On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:13:48 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Tools like reportbug work out of the box on my machine; I suppose that
> it is because they recognise the DEBEMAIL environment variable, in which
> there is a routable email adress to use. Do you think that tagpending
> could use it?
It
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:38:15 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > Meanwhile, could you explain the logic behind the version number 0.99-2+ds1.
> > (I suppose one could also look up policy on this but I'm being lazy!)
> Well. 0.99-2 because the archive already has 0.99-1. The "+ds1" part means
> that
>
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:10:32 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > $ cp ggobi-2.1.7.tar.bz2 ggobi_2.1.7.orig.tar.bz2
> Debian provides many facilities in the `devscripts' package. One of them
> is the uscan/uupdate programs. They need a special file in the source
> package, `debian/watch',
TTBOMK uup
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:49:26 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> Maybe someone in the Pkg-Perl group has an interest in adopting this into
> the group instead?
Sounds like a good idea.
I'll take a closer look at the package tomorrow.
Ch
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:14:06 +0200, Fabio Balzano wrote:
> I want to help Debian and
Great!
> I need some advice where I can start, and where
> I can find a contact to receive first job.
An "easy" way for contributing to Debian way is to join one of the
existing teams:
http://wiki.debian.org/T
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:55:44 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote:
> It builds these binary packages:
> pacpl - a multi-purpose audio converter/ripper/tagger script
>
> Long Description:
> Perl Audio Converter is a tool for converting multiple audio types from one
> format to another using various exter
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:49:37 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote:
> [ I apologize for the private mail to Gregor, it was an error of mine. ]
[ No problem, actually I saw the one on -mentors before :) ]
> > > I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me.
> > Just a few remarks:
>
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:32:50 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote:
> > I found two last small issues:
> Fixed!
Thanks, downloaded, checked and uploaded.
Feel free to contact me via private mail for new uploads of this
package.
> > PS: I think this package would be a good candidate for the
> > applicatio
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:06:43 +0200, Robert Wohlrab wrote:
> So can somebody provide some examples for such a script in a
> debian package or give me some informations what they should with what.
> I had different ideas. For example to extract the provided tar.gz, remove the
> non-dfsg dir and re
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:01:30 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Should I rename the directory in the .orig.tar and make
> > tamper-checking more difficult, or not rename the directory in the
> > .orig.tar and make tamper-checking easier?
> You should not, dpkg-source copes well enough.
True, on the
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:58:36 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > You should not, dpkg-source copes well enough.
> > True, on the other hand the Developer's Reference suggests in
> > 6.7.8.2:
> > 4. should use -.orig as the name
> > of the top-level directory in its tarball.
> > Is this recom
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:09:18AM +0200, Ram Kumar DANGETI wrote:
> The following manpage has the complete explanation of debconf. Setting
> DEBIAN_FRONTEND to the required value could be useful for uninterrupted
> installation.
> http://linux.com.hk/PenguinWeb/manpage.jsp?section=7&name=debcon
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:45:19AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Is it all right to use sed -i? sed -i is supported only in sed 4+. I
> guess it is..., then does my build need to depend on sed?
I don't think so because sed is a build-essential packages:
cf. /usr/share/build-essential/essential-pa
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:58:16PM +0100, Daniel Widenfalk wrote:
> I've verified that key works using the scripts posted by Christoph Berg.
> The key is available when searching through the web interface on
> keyserver.pgp.com. I guess it has not yet propagated to other servers?
>
> The key ID i
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:56:24AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I've noticed that some packages contain a debian/patches-dir and I'm curious
> how this works.
debian/patches is used by dpatch, the necessary information should be
available in man dpatch.
> Can someone explain to me how to app
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I'm having some (for any Debian Developer surely) trivial problems
> with the dependencies: Shishi's configure finds gnutls13 on my local
> machine, but Debian doesn't have gnutls13 yet. So when I install the
> packages on another
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:32:53PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I can't find any mention of the configure script of packages in
> section 6 of the policy. Can somebody please point me to a reference
> of how and when it is run (what arguments, etc)?
