Bug#1095671: installation-reports: 4 possible issues installing Xfce with debian-12.8.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso

On 12/02/2025 at 21:18, Holger Wansing wrote: mag...@autistici.org wrote (Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:24:35 +): The installation report below didn't make it to the list even though I attached the syslog and partman files compressed. The total mail size is almost 400 kB. I guess it is above the ma

Bug#1095671: [ #1095671 ] Fwd: installation-reports: 4 possible issues installing Xfce with debian-12.8.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso

t clicking on "Reload" > there was immediately an error about the DVD indexes. I > "solved" this by commenting out the following line in > /etc/apt/sources.list: > > deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 12.8.0 _Bookworm_ - Official > amd64 DVD Binar

Bug#1095671: [ #1095671 ] Fwd: installation-reports: 4 possible issues installing Xfce with debian-12.8.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso

ginal Message Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB Image version: https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/12.8.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-12.8.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso Date: 2025-01-09 Machine: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_F515EA Processor: 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(T

Re: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Accepted protection-domain-mapper 1.0-6 (source amd64) into unstable

Hi, Le 04/02/2025 à 11:10, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : OK, thanks. In the end, having packages around is not going to be sufficient anyway, they would need to be made available in this or that image, and integrated in some way (hardware detection → software dance at the right moment(s)), maybe it

Re: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Accepted protection-domain-mapper 1.0-6 (source amd64) into unstable

Hi, Arnaud Ferraris (2025-02-06): > I was expecting something along those lines indeed. TBH I'm expecting the > person who submitted #1076725 and #1076726 to work on that, especially as I > don't own any hardware d-i images could target using those packages. Alright, thanks for clarifying. > >

debian-installer-utils_1.152_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 22:46:29 +0100 Source: debian-installer-utils Architecture: source Version: 1.152 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System

Processing of debian-installer-utils_1.152_source.changes

debian-installer-utils_1.152_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-utils_1.152.dsc debian-installer-utils_1.152.tar.xz debian-installer-utils_1.152_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Bug#879106: marked as done (debian-installer-utils: "list-devices disk" should consider persistent memory block devices)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 22:20:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#879106: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.152 has caused the Debian Bug report #879106, regarding debian-installer-utils: "list-devices disk" should consider persistent memory block devices to be

Re: Add option in Debian installer to skip secure delete step

Marc Haber writes: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 07:52:12PM +, josesanchez2782 wrote: >> Hello, I would like to suggest a new option in the Debian GUI installer. >> Currently, when you enable full disk encryption with LUKS, it automatically >> overwrites all the bits in th

Re: Add option in Debian installer to skip secure delete step

On 30/01/2025 at 21:28, Marc Haber wrote: On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 07:52:12PM +, josesanchez2782 wrote: Hello, I would like to suggest a new option in the Debian GUI installer. Currently, when you enable full disk encryption with LUKS, it automatically overwrites all the bits in the drive in

Re: Add option in Debian installer to skip secure delete step

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 07:52:12PM +, josesanchez2782 wrote: > Hello, I would like to suggest a new option in the Debian GUI installer. > Currently, when you enable full disk encryption with LUKS, it automatically > overwrites all the bits in the drive in the secure delete st

Add option in Debian installer to skip secure delete step

Hello, I would like to suggest a new option in the Debian GUI installer. Currently, when you enable full disk encryption with LUKS, it automatically overwrites all the bits in the drive in the secure delete step before enabling LUKS and installing Debian. Although this is more secure because

Bug#1092968: debian-installer: LUKS encrypted installation does not use /etc/crypttab to decrypt other drives

> I wasn't doing anything especially weird (other than using Linux & > encryption), systemd-cryptsetup should be a dependency of cryptsetup > to make the OS work like it is designed to do. +1 And please note that the problem occurs not only when the user creates an encrypted swap partition manual

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:13:24 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote: ... > > if I had a knowledge about d-i internals. :-< > > I think (I wanted but I'm not sure I did…) I said I would look into > this after Trixie Alpha 1, so if you don't mind waiting a little, > I'll look into it eventually… Thanks! I'm

