> On Jun 11, 2024, at 07:17, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jun 11, 2024, at 9:55 AM, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jun 11, 2024, at 06:31, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jun 11, 2024, at 6:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:33 PM Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >>>>> ...Many ASF projects do not have a code of conduct, and push this up to >>>>> the Foundation. This mostly seems >>>>> to work, in practice, most of the time, but the public *perception* is >>>>> just that they don’t have one... >>>> >>>> I think this should be handled like >>>> https://security.apache.org/projects/ : projects CAN have their own >>>> code of conduct page and contact address, and if they don't they MUST >>>> point to the ASF's page and contact address >>> >>> While I agree in principle, ComDev cannot say MUST to any project. We are a >>> PMC, not a Board/President committee, and act only in an advisory capacity. >>> >>> (I know you know this, but it bears reminding and repeating this for others >>> watching this conversation.) >> >> I suppose if the board wants to take some action it could pass a resolution… > > > The work that this working group needs to do is, I believe, a prerequisite to > asking the board to make such a resolution. If you feel differently, don’t > wait for me, but that’s how I see things.
We are in agreement. The board should act only after there is agreement on a proposal that has been carefully reviewed. Craig > > —Rich (speaking with my fictional “hat” as a Member, not as a Director) Craig L Russell c...@apache.org