AFAIK there is/can be a configure target
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:24:38AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > AFAIK there is/can be a configure target in debian/rules.
> Or, are you talking about ./debian/rules configure target, which
> probably just calls ./configure, or maybe sets up some symlinks or
> such?
That's what I meant.
grego
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:16:25AM +0100, Daniel Knabl wrote:
> > Are you planning on providing fully generalized "maintainer script"
> > handling of the config files, or are conffiles sufficient?
> I am trying this right now in ./debian/postinst:
> cat /usr/share/doc/vexim/setup/mysql.sql |\
>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 07:04:33PM +0100, Daniel Knabl wrote:
> > file:///usr/share/doc/debian-policy/
> > policy.html/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-mscriptsinstact
> Hm, I do understand that this is a very important and critical part of
> the policy. But, due to my non-perfect English, it's hard to
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
Title: libmail-gnupg-perl -- Perl module for processing email with GPG
ITP: #351470
Details:
* Package name: libmail-gnupg-perl
Version : 0.08
Upstream Author : Best Practical Solutions, LLC; Robert Spier <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
*
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
Title: libmarc-perl -- Perl extension to manipulate MAchine Readable
Cataloging records
ITP: #351471
Details:
* Package name: libmarc-perl
Version : 1.07
Upstream Author : Chuck Bearden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
Title: libnet-amazon-perl -- Perl framework for accessing amazon.com
via SOAP and XML/HTTP
ITP: #351472
Details:
* Package name: libnet-amazon-perl
Version : 0.34
Upstream Author : Mike Schilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:17:18AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
> > Title: libmail-gnupg-perl -- Perl module for processing email with GPG
> > ITP: #351470
> You just found it :)
Wow thanks - that was quick ;-)
And I'm really excited about th
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:10:39AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
> > Title: libmarc-perl -- Perl extension to manipulate MAchine Readable
> >Cataloging records
> > ITP: #351471
> Uploaded.
Thanks a lot.
Unfortunately there's a problem
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:19:58AM -0500, Jim wrote:
> It sounds like I should do some reading (thanks for the link) ... I'll
> try and poke around this evening see what I can do ...
Another good link for starting:
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/
"How You Can Help"
Cf. also several of the pag
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:10:39AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
(Cross-"posting" debian-mentors and debian-perl, please choose
appropriate list(s) for reply.)
Hi Gunnar,
I just wanted to ask if you have found the time to take a second look
at libmail-gnupg-perl, libmarc-perl, and libnet-amazon-perl
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
Title: multixterm -- drive multiple xterms separately or together
ITP: #353777
Details:
* Package name: multixterm
Version : 1.8
Upstream Author : Don Libes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://expect.nist.gov/exam
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:58:37PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Title: multixterm -- drive multiple xterms separately or together
> > ITP: #353777
> Standard question: Do you know clusterssh, which does pretty much the
> same thing and is already in Debian? If no, I suggest you take look.
T
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:57:01PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > I just wanted to ask if you have found the time to take a second look
> > at libmail-gnupg-perl, libmarc-perl, and libnet-amazon-perl [0] (or
> > Dave's Emilda packages [1]). I guess at least the former just need a
> > dpkg-buildpack
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:10:03AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Thanks for your hint, I didn't know clusterssh. Just checked it out
> > and it does pretty much the same (and has more options), so I close
> > the ITP for multixterm hereby.
> As I understand the description of "clusterssh" rig
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:11:29PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
(shortening cc:-list)
> > clusterssh opens xterms with ssh sessions, multixterm opens multiple
> > xterms (with whatever contents). So if you want to control several
> > xterms at the same time that are not ssh sessions multixterm
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:12:36PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
> warnings[2], linda report similar warnings. I don't know what's the
> most proper way to deal with these warnings.
>
> [2]
> $ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
> W: q
One of my packages is in the new queue, and now it needs a tiny
change (a library it build-depends on changes it's package name).
Can I use the same Debian revision for the updated package or do I
have to bump the revision number (or is there anything else to do
this)?