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Hi, Kentaro HAYASHI (2025-01-20): > > It seems that fixing gtk-set-font is not enough, need to reboot > > /sbin/debian-installer (or something), but it causes flickering > > (blackout) and > > need to re-process localechooser (select language again) > > It might be

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@debian.org > It seems that fixing gtk-set-font is not enough, need to reboot > /sbin/debian-installer (or something), but it causes flickering > (blackout) and > need to re-process localechooser (select language again) > It might be annoying. > > How sh

Bug#1092978: marked as done (debian-installer: netinst installer uses efi partition from another disk)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:37:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092978: fixed in partman-efi 108 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092978, regarding debian-installer: netinst installer uses efi partition from another disk to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#969516: F2FS support in Debian installer

ct ? (so fine on a phone or tablet that has battery and knows the power state, not so fine on a generic PC). But fine on a laptop PC. On a drive with built in management of the flash, as any SSD used in a PC has, ext4 is a much better choice than F2FS with better performance and better reliabi

Processed: Re: Bug#969516: Debian and Ubuntu developers hesitate and procrastinate with F2FS innovation 13 years

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + wontfix Bug #969516 [debian-installer] Please support installing onto f2fs root filesystem Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 969516: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969516 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#969516: Debian and Ubuntu developers hesitate and procrastinate with F2FS innovation 13 years

so fine on a generic PC). > >On a drive with built in management of the flash, as any SSD used in a >PC has, ext4 is a much better choice than F2FS with better performance >and better reliability. > >So Debian and Ubuntu have sensibly not bothered to offer the user the >choice

Bug#786428: marked as done (debian-installer: room for improvement for "non-free firmware" dialogs)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:07:00 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: #786428debian-installer: room for improvement for "non-free firmware" dialogs has caused the Debian Bug report #786428, regarding debian-installer: room for improvement for "non-free firmware

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:16:17 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI wrote: > Hi, > > > > > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5 > > Updated to decompress font on demand. > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

Hi, Andreas Tille wrote (Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:20:19 +0100): > > Also, if you would like to adapt the wording of the dialog, feel free to > > tell me. > > Please spell Blend in > "Choose a Debian _b_lend for installation > with upper case _B_ (its a noun). > &

Bug#1092977: debian-installer: systemd-cryptsetup package not installed on encrypted system

On 14/01/2025 at 02:51, Dave wrote: (Possible dupe of 1092968) Possible. I installed Debian testing from a live CD. During the installation process, I set up 2 encrypted partitions: - btrfs on LVM on LUKS for the root file system - swap on an encrypted partition with a random key

Bug#1092978: debian-installer: netinst installer uses efi partition from another disk

On 14/01/2025 at 04:04, Ted wrote: I installed Debian with "GNU/Linux trixie-DI-alpha1 _Trixie_ - Official Alpha amd64 NETINST with firmware 20241230-11:26" using the luks encrypted full disk partition scheme. It installed but the installer used an efi partition from another disk w

Bug#1092968: debian-installer: LUKS encrypted installation does not use /etc/crypttab to decrypt other drives

be covered by the installer… Cyril, I've been using full disk luks encryption on Debian, Ubuntu, even occasionally on Fedora, Arch & openSuse, sometimes even with a LVM for at least 10 years, and never had a problem opening and mounting other luks encrypted drives at boot using a keyfi

Bug#1092978: debian-installer: netinst installer uses efi partition from another disk

Package: debian-installer Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: veltf...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I installed Debian with "GNU/Linux trixie-DI-alpha1 _Trixie_ - Official Alpha

Bug#1092977: debian-installer: systemd-cryptsetup package not installed on encrypted system

Package: debian-installer Version: testing Severity: normal Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: therealmr...@duck.com Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? (Possible dupe of 1092968) I installed Debian testing from a live CD. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or

Bug#1092968: debian-installer: LUKS encrypted installation does not use /etc/crypttab to decrypt other drives

