On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 09:21:25PM +0100, Matej Marko wrote: > F2FS is high quality file system which use millions Android phones on whole > planet earth. It is not any experimental unreliable file system, but F2FS is > big project. > F2FS works on Android very dependable and I believe, that equally dependable > will works on PCs with SSD. > > I read, that F2FS works on HDD the same reliably as on SSD. > > First release of F2FS was in year 2012. Now is Year 2025. Debian and Ubuntu > hesitate and procrastinate with F2FS innovation 13 years. It is so terrible. > Debian and Ubuntu is in delay 13 years.
F2FS was designed for raw nand flash drives, not managed flash as an SSD is. It is not tolerant of power failures (so fine on a phone or tablet that has battery and knows the power state, not so fine on a generic PC). On a drive with built in management of the flash, as any SSD used in a PC has, ext4 is a much better choice than F2FS with better performance and better reliability. So Debian and Ubuntu have sensibly not bothered to offer the user the choice to use a filesystem that would be a terrible idea to use in general. F2FS works just fine when used in the right place, which is on raw flash chips on devices with safe power supply. It does not work well in other settings. So what you read is either wrong, or you didn't understand the conditions that were listed as required to make it reliable. -- Len Sorensen