TIA,
gregor
--
.''`. htt
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 06:52:43PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:17:17PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > One of my packages is in the new queue, and now it needs a tiny
> > change [..]
> Simply upload new package with bumped revision
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the three packages listed below;
my last sponsor is busy at the moment (thanks for your help until
now!) therefore I'm asking here. The packages are:
* fullquottel
fullquottel is in testing and unstable, the new version fixes a
wishlist bug (#356375), the only c
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 03:16:50PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Normally I use wget --mirror --no-parent to get the source
> > files. So if you do your RFS, enable directory listing on
> > your server (or in package directory), post the exact link
> > of every file in the mail so we can mark
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 12:30:10AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Oh one moment you are right. I havent yet tried dget but is
> dget just generating the file names by itself and downloads
> it?
No.
man dget:
"... it fetches the given URL and recursively any files referenced,
if the URL points to
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:08:38PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
One week later I would like to politely ask again for sponsors for
the following 3 packages:
> * fullquottel
> * mimetic
> * mailtextbody
> All packages can be downloaded from
> http://www.toastfreeware.priv.at/
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 07:49:13PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > * fullquottel
> > fullquottel is in testing and unstable, the new version fixes a
> > wishlist bug (#356375), the only change in the package is the
> > description.
> Uploaded.
Thanks a lot!
By coincidence Tony Mancill did an upl
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 01:27:10PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> I'd like to build my debian packages out of my repository, so I've added the
> following in my debian/rules... Is there a better, standardized way to do
> this? (I've already looked at cvs-buildpackage, but I want to move away from
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:58:29 +0200, Vedran Fura? wrote:
> >> The upstream doesn't provide any version information so there shouldn't be
> >> any problem if I fake new upstream releases: 1.0-1 -> 1.1-1 -> 1.2-1 .
> > Can't you use dates then? Like MMDD-a?
> No problem, but one question, just
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:05:14PM +0530, Prasad Ramamurthy Kadambi wrote:
> I'm ready with my package festival-te. How do I send it to alioth or any
> other Debian server?
Alioth is for (often collaboratively maintained) projects, I guess
there's no registered festival-te project there. More inf
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:36:02 +0530, Prasad Ramamurthy Kadambi wrote:
> How do I upload package for debian-in.alioth.debian.org ? I have an account.
> It would be helpful if you can point out docs for svn-buildpackage.
Take a look at
file:///usr/share/doc/svn-buildpackage/HOWTO.html/index.html
HT
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:45:42 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> I have one watch file with the following lines:
>
> version=3
> ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
>
> Doing an uscan --verbose, I get:
[..]
> What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP di
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 02:18:02 +0100, Ian Beckwith wrote:
> I'm (still) seeking a sponsor for libmp3-tag-perl (MP3::Tag, a perl
> module for reading and writing ID3v1 and ID3v2 tags in mp3 files).
I'm not a DD, so I can't upload your package.
But maybe you'd like to join the Debian Perl Group and
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:03:24 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I have for all of my tools/packages manpages (de and fr too) and
> using dh_installman wich works perfectly.
> Now I have read I must register manpages from the "postinst" script.
"Registering" sound a bit like doc-base. If I'm correct
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:19:09 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am working on a package which contains MSWord documents. I was wondering
> the following questions:
> 1) How can I know if they are redistributable at all, for instance if
> they contain non-free fonts?
TTBOMK MS Office files don't co
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:01:27 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, thanks. But my tool dont need pipes and my pw.txt file looks like this:
> password01
> pass02
> andmore
>
> pwgen output file looks likes:
> password pass02 andmore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pwgen -1 10 10 > pwd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:39:34 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> - convert doc-control to UTF-8 since it contains character (ö) which is not
> present in iso-8859-1 if I'm not mistaken about the current encoding.