Hi Ted, Ted (2025-01-13): > Any installed system with luks encryption support should be able to > read and decrypt entries in /etc/crypttab with properly processed > keyfiles without installing additional packages. I understand it might have been a little frustrating that it didn't work out of t

Bug#1092949: debian-installer could propose installing linux-image-cloud when run inside a VM

Hi Gioele, Gioele Barabucci (2025-01-13): > currently d-i installs `linux-image-$arch` regardless of the kind of > machine it is installed on. That's the general idea but that's not really what's actually happening (devil, details, etc.). > When used inside a virtual machine, it could make sens

Bug#1092968: debian-installer: LUKS encrypted installation does not use /etc/crypttab to decrypt other drives

Package: debian-installer Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: veltf...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I did a full-disk luks encrypted installation using trixie-DI-alpha1 _Trixie_

Bug#1092949: debian-installer could propose installing linux-image-cloud when run inside a VM

Package: debian-installer Version: 20241227 Dear debian-installer developers, currently d-i installs `linux-image-$arch` regardless of the kind of machine it is installed on. When used inside a virtual machine, it could make sense to ask the user if they want to install linux-image-cloud

Processed: Bug#1089010: debian-installer: arm64, armhf cdrom do not set the selected keyboard layout

Processing control commands: > found -1 20230607+deb12u9 Bug #1089010 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [debian-installer] debian-installer: armhf cdrom initrd.gz does not set the selected keyboard layout Marked as found in versions debian-installer/20230607+deb12u9. -- 1089010: ht

Bug#1089010: debian-installer: arm64, armhf cdrom do not set the selected keyboard layout

Control: found -1 20230607+deb12u9 Bug #1089010 in debian-installer reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit

Bug#969516: Debian and Ubuntu developers hesitate and procrastinate with F2FS innovation 13 years

elieve, that equally dependable > will works on PCs with SSD. > > I read, that F2FS works on HDD the same reliably as on SSD. > > First release of F2FS was in year 2012. Now is Year 2025. Debian and Ubuntu > hesitate and procrastinate with F2FS innovation 13 years. It is so terrib

Bug#1034814: marked as done (debian-installer: bootable flag not toggling)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:26:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034814: fixed in partman-base 232 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034814, regarding debian-installer: bootable flag not toggling to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Hi, > > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5 Updated to decompress font on demand. https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/59 Created MR to generate fake font cache in advance. https://salsa.debian.org/installe

Re: Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:45:44AM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: >Hi Holger, > >On 31/12/2024 at 17:47, Holger Wansing wrote: >> > >> > I'd like to address special thanks to Holger Wansing who has done >> > a tremendous job wading through many proposed changes in various >> > installer components,

Re: Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

Hi Holger, On 31/12/2024 at 17:47, Holger Wansing wrote: I'd like to address special thanks to Holger Wansing who has done a tremendous job wading through many proposed changes in various installer components, in addition to coordinating translation efforts. Thanks for your warm words! I wou

Bug#969516: Debian and Ubuntu developers hesitate and procrastinate with F2FS innovation 13 years

; will works on PCs with SSD. > > I read, that F2FS works on HDD the same reliably as on SSD. > > First release of F2FS was in year 2012. Now is Year 2025. Debian and Ubuntu > hesitate and procrastinate with F2FS innovation 13 years. It is so terrible. > Debian and Ubuntu is

Bug#969516: Debian and Ubuntu developers hesitate and procrastinate with F2FS innovation 13 years

on HDD the same reliably as on SSD. First release of F2FS was in year 2012. Now is Year 2025. Debian and Ubuntu hesitate and procrastinate with F2FS innovation 13 years. It is so terrible. Debian and Ubuntu is in delay 13 years.

