, a Welcome Working Group

fedoraproject.org/ if you don’t know what I mean by that) to > incentivize and gamify community engagement, for reasons that I would love to > talk much more about, but are beyond the scope of this proposal. > > What do y’all think? > > — > Rich Bowen > rbo...@rcbowen

Re: [WG: Website] Proposal - Website working group

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 5:11 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > ...I would hope that a WG would have regular checkins... I cannot commit to any synchronous work, but... > If you are interested in helping form this group, please speak up in this > thread, > and help us help one another... I'm happy to help

Re: [WG: Website] Proposal - Website working group

I would be happy to take part in the website working group On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 12:11 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > Proposed: Form a formal Website working group. > > (I am aware that I haven’t defined “working group” yet, and I do, in fact, > intend to propose a Working Groups Working Group which co

[WG: Welcome] Proposal, a Welcome Working Group

would love to talk much more about, but are beyond the scope of this proposal. What do y’all think? — Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com

[WG: WG] Proposal: Working groups working group

Proposed: A Working Group to help define Working Groups No, I’m not suggesting a top-down governance of working groups. What I’m suggesting is a group to discuss what a working group looks like and what kind of tools and processes we want to put in place to make sure that each WG isn’t inventin

[WG: Website] Proposal - Website working group

Proposed: Form a formal Website working group. (I am aware that I haven’t defined “working group” yet, and I do, in fact, intend to propose a Working Groups Working Group which could possibly formalize what a working group looks like. I have some ideas, but no desire to go define it on my own.)

Re: Proposal: Consolidate the various pages about voting/deciding

On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 15:45 -0400, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > Proposal: Consolidate the various pages about voting/deciding See https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/128 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

Re: Proposal to update events website UI

Mark Thomas wrote on 8/17/23 9:25 AM: On 17/08/2023 05:53, Abhiram Krishna wrote: Hey, I am a web developer from India. I happened to come across events.apache.org. I would like to try and revamp the website UI to the latest standards. What and how are the procedures to be followed. The web

Re: Proposal to update events website UI

On 17/08/2023 05:53, Abhiram Krishna wrote: Hey, I am a web developer from India. I happened to come across events.apache.org. I would like to try and revamp the website UI to the latest standards. What and how are the procedures to be followed. The website source may be found at: https://githu

Proposal to update events website UI

Hey, I am a web developer from India. I happened to come across events.apache.org. I would like to try and revamp the website UI to the latest standards. What and how are the procedures to be followed. Abhiram Krishna

Re: Proposal: Consolidate the various pages about voting/deciding

Hi, Note that you also need to understand some of the terms as described here [1] to understand that page [2]. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html 2. https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting

Re: Proposal: Consolidate the various pages about voting/deciding

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:45 PM wrote: > > We have four pages that discuss decision making, voting, consensus, and > so on... Aaaargh, and none of them even link to https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting (though some other pages of the website do) > ...I'd like to consolidate, but would like t

Re: Proposal: Consolidate the various pages about voting/deciding

ting being another?) but having four, with > largely overlapping content, is confusing. > > I'd like to consolidate, but would like to hear opinions as to whether > this is one page or two (or some other answer) before I get started. > > Still working on the last proposal, FYI,

Re: Proposal: Consolidate the various pages about voting/deciding

like to hear opinions as to whether > this is one page or two (or some other answer) before I get started. > > Still working on the last proposal, FYI, so this is still a ways out. > Or, maybe someone else can tackle it? > > --Rich > > --

Proposal: Consolidate the various pages about voting/deciding

ge or two (or some other answer) before I get started. Still working on the last proposal, FYI, so this is still a ways out. Or, maybe someone else can tackle it? --Rich - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.or

Re: Proposal: Consolidate redundant beginner pages

Hi, On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 8:45 PM wrote: > ...Thoughts/advice/objections solicited... This all looks good to me provided redirects are defined for pages which go away - thanks for taking care of this! -Bertrand - To unsubscr

Re: Proposal: Consolidate redundant beginner pages

ur only > camelCaps directory. The content in the 101.html page is kinda for new > contributors, with a little "finding your way around" thrown in. > > /newcomers/ is almost entirely links to other places. And, here too, > there's just that one file in that directory.