'ö' is longer in iso-8859-1 than utf-8 even exists ;-)
But I agree that the files in deb
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:19:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> indeed, I just noticed the following :
>
> sorbet???~???$ apt-cache show latex2html
> Filename: pool/non-free/l/latex2html/latex2html_2002-2-1-20050114-5_all.deb
> ^
> Do you think that there are other converters a
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:07:48 +0100, Dario Minnucci wrote:
> Does anybody knows where to find some guidelines to build a 'web application
> package'?
http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : debian: the
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:31:28 +0200, Michel Barret wrote:
Bonjour Michel,
> My name is Michel. I want help Debian and as I'm computer studen maybe can
> developpe for Debian!
[..]
> So can I help anybody? What can I make to Debian?
Thanks for your offer!
For getting ideas about how to get invo
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:43:51 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> I am looking for some tricks for generating patches for the debian source
> packages.
Take a look at interdiff and/or debdiff (in package devscripts).
http://women.debian.org/wiki/English/AdvancedBuildingTips has some
hints, too.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:10:59 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > I adopted a web application package that used to set a symlink under
> > /var/www: /var/www/phpmyadmin -> /usr/share/phpmyadmin. This was not good:
> > we shouldn't touch /var/www and not enable phpmyadmin without asking.
> Why? What is
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:23:27 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> CEGUI::Exception: DynamicModule::DynamicModule - Failed to load module
> 'libCEGUIDevILImageCodec.so': libCEGUIDevILImageCodec.so: cannot open shared
> object file: No such file or directory
> CEGUI Exception occurred : DynamicModule::
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:00:40 +0200, Giorgio Pioda wrote:
> Download: http://web.ticino.com/gfwp/debian/qgfe-1.0/
I'm not a DD, but here go some short remarks on your package:
* debian/README.Debian is an empty template and can possibly be
removed.
* All the debian/foo.ex files seem to be unuse
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:12:33 +0200, Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. wrote:
> I really enjoyed svn-buildpackage. Is there a similar system for hg /
> Mercurial?
$ apt-cache search --names-only "\-buildpackage"
[..]
hg-buildpackage - Suite to help with Debian packages in Mercurial archives
(Never used it.
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:17:06 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > If the source package contains debian/bin/harvestman then debian/install
> > can contain this line: debian/bin/harvestman usr/bin/
> Unfortunately, the source package does not contain such a file.
Bart was talking about the _Debian_ _s
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:25:53 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> I'm trying to make a package that depends on xmame that is in non-free,
> the program under GPL and so I think it can uploaded to main,
If it depends on a package in non-free your package has to go to
contrib.
Cf. Debian Policy 2.2
>
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:24:27 +0100, Michael Stummvoll wrote:
> On 24.01.2012 02:55, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing
> > support for this into reportbug:
[..]
> How would I tag a sponsorship request of an ITA-Package? It matches neith
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:28:49 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its
> previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this
> package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds
> fine on the pbuilder clean chr
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:51:47 -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > In practice, how does a request for sponsorship appear at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;dist=unstable
> > ?
> I'm CC'ing the list again, because I think this is worthwhile to
> everyone (and
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:35:53 +0100, Savvas Radevic wrote:
> 1. If I have an already open bug in wnpp, do I close it or merge it with
> the one in s-r (=sponsorship-requests)?
No, they are independent. The WNPP bug is about the package itself,
and the SR bug is about sponsoring.
> 2. If I have a
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:44:02 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> We could ask listmasters to filter out BTS bot messages. Now, there
> are certainly people (e.g. me) who do want to see control messages.
> But they could always subscribe to sponsorship-requests via PTS.
> What do others think?
I'm happ to
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:00:55 -0600, Paul Elliott wrote:
> The untimate source of my project is a windows programer who GPLed. He
> thought
> it would be a good idea to write the documentation in windows word .doc file!
> Bad move.
> The only free program that I can find to convert this document
tag 659854 + confirmed
owner 659854 !
thanks
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:08:00 +0100, Florian Schlichting wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vpnc":
> dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r512-1.dsc
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/vpnc
This looks ver
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:45:33 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> In case someone is tempted to try Build-Depends like "check | dpkg",
> it doesn't work at all in pbuilder which is smart enough to notice that dpkg
> is already installed so it never pulls 'check'.