Bug#879106: debian-installer-utils: "list-devices disk" should consider persistent memory block devices

/dev/pmemXXX device. > > For example, > > # blkid > /dev/pmem0: UUID="2017-10-17-14-41-11-00" LABEL="ISOIMAGE" TYPE="iso9660" > > Currently, debian-installer will fail to find this block device, and > complain that the installer media cannot be fou

Blends added to Debian installer - please register your Blend

ote, that the last relevant change did not reach testing yet, so > > you > > will have to install sid from a trixie daily build image, to test this. > > Sounds really good > > > The usual, good old tasksel dialog now has an additional entry at the bottom > > &qu

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 12:44:45 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u9 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bookworm to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 12:44:45 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20230607

debian-installer_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 19:01:36 +0100 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u9 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install

Processing of debian-installer_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes

debian-installer_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20230607+deb12u9.dsc debian-installer_20230607+deb12u9.tar.xz debian-installer_20230607+deb12u9_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

debian-installer_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bookworm to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 19:01:36 +0100 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u9

Bug#1067107: #1067107 After installing debian 12.5 no login possible

Control: reassign 1067107 debian-live This is installation with Calamares installer, so re-assigning.

Processed: Re: #1067107 After installing debian 12.5 no login possible

Processing control commands: > reassign 1067107 debian-live Bug #1067107 [installation-reports] After installing debian 12.5 no login possible Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'debian-live'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #106

Bug#1067105: marked as done (After installing Debian wont let you in with a given User/Password combination)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2025 07:40:08 +0100 with message-id <7d61853e-2524-411a-8e50-8be222dcc...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: #1067105After installing Debian wont let you in with a given User/Password combination has caused the Debian Bug report #1067105, regarding After inst

Bug#1067105: #1067105After installing Debian wont let you in with a given User/Password combination

Hi Thomas, noone answered on your bugreport yet, sorry. That may be, because it was assigned to a not-existing package (there is no package with name "debian installer"). Thomas Schweikle wrote: > Package: Debian installer > Version: As on Debian live-CD/DVD for Debian

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

l sid from a trixie daily build image, to test this. Sounds really good > The usual, good old tasksel dialog now has an additional entry at the bottom > "Choose a Debian blend for installation" (this is not chosen by default) > [blendsel_1.png]. > > If you choose this [blen

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

need anymore) > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/55 Closed. replaced with MR!58 https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/58 Created MR for fonts-motoya-l-cedar. https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-motoya-l-cedar/-/merge_requests/1 Regards,

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

also cause wrong ownership in produced artifacts. Anything build by `dh_builddeb` will be sanitized correctly, but as I recall `debian-installer` does an extra non-deb artifact, which might want some review for builds *without* this patch (it might leak the building users name/uid into tarballs

Processed: Re: Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1091668 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root Added tag(s) pending. -- 1091668: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091668 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

cause wrong ownership in produced artifacts. > Anything build by `dh_builddeb` will be sanitized correctly, but as I recall > `debian-installer` does an extra non-deb artifact, which might want some > review for builds *without* this patch (it might leak the building users > name/uid into t

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

Cyril Brulebois: Hej Niels, Niels Thykier (2025-01-04): The transition has moved to the endgame and this bug is now RC. This bug is filed on the assumption that the remark in d/rules about a part of the code needing root is true. The provided patch (MR) explicitly has debian-installer opt-in

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

Hej Niels, Niels Thykier (2025-01-04): > The transition has moved to the endgame and this bug is now RC. This bug is > filed on the assumption that the remark in d/rules about a part of the code > needing root is true. The provided patch (MR) explicitly has > debian-installer o

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 13:32:24 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote: Package: debian-installer Severity: important Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net User: ni...@thykier.net Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue Hi, Filing this one to ensure it is on my bug radar for the MBF and for tracking status

Processed: Re: Bug#1089540: Discover wants to "upgrade" to Debian 9 from Debian 13

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 plasma-discover Bug #1089540 [discover] discover: Discover wants to "upgrade" to Debian 9 from Debian 13 Bug reassigned from package 'discover' to 'plasma-discover'. No longer marked as found in versions discover/2.1.