Proposal: Consolidate redundant beginner pages

otherwise empty. It's also our only camelCaps directory. The content in the 101.html page is kinda for new contributors, with a little "finding your way around" thrown in. /newcomers/ is almost entirely links to other places. And, here too, there's just that one fil

GSoC proposal Make RocketMQ support higher versions of Java

collaborate with other developers in the community to ensure the success of the project. Thank you for considering my proposal. Please let me know if you have any questions or if there are any additional details I can provide. Sincerely, Abhijeet

Re: GSoC proposal Make RocketMQ support higher versions of Java

C program, and I > am committed to completing the project within the given timeline. I > would also be happy to collaborate with other developers in the > community to ensure the success of the project. > > Thank you for considering my proposal. Please le

My Proposal Draft for Apache ShenYu Gsoc 2023 - Design license scanning function

Hello to all the members of the community, I hope this email finds you all well. I am particularly interested in designing a license scanning function as it aligns with my interests and skills. I believe that my proposal to design a license scanning function will benefit the project by automating

GSoC proposal Make RocketMQ support higher versions of Java

collaborate with other developers in the community to ensure the success of the project. Thank you for considering my proposal. Please let me know if you have any questions or if there are any additional details I can provide. Sincerely, Abhijeet

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

Ok On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, 9:53 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > On Dec 8, 2022, at 6:44 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > > On 2022/12/08 20:30:02 Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> ... > >> Bu t I mentioned, I get your point. Would you be less concerned with a > domain like asf.social, since this is not an

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

> On Dec 8, 2022, at 6:44 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On 2022/12/08 20:30:02 Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> ... >> Bu t I mentioned, I get your point. Would you be less concerned with a >> domain like asf.social, since this is not an official domain? Assuming >> asf.social would be only for AS

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

On 2022/12/08 20:30:02 Christian Grobmeier wrote: >... > Bu t I mentioned, I get your point. Would you be less concerned with a domain > like asf.social, since this is not an official domain? Assuming asf.social > would be only for ASF community, but also allow "offical" accounts like > press@as

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

Hi Joe, I fully understood your point. Let me ask one question here. If we are concerned about how we would appear in public, because of one committer would say something using their Mastodon: Aren't we saying "PR over community, community over code?" Community is also because we have opposite

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

There's a very large difference between email and a Mastodon account. There's an implicit expectation of moderation around Mastodon instances and major differences how people use and consume a microblogging service vs. email. I often tell people that "everything you say publicly is PR" and that's

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

I like my j...@apache.org<mailto:j...@apache.org> email to ! 😊 From: Owen O'Malley Date: Monday, December 5, 2022 at 7:25 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance I disagree. I think having an individual identity at Apache is impo

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

I disagree. I think having an individual identity at Apache is important. Just because I have omalley@X doesn't mean that it is the same as omal...@apache.org. Having a gmail address does not mean that I don't use omal...@apache.org. .. Owen On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 9:25 PM Joe Brockmeier wrote:

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 7:33 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 4:50 AM Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > > > TL;DR: given a set of moderation guidelines and volunteers to > > > administer them, I'm willing to set up and host an ASF > > > Fedivers

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal of guidelines for individuals <> businesses Apache Way compliant relationships

NOT to click on > the link in the message if you are not willing to transmit anything to > Google. > > I am attaching a PDF version of the proposal for those who prefer not to. > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:40 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal of guidelines for individuals <> businesses Apache Way compliant relationships

And following up on another (infra thread) - feel free NOT to click on the link in the message if you are not willing to transmit anything to Google. I am attaching a PDF version of the proposal for those who prefer not to. On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:40 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Hello ev

[DISCUSS] Proposal of guidelines for individuals <> businesses Apache Way compliant relationships

Hello everyone, I would like to start a discussion on something I've been thinking and discussing with a number of people offline, before I brought it here for wider discussion. I want to (eventually) propose to the board of the ASF to publish (formally among other ASF guidelines) a document that

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 4:50 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi, > > Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > TL;DR: given a set of moderation guidelines and volunteers to > > administer them, I'm willing to set up and host an ASF > > Fediverse/ActivityPub instance on fly.io... > > Do you mean to open this to ev

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022, at 10:49, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> TL;DR: given a set of moderation guidelines and volunteers to >> administer them, I'm willing to set up and host an ASF >> Fediverse/ActivityPub instance on fly.io... > > Do you mean to open this to everybody

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

Hi, Sam Ruby wrote: > > TL;DR: given a set of moderation guidelines and volunteers to > administer them, I'm willing to set up and host an ASF > Fediverse/ActivityPub instance on fly.io... Do you mean to open this to everybody who has an @apache.org account? Or just for a few official handles l

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

I will help with community management, software administration, however else I can assist I’m open to. Steve Blackmon, PMC Chair Apache Streams On Dec 1, 2022, 8:51 PM -0600, Matt Sicker , wrote: > I could help with modding as long as I’m not the only one :) > > — > Matt Sicker > > > On Dec 1, 20

Re: [Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

I could help with modding as long as I’m not the only one :) — Matt Sicker > On Dec 1, 2022, at 08:13, Sam Ruby wrote: > > TL;DR: given a set of moderation guidelines and volunteers to > administer them, I'm willing to set up and host an ASF > Fediverse/ActivityPub instance on fly.io. > > - -

[Proposal] ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance

TL;DR: given a set of moderation guidelines and volunteers to administer them, I'm willing to set up and host an ASF Fediverse/ActivityPub instance on fly.io. - - - Technical background: While Mastodon is the most common and known implementation, there are plenty of others at various stages of

Any incubation proposal template for projects which leaving the attic.

Hi All, I have gone through the process to leave the attic[1]. Once after I fork the code,For incubation proposal any specific template and guidelines needs to be followed..? Any pointers will be appreciated. 1. https://attic.apache.org/ --Brahma Reddy Battula

Re: New committer invitation template proposal

Hi All, Did the changes proposed in this thread ever happen to https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/blob/master/source/newcommitter.md ? I can't find it in the file history, but there could be something I'm missing. I'm asking because we'd like to add a new committer to our project who is already

[jira] [Comment Edited] (COMDEV-382) Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container images ASF policies

(or at least I have not seen any). The "compiled" package (as I explained in my proposal) does not really apply to docker image - simply because at the time the policy was created, distribution via mechanism like Docker image was not a thing. But I would love to clarify and modernize the

[jira] [Comment Edited] (COMDEV-382) Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container images ASF policies

(or at least I have not seen any). The "compiled" package (as I explained in my proposal) does not really apply to docker image - simply because at the time the policy was created, distribution via mechanism like Docker image was not a thing. But I would love to clarify and modernize the

[jira] [Commented] (COMDEV-382) Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container images ASF policies

|https://airflow.apache.org/docs/docker-stack/build.html] I think it does not seem to bother anyone else but me, so for me the state is literally "status quo".  I beleive there is no written policy on the installation vs. using images (or at least I have not seen any). The "compi

[jira] [Comment Edited] (COMDEV-382) Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container images ASF policies

(or at least I have not seen any). The "compiled" package (as I explained in my proposal) does not really apply to docker image - simply because at the time the policy was created, distribution via mechanism like Docker image was not a thing. But I would love to clarify and modernize the

[jira] [Commented] (COMDEV-382) Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container images ASF policies

ncluded in the parent image referenced in the FROM line. This seems like an odd distinction to make. Could someone shed some light on this proposal's status and how other teams are handling the issue I mention above? > Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container

Re: Proposal to add "release requirements" check

It's an interesting (but not practical) idea to base the set of active branches on the links in documentation pages.I would never try to do that really and it was never anywhere close to my proposal - scanning download pages is only to check if they have proper links/closer.lua script, no

Re: Proposal to add "release requirements" check

On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 17:49, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > However this does not solve the issue of stale download pages: how do > you know when a release version is no longer supported? > > What do you mean? > > Is there a requirement for that that I missed? I believe the > requirement is only about

Re: Proposal to add "release requirements" check

I was also talking more from a user perspective. It's not that hard to create a one pager that contains the latest version, release dates, release notes and keys for all packages the project provides. In the case of Airflow it's pretty much what you put in announcements, and this one is fairly obv

Re: Proposal to add "release requirements" check

> On Nov 8, 2021, at 9:48 AM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> However this does not solve the issue of stale download pages: how do > you know when a release version is no longer supported? > > What do you mean? > > Is there a requirement for that that I missed? I believe the > requirement is only

Re: Proposal to add "release requirements" check

> However this does not solve the issue of stale download pages: how do you know when a release version is no longer supported? What do you mean? Is there a requirement for that that I missed? I believe the requirement is only about removing artifacts from "downloads.a.o" and this is a completely

Re: Proposal to add "release requirements" check

On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 17:11, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Yeah. We will have different URLs especially as more artifacts are > produced (airflow has 3 of those each with different download pages). > > But this should be straightforward when you can add the url when > registering the release (as Sebb pr

Re: Proposal to add "release requirements" check

Yeah. We will have different URLs especially as more artifacts are produced (airflow has 3 of those each with different download pages). But this should be straightforward when you can add the url when registering the release (as Sebb proposed). According to the release process you should register

Re: Proposal to add "release requirements" check

On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 11:29, Hans Van Akelyen wrote: > > Hi, > > I think a certain level of uniformity would not be bad for this. > Having a fixed path to the downloads for each project makes it simpler for > the users to "shop" for Apache projects. > > Having .a.o/download/ as a link that should

  1   2   3   4   5   >