And it also doesn't work -- the other
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:48:18 +0100, Dennis van Dok wrote:
> Now I can think of several ways to fix this:
>
> - use something other than dinstall
> - change the .changes file before using dput (breaks signing)
> - use --debbuildopts=--changes-option=-Ddistribution=squeeze
- change the distributio
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:29:48 +0100, Dennis van Dok wrote:
> > - change the distribution in debian/changelog before building:
> > "debchange -D $dist "
> Thanks, but this complicates my procedures. After calling debchange
> I'm left with a modified tree and svn-buildpackage will complain I
> have
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:14:28 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> dget uses dscverify to check the signature. dscverify only uses the
> debian-keyring.gpg and debian-maintainers.gpg keyrings located in
> /usr/share/keyrings by default, so it will not see any keys you imported
> unless you tell it to
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:47:44 -0400, Bilal Akhtar wrote:
> liboauth (0.9.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New upstream release (Closes: #650138)
I can't confirm this.
Both the bti in unstable and a bti rebuilt against 0.9.6-1 fail with
liboauth0 0.9.6-1 installed with the same error as before
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:15:04 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> similarly to the plink case I can not found an easy solution for this
> problem.
> alphabet.h:48:3: error: 'reverseInPlace' was not declared in this scope, and
> no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of
>
On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:22:46 +0200, Olе Streicher wrote:
> 8<-
> override_dh_autoreconf:
> sed s/libast/libstarlink_ast/g -i Makefile.am
> AUTOMAKE="automake --foreign" dh_autoreconf
>
> override_dh_clean:
> sed s/libst
On Thu, 10 May 2012 13:18:42 +0200, Olе Streicher wrote:
> I have the same problem in another package: here, an executable is going
> to be renamed, and therefore also the manpage. Additionally, the manpage
> needs a patch. Since the manpage is renamed, unpatching it after build
> fails.
Not sur
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:27:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:58 AM, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote:
> > I want to adopt this package because I'm planning to ITP
> > the package (rt-extension-calendar) which depends on this
> > library.
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:48:21 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > Then you can do also (from cdbs package):
> > /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
> I don't use cdbs myself, so that's something I'm not familiar with.
> (Nor can I find how it's actually used, as there is no man page that I
> can f
On Sun, 06 May 2012 23:26:43 +, Frédéric Brière wrote:
> On Sun, 06 May 2012 20:01:27 +0200, Alexander Toresson wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.5-1 of the package
> > "fceu".
> What a coincidence, I was just about to send you an email with various
> comments on yo
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:39:33 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> What about creating a list as owner of the pseudo-package dedicated to
> BTS traffic (including control messages) named
> sponsorship-requests@l.d.o. Furthermore, the mentors list should still
> get bug traffic (only). Therefore we would subsc
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:37:45 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> > [java] No protocol specified
> > [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't
> > connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY
> > variable.
> I had similar problems that I sol
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:28:39 +0200, Alexander Toresson wrote:
> > - The changelog doesn't mention if this is a hostile takeover, a
> > friendly salvage or whatever of the package.
>
> I want this to be as friendly as possible, but so far Joe hasn't been
> very responsive at all. In fact, even th
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:04:13 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "coinor-ipopt". It contains
> a fix for #662236 which caused its removal from testing.
I looked at the package now, and there's one that doesn't make me
happy:
The "old" packages has:
Depen
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:58:45 +0200, Julian Wollrath wrote:
> since I offered Patrick Winnertz, the maintainer, to co-maintain about two
> weeks ago and he was also CC'ed in parts of this thread but got no response
> from him, I am hoping someone could sponsor my updates to the powertop
> packag
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:29:09 +0200, Julian Wollrath wrote:
> thank you for your comments. I uploaded a new version of my packaging to
> http://rbw.goe.net/jw/ which addresses all of your comments.
Thanks!
> > - some other changes in d/control are also not mentioned
> If you mean the dependency
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:32:35 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
> * gregor herrmann [120625 22:19]:
> > The "old" packages has:
> > Depends: libmumps-4.9.2 (>= 4.9.2) | libmumps-seq-4.9.2 (>= 4.9.2), ...
> > After the changes the dependency is:
> >
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:42:19 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> I'm personally not a fan of DEP5, because I have not yet seen any benefits,
> only more work for the packager, and less readable for humans than plain text.
Side remark: I personally find a structured Copyright-Format 1.0 file
much easier
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:05:02 +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> I need a sponsor in order to upload an updated package which resolves an RC
> bug.
> I'm quite surprised nobody has stepped in before.
> Bug number is #681654.
Why are you surprised?
There's a dicsussion in the bug log that sho
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:24:14 +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
> >* why libcurl4-gnutls-dev | libcurl4-nss-dev | libcurl4-openssl-dev ?
> >shouldn't that be something simplier like libcurl4-dev ? libcurl-dev ?
> >libcurl-ssl-dev ?
>
> If I use "libcurl4-dev", "libcurl-dev" or "libcurl-ssl-dev", I
>
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:30:22 +0200, Jose G. López wrote:
> > I had a look at libcdk5 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-10-08 19:09. The
> > file debian/copyright is not yet complete, see for example include/button.h
> > with "Copyright 1999, Grant Edwards". The name Grant Edwards is also
> > me
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:40:30 +0100, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
> I am working on the devilspie package - which has a release mentioned
> and linked in the last entry on Ross Burton's blog -
> http://www.burtonini.com/
>
> I do however have problems getting a watch-file reading the folder
> where t
+ doc-linux-fr-2005.08/debian/changelog 2012-11-18 18:35:06.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+doc-linux-fr (2005.08-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+
+ [ Ivo De Decker ]
+ * Remove build-depends on mirror. Closes: 691570
+
+ [ gregor herrmann ]
+ * Set Maintainer to Debian QA Group
Control: tag -1 + pending
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:32:46 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Please fix #677786 using the patch to the bug log in message #12. I
> suggest delayed/7 to give the maintainer some more time to react. That
> bug blocks RC bug #677762.
Uploaded to DELAYED/7.
Please close this
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:08:24 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > lftp hasn't been uploaded or removed, so this bug shouldn't be closed. It
> > might be a problem is some script, because mentors has 2 versions of lftp: a
> > version for sid, and a version for testing-proposed-updates.
> However, are you
tag 656301 + patch
tag 692261 + patch
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:34:59 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > thanks for your interest in xarchiver. I haven't found a sponsor yet, so
> > please go ahead!
> Uploaded! Thanks for your work!
Hm, where d
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:09:41 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > I think fixing the two minor bugs is covered by point 4 of the freeze
> > policy. It's a win-win situation and it comes without altering one
> > single line of code.
> > http://r
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:59:33 +0100, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "subnetcalc". subnetcalc is a
> simple
> IPv4 subnet address calculator. For given IP address and netmask, it
> calculates network address, broadcast address, maximum number of hosts and
> h
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:37:50 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'd
> personally tend to say that, doing the above and assuming my
> characterization is correct, it would be okay to put that in main.
Another precedent (and quite similar, since it's also an application
for a mobile phone, just symbian i
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:30:35 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > AFAICS the source package contains the source for
> > gnapplet but it's not built but the pre-compiled .sis is installed
> > into /usr/share/doc/gammu/symbian/.
> I see. And gammu is in main?
Yes, that's what `apt-cache policy gammu'
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:54:12 +, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > I suppose that's ok, but I'd check with the ftp-masters before
> > uploading.
> Alright, who should I contact? ftpmas...@debian.org?
Yes, that's the official address according to
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
Cheers,
grego
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:45:39 +0200, Laurent Léonard wrote:
> I'm searching for some "standard" templates for README.source about:
> - DFSG changes
> - Quilt usage (reference to /usr/share/doc/quilt/README.source ?)
> - Other files removed from the original tarball for various reasons
For packages
1 - 100 of 314 matches
Mail list logo