Bug#1089540: Discover wants to "upgrade" to Debian 9 from Debian 13

ackage: discover Version: 2.1.2-10.1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: kritom...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Ever since I updated to KDE Plasma 6, Discover offers the upgrade to Debian 9, while I am running Debian 13. See attached screenshot for details. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-29): > I've checked with 10pt MotoyaLCedar,VL Gothic and BIZ UDGothic. > > * MotoyaLCedar 9pt vs 10pt > 9pt: font typeface seems blurred, so it is a bit ugly. > 10pt: ugly blurred rendering was reduced. it has enough > readability and visibility as others. > > * VL

Processed: Bug#1091537 marked as pending in debian-installer

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1091537 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: make takes huge amount of time to show targets Added tag(s) pending. -- 1091537: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091537 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Re: Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

Hi, Thanks for providing Debian 13 alpha 1 :-D Unfortuneately, i am not able to get much further then to selecting which sound card to use. When i select one, it will just continue to ask what audio card to use. I tried the net and DVD1 iso files. reproduction: 1. Write iso to USB 2. boot

Re: Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

Hi Cyril, Am 31. Dezember 2024 17:10:43 MEZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois : >The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first alpha >release of the installer for Debian 13 "Trixie". > > >Foreword > > >I'd like to address special thanks to Ho

Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first alpha release of the installer for Debian 13 "Trixie". Foreword I'd like to address special thanks to Holger Wansing who has done a tremendous job wading through many proposed changes in various installer

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 13:23:59 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20241227+rebuild1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

FYI: I've uploaded some screenshot images to check tweaked font name and default font size with rootskel-gtk outcome. https://people.debian.org/~kenhys/bug-1037256/

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 16:06:36 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-13-netboot-arm64 debian-installer-13

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

> > And should the font size stay the same for Japanese? > > I'll check tweaked version later. I've checked with 10pt MotoyaLCedar,VL Gothic and BIZ UDGothic. * MotoyaLCedar 9pt vs 10pt 9pt: font typeface seems blurred, so it is a bit ugly. 10pt: ugly blurred rendering was reduced. it has

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

Package: debian-installer Severity: important Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net User: ni...@thykier.net Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue Hi, Filing this one to ensure it is on my bug radar for the MBF and for tracking status. The patch is at https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team

Bug#1091661: debian-cd: run a survey on included udebs

Package: debian-cd Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Hi, Spotted while building netinst images locally via easy-build: I was surprised to see fonts-* udebs included there. As far as I know, those are useful at src:debian-installer build time, and included via build/pkg

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

a.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-morisawa-bizud-gothic/-/merge_requests/1 > > * > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/55 > > Oh, in that case I think we'll really want to look into some > compression thing, since BIZUDGothic-Regular.ttf

Bug#1091537: debian-installer: make takes huge amount of time to show targets

; make returns a list of available targets in less times. >> >> If I'm missing something prerequisite, feedback is welcome. > > Thanks for turning this known problem into an actual bug report, that's > been detected a few days ago, and I've sent my las

Re: Bug#1091617: mdadm: broken debian-installer support

t From 10113f6f7b5e66a5e35af6d90df849c104500de4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cyril Brulebois Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 20:47:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix chroot detection (Closes: #1091617). This avoids displaying the systemd note when mdadm is getting installed within d-i. --- debian/changelog

Bug#1091617: mdadm: broken debian-installer support

Package: mdadm Version: 4.2-5 Severity: serious Tags: d-i Justification: breaks d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org [ X-D-Cc: -boot@ and -cd@ for awareness. ] Hi, Spotted by Steve while testing tentative Trixie Alpha 1 images: mdadm is broken, with a

Re: Bug#1091617: mdadm: broken debian-installer support

Control: notfound -1 4.2-5 Control: found -1 4.2+20230508-3 Sorry, missed that edit before submitting. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227.tar.xz debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64_20241227_all.deb debian-installer-13-netboot

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64 is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-arm64 is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-armhf is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-mips64el is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-ppc64el is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-riscv64 is NEW

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64_20241227_all.deb debian-installer-13-netboot-arm64_20241227_all.deb debian-installer-13-netboot-armhf_20241227_all.deb debian-installer-13

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes REJECTED

debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64_20241227_all.deb: trying to install to new, but could not find source (debian-installer-netboot-images 20241227) binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64 is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-arm64 is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-armhf is NEW

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

ault font, which goes away with MotoyaLCedar)? >(First paragraph, first line, towards the end.) Thank you for looking into this issue. Yes, there are many different typeface (glyph) were rendererd for Japanese. e.g. I've given it a talk before about this issue in local Debian meeting

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Hi, Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-28): > I've tried to fix with following MRs: > > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5 > * > https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-morisawa-bizud-gothic/-/merge_requests/1 > * https://salsa.debian.or

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

nstaller-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5 * https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-morisawa-bizud-gothic/-/merge_requests/1 * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/55 Regards,

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-28): > Using motoyalcedar would mean an extra 2 MB in the initramfs, which > looks like a lot compared to 3 MB for fonts-android-udeb, so maybe it'd > be worth thinking a little more about this before submitting a udeb > addition to src:fonts-motoya-l-cedar and adding it t

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-28): > Thanks, I didn't know that way yet. You're welcome! > Surely it seems better to do it there. Alright, I've built (many more but I'm only publishing) two mini.iso, one called “pristine” (without font-related changes) except it came with a +10 on the font size to h

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

> > Sorry, I think I was in the post-release cooldown and didn't follow up > at the time. If we wanted to change the font for a specific language, > that's something that's already supported with touching cdebconf. > > See src/usr/bin/gtk-set-font in the rootskel-gtk source package. Thanks, I di

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Hello, Kentaro HAYASHI (2023-07-15): > FYI: I've updated a PoC patch. Mainly the explanation of patch was updated. > > 0001-frontend-avoid-han-unification-for-Japanese-take2.patch Sorry, I think I was in the post-release cooldown and didn't follow up at the time. If we wanted to change the font

Bug#1091537: debian-installer: make takes huge amount of time to show targets

g report, that's been detected a few days ago, and I've sent my last reply to that thread just a few hours ago. You can find more details here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/12/msg00154.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/12/msg00161.html https://lists.debian.o

Bug#1091537: debian-installer: make takes huge amount of time to show targets

Source: debian-installer Severity: normal Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org, k...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? According to README [1], to know a list of available targets, need to execute "make", but it takes huge amount of times. * What e

Re: Slow 'daily-build' command (Was: Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid)

latti and zelenka (there the build is very fast, but got bumped from 1-2 minutes to 10+), between the 22nd and the 23rd as well. TL;DR: Yes, this issue impacts regular d-i daily builds and wastes time on porterboxes every night, it'd nice to rewrite the make introspection soon-ish. As mention

Processing of debian-installer_20241227_source.changes

debian-installer_20241227_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20241227.dsc debian-installer_20241227.tar.xz debian-installer_20241227_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1037186: marked as done (debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system)

Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2024 00:04:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1037186: fixed in debian-installer 20241227 has caused the Debian Bug report #1037186, regarding debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1089010: marked as done (debian-installer: armhf cdrom initrd.gz does not set the selected keyboard layout)

Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2024 00:04:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1089010: fixed in debian-installer 20241227 has caused the Debian Bug report #1089010, regarding debian-installer: armhf cdrom initrd.gz does not set the selected keyboard layout to be marked as done. This

debian-installer_20241227_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 10:14:03 +0100 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20241227 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Debian KDE SDDM login screen issue, possible bug

Linux Debian 6.1.0-28-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.119-1 (2024-11-22) x86_64 GNU/Linux Additional Debian bookworm 12.8 x86_64 Kernel: 6.1.0-28-amd64 DE: KDE Plasma 5.27.5 WM Theme: BreezeLinux Debian 12, KDE plasma desktop environment. Issue/problem. After I lock the screen, and I

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037256#20 Above Message #20 approach might be too ad-hoc, it might be better to investigate more generic alternative. just as PoC, it might be useful to apply custom style, but this is just an idea and not fully confirmed yet. >From 22ba16ddf1f7

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >