hey folks--
a few of us (Hydroxide, Clint, edrz, MrBeige, and myself) stayed after
the meeting today and sorted out some minor pentabarf updates to address
the issues raised by the dc10 CfP.
in particular:
* we removed all mention of tracks by removing the two existing tracks
(it had offered "d
Hey folks--
At the local team meeting yesterday, we talked a bit about the idea of
grouping some of the debconf talks (and other events) into
thematically-focused tracks [0]. To follow through with this, we'll
need coordinators for every track we run.
Hans and i came up with the following 6 sug
On 04/26/2010 03:35 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:38:00AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Just wanted to report back to the whole debconf team on the progress on
>> this front. If we get no takers for track coordinators before the talk
>> subm
hey debconf folks--
Sam Hartman had the attached request; he's doing good work putting
together a debian enterprise track. is there a way we can get him an
interface to the talks that would be more convenient for him?
--dkg
--- Begin Message ---
The only page I can use to look at event
hey folks--
Right now, as far as i know, the talks team for debconf 10 consists of 5
people, all of whom are (more or less) local to NYC: me, micah, hans,
kris, and biella. We welcome more members!
Members of the talks team all receive copies of mail sent to the
alias, which we are using for ta
Hey Folks--
As you may know, we are trying to organize some thematic groupings of
talks at debconf 10. We're calling these groupings "tracks".
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/Tracks
i put a call out on planet.debian.org recently asking for people to
coordinate a track if they're intere
[ please respect Followup-To: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org -- everyone
interested in talks should be subscribed on that list already, and talks
selection is not local business ]
On 04/30/2010 03:03 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Ok folks, its time for the big "Talks Selection Day" Accor
Hi Pablo--
On 04/30/2010 02:40 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> Question for DebConf-Team: if we get Rich Hickey to give a talk, does he need
> to go through the regular talk submission process? (We clearly won't get him
> to submit before the talk deadline ;-) What is the process you envision for
>
hi Andy and Frank--
I notice that someone anonymous has edited the description of the debian
community outreach track here:
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/Tracks
I'm hoping it was one of you two ;) I'm happy to see active work on the
track!
I have two concerns, though:
(a) it seems
Hi Sam--
Thanks for all the work you've been doing soliciting and vetting talks
for the Enterprise track for DebConf 10. For the parts of that work
which you feel are OK being public, it would be helpful if there was a
way that interested people (from the talks team and elsewhere) could get
a qui
Hi Reinhard and the rest of the debian multimedia folks--
On 05/01/2010 02:41 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 20:21:49 (CEST), Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> Hi IOhannes, Paul, and interested folk on the debian multimedia
>> packaging team,
>
>
Hi Adrian--
On 05/01/2010 09:03 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> I'm not sure what "track coordinator" means, but I think I could help a
> bit. If it's about being session chair, planning talks or stuff like
> this, I'd be in.
thanks! we'd love to have you working on this if you're up for it.
> Could
On 05/03/2010 05:22 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> The key idea of the retreat is for local people to get together to be
> able to talk about the apps and then we'll enter our ratings into
> penta. Then all who want to contribute on penta can do so, and we'll
> wait for all that. But it
On 04/30/2010 02:33 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> The current members of the talks team are listed at:
>
> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/Teams
>
> It currently says "+ others", an ambiguity i plan to remove shortly. If
> you want to help out the talks
On 05/03/2010 05:53 PM, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> That's quite easy to do; I have an email from Joerg Jaspert to last year's
> talks team (which I was on) explaining how the software works
If this could be posted publicly someplace (a web page?) that'd be
great! Is there any reason this needs to b
Hi Anthony--
Sorry, i just got this message right now (not sure why, but maybe the
debconf-team queue was backlogged?)
On 04/30/2010 05:32 PM, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So there are two tracks I think would be really interesting:
>
> * Debian on mobile devices (phones, slates, netbooks)
> * Deb
On 05/04/2010 12:44 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> I can help with this. I was in the talks team 2 years ago, and I guess it is
> same rating system?
great, thanks! welcome to the talks team. i have never done this
before, but i assume it's the same rating system used in previous years.
Richard just
hey debconf folks--
Just doing some web site triage on https://penta.debconf.org/, and found
three problems:
0) the X.509 certificate chain was mis-ordered (it is supposed to be
, but was being served as
). Ganneff just fixed this. Thanks, Ganneff!
1) the "DebConf resources" link on the front
On 05/05/2010 06:11 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> 1) the "DebConf resources" link on the front page points to
>> https://penta.debconf.org/resources.shtml, which is a 404 Not Found.
>> Maybe it's su
hi debconf folks--
Hydroxide meant to send the attached announcement to the whole team so
that we all know who has access to what capabilities. I'm re-sending it
on his behalf
Please speak up if you think you should have access which has not been
granted.
--dkg
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
hey folks--
I'm hoping to give a reportback from the talks team later this weekend,
as i offered in the meeting today. I also want to reiterate a call for
help if anyone else wants to review talks. If you can even review a
dozen talks, please reply here and we'll try to get you reviewer privs.
I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
leave one of the three categories in a "don't know" state.
for example, if i say "+" for all three categories (relevance,
actuality, acceptance), the score will be 50. (50 + 50 + 50)/3
if i say "+" for relevance and acceptance,
hey debconf folks--
This is my followup report on the talks team status for debconf 10.
The talks review and acceptance process is late, but we're working on
it. By this coming Wednesday, we expect to have each submission
reviewed by at least two people, hopefully more.
Those who are local will
re.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:46:38PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing this analysis! I think this touches on venue issues
> too; would you mind if we took the discussion public to d
Hi debconf people--
This is a reminder that the dc10 talks team is meeting today on IRC (and
local folks in person as well) at 23:00 UTC (7pm NYC time).
We'll meet on #debconf-team -- if it is too noisy there or we're
disturbing other organizers who don't want to hear about talks, we can
move the
The talks team had a meeting on #debconf-team this evening. Thanks to
everyone who showed up.
meetbot summary (and links to logs) are here:
http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2010/debconf-team.2010-05-26-23.07.html
I wanted to raise two distinct issues with the broader debconf team from
ou
On 05/27/2010 08:47 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:01:20AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> There was quite a bit of discussion about having a select few events
>> scheduled with no other concurrent events.
>
> What are the criteria for these &
On 05/27/2010 11:01 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> What do you think the criteria should be? Or would you prefer no
>> plenaries at all?
>
> I don't think I can answer this because I'm not yet s
On 05/22/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
> leave one of the three categories in a "don't know" state.
[...]
> Any thoughts on this? Am i misunderstanding something?
OK, i've looke
The headers on the dc10 schedule pages need updating; they still show
dc9 headers afaict:
https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc10
I have no idea who can fix this, but hopefully a ticket will help keep
it on the radar.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 05/28/2010 12:20 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> The Debian Day has been announced in 1st August in some free ad we got in a
> magazine, so looks like we should have it. (BTW, penta should say this and
> not only DebConf Day 1?)
indeed, thanks or bringing this up, Ana.
Is there a good link to pint
On 05/28/2010 01:13 PM, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
>> On 05/28/2010 12:20 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>>
>>> The Debian Day has been announced in 1st August in some free ad we got in a
>>> magazine, so looks like we should have it. (BTW, penta should say this and
>>> not only DebConf Day 1?)
>
> I think w
Hi micah--
Thanks for bringing this up!
On 05/28/2010 01:33 PM, micah wrote:
> Personally, I think Debconf can both get a bit boring if the 'relevance'
> is applied too strictly, and too de-focused if it is applied to
> broadly. To make a great conference there should be a balance, and I
> feel l
On 06/01/2010 10:38 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> > Another advantage [to having plenaries] might be to communicate specific
>> > concerns to the
>> > broader group, for example if we have a wrap-up session wi
On 06/01/2010 10:07 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> One of the things we wanted to use to outreach to the Columbia
> community was a list of talks - basically, announcing a conference and
> linking to some sample talks is better than just saying "there will be
> talks". So one of the things that some l
Hey folks--
as previous mails from micah and pablo pointed out, we are having our
talks team "final cut" meeting today (wednesday, 2nd June) at 7pm NYC
time (23:00 UTC).
Like last week, we'll be meeting on #debconf-team, and moving to
#debconf-talks if we find we're disturbing folks on #debconf-t
Hi debconf folks--
Ever write a bunch of code to solve a problem, get to the end of it, and
then realize there was a much better way you should have done it?
The dc10 talks team had a long meeting tonight [0], which i'm now pretty
convinced we did the Wrong Way, thanks mainly to my so-called
"lea
On 06/03/2010 03:47 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Ever write a bunch of code to solve a problem, get to the end of it, and
> then realize there was a much better way you should have done it?
>
> The dc10 talks team had a long meeting tonight [0], which i'm now pretty
>
Hi Ana--
Thanks for the thoughtful feedback.
On 06/03/2010 09:14 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 03:47:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> In writing up the mail for the "not accepted for scheduling" proposals,
>> it became apparent that we would
On 06/03/2010 01:42 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I've helped organized a bunch of conferences and selection processes and
> one thing that is clear is that the process never is anywhere close to
> where you'd like to be, largely because you are basically learning how
> to do it while you ar
Hi Micah--
Thanks, i think your mail describes what happened and why we're in a
tough/confused state right now.
I also like your proposal, though i have two outstanding questions about
it before i feel like going ahead with it in full:
On 06/03/2010 02:59 PM, micah anderson wrote:
> I would prop
On 06/03/2010 03:27 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I also like your proposal, though i have two outstanding questions about
> it before i feel like going ahead with it in full:
ugh. This is certainly not my decision to make, and i did not mean to
imply that it was. The above shoul
On 06/03/2010 04:00 PM, micah anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:27:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
>> On 06/03/2010 02:59 PM, micah anderson wrote:
>>> 2. send a reject notice to the bottom 20 that did not make the cut due
>>> to the ratings
>&
On 06/03/2010 03:27 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 06/03/2010 02:59 PM, micah anderson wrote:
>> I would propose that the best way forward, at this point, taking into
>> considerations all the discussions here and on IRC would be this:
>>
>> 1. send an acce
On 06/04/2010 12:37 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> We appreciate your interest and the time you invested in putting
> together your proposed event. Our talk selection committee felt
> your submission on its current form would not attract enough
> interest among the DebConf attendees and
i'd rather say
hey folks--
at the global-team meeting today, i volunteered to work on scheduling
the accepted talks for DebConf10.
I've never done this before, and would appreciate any advice or
assistance anyone has to offer. I'll almost certainly need reasonable
liaisons from the venue team, the video team,
Hi folks--
I'm going to try to work out a reasonable mechanism for helping people
arrange ad-hoc events during the conference. This will be something
like a wiki on which people can sign up for open slots for day X on day
X-1, which then gets published/announced somehow at some reasonable
cutoff
On 06/07/2010 02:44 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:32:41AM +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote:
>>> We've promised a schedule by June 15th, 10 days away. Advice from
>>> anyone who has done this before would be awesome.
>
> Didn't I gave advise last week or the week before last we
On 06/09/2010 11:59 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Andrew McMillan wrote:
>> I was involved in doing the scheduling for LCA 2010. What we did
>> was to write every talk onto a post-it note, and then we drew up a whiteboard
>> with columns for each day, and within
Hi Andrew--
On 06/05/2010 06:32 PM, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> As an alternative though, I can provide accounts on a caldav server. We
> can then create a calendar for each room, and events for each accepted
> talk, and move them around in much the same manner using a CalDAV client
> such as Evoluti
I completed the scheduling for DebConf10. You can all hate me for it now ;)
The schedule starts each day at 10:00am, and concludes at 5:30pm or
6:30pm, depending on the day.
Already, some concerns were raised on IRC about only having a 1hr gap
for lunch. If we want that lunch gap to be 1.5hrs i
On 06/16/2010 07:09 AM, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> Traditionally DebConf has been pretty lightly scheduled because of the
> huge value that comes from the people meeting and communicating over the
> meals, in the corridors, in the hacklab, and through the evenings.
Enough people have echoed this sen
On 06/16/2010 07:09 AM, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> Herding 250-odd DD's into a group photo does not fit in 30 minutes.
> You're lucky if it fits into an hour. Do you know who will be taking
> the photo? I've done it in the past, and am happy to do so again.
Aigars Mahinovs (cc'ed here) added the i
On 06/16/2010 01:45 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> Yes, I will handle that. Just give me a time slot and I'll try to find
> the best possible location among the available places and check the
> light conditions during the previous days, so that there are no
> surprises.
That sounds very reasonable.
On 06/18/2010 11:31 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> There are many other cheese shops where you can get excellent cheese
> for high prices.
I'm just changing the Subject of the thread here so i don't have a heart
attack every morning when i see a dozen new messages about debconf10
scheduling.
cheers, an
hey folks--
On IRC, biella brought forward a concern about the scheduling of Eben
Moglen's talk.
To address it, I'd like to propose Plan A: a shift of the schedules to
accomodate Eben's request to have his talk earlier than day 6:
* move eben's talk (641) from day 6 to day 3 -- keep same time a
On 07/08/2010 09:32 AM, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Quito, Equator, München, Germany and Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
at least in en_US, the first country mentioned is spelled Ecuador, not
Equator.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/08/2010 12:05 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> I was looking at the talk schedule and hours for John Jay (cafeteria),
> which we were likely going to use during debconf.
>
> B: 0700-0945
> L: 1130-1400
> D: 1700-1900
>
> Lunch overlaps well, with or without the changes from Monday's global
> meet
On 07/08/2010 06:49 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> How about, rescheduling M:
>
> * move pre-lunch events 30 minutes earlier and add 1 slot (start at
> 9:30, end at 12:30), move post-luch events 1 hour earlier (start at
> 14:00) and DO NOT have the half hour break from 16 to 16:30 (end at
> 18:0
On 07/08/2010 12:17 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ please Cc:-me on replies ]
>
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:20:26PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>> I added to the budget the donations from FFIS (~680USD) and we have
>> a drop out in queue A. This is 2000USD more, that means more money
>> because
On 07/08/2010 08:48 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
>> On 07/08/2010 06:49 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
>>> How about, rescheduling M:
>>>
>>> * move pre-lunch events 30 minutes earlier and add
On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> To recap the proposals:
>>
>> (0 is the status quo)
>>
>> 0: 10:00-12:00, LUNCH, 14:00-16:00, Break, 16:30-19:30
>>
>> M:
On 07/13/2010 05:24 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>>
>>>> To re
On 07/14/2010 03:50 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 13. Juli 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> None has been selected. schultmc was the only person good enough to
>> voice an opinion (he prefers Z). Of course, i'm assuming that marga
>> prefers M.
>
>
hey folks--
I swear i am not trying to open a can of worms here.
We had one big (messy, disastrous) round of talk reviews, accepted some
talks, and encouraged folks to organize not-accepted talks on-the-fly
during the conference with whatever unconference system we set up.
However, as predicted
On 07/14/2010 06:29 PM, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:12:23AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Could one person (only!) with write access please make this change and
>> report back when it is done? I could webmonkey click change it all, but
>>
On 07/15/2010 07:22 AM, Gabriella Coleman wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 02:11 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In order to reserve John Jay, we need to do it something like _now_...
>>
>> Is anyone opposed to brian and I working to reserve John Jay for
>> W/Th/F DebCamp and M/T/Th/F DebConf under the
On 07/15/2010 01:16 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Regarding the Schedule, it looks fine, BUT there shouldn't be
> something scheduled at the same time that the group photo. This was
> scheduled during the afternoon break and it's now parallel to 2 other
> talks.
Whoops, you're right. the prev
On 07/15/2010 03:30 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> Micah is correct. It can also be a 30-45m slot just before lunch or
> dinner, so that impact of delaying people for 5-10 minutes extra is
> minimal.
Any preference for a 9:30-10:30 slot vs. 11:30-12:30 ?
I've cleared up space on Thursday morning.
On 07/15/2010 05:04 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> The later spot, please. It would be bad to loose a bunch of people due
> to the early scheduling.
> I will try to find a place in the shade for the shoot (when I'll be on-site).
>
> If it makes scheduling easier, 12:00-12:30 should be sufficient tim
On 07/16/2010 02:06 AM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> -we need a homer (or somewhere else) to run dc10.debconf.org DNS (amongst
> other things (but far fewer other things than most years))
I can bring a low-power machine to run DNS if you like. I don't have
anything spare that remotely approache
On 07/15/2010 12:02 PM, Moray Allan wrote:
> I think changing the schedule depending on the day will confuse people, so
> unless there's a strong positive reason to change I'd suggest we keep things
> fixed.
With my scheduler hat on, i'm going to agree with Moray here. I also
don't think we want
Hi Michael--
On 07/07/2010 10:24 AM, Michael J Daniel wrote:
> Please consider moving the Debconf video training from the 6th day to
> the 1st day.
> This information will be more valuable to participants at the beginning
> of the conference,
> rather than when the conference is almost over.
Ar
On 07/20/2010 01:31 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> My thought was mainly to have them in a schedule somewhere. It didn't
> occur to me that penta wouldn't allow the same event to have multiple
> instances. I'll put in several training sessions to be scheduled during
> DebCamp.
Thanks. please
On 07/15/2010 05:51 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 05:04 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
>> The later spot, please. It would be bad to loose a bunch of people due
>> to the early scheduling.
[...]
> I lean toward the consistent schedule, but i'm open to feedback
I got the following message about penta from a friend. Could someone
with write access to the web site please look at fixing them?
(note that this user does not have the SPI root CA in their certificate
list)
thanks,
--dkg
On 07/20/2010 06:18 PM, a friend wrote:
> A blog directed me st
Hi Daniel--
On 07/21/2010 05:17 AM, D M German wrote:
> I submitted a proposal for a presentation and it was supposed to be
> accepted.
yes, your talk is on 2010-08-03 from 11:30 to 12:30 local time in Davis
Auditorium. For some reason, it had been marked as "not public", which
is why it was no
On 07/22/2010 04:23 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> For those who have two keys I think I'm only going to include the last 20
> characters of each key's fingerprint. The QR code is too complex otherwise
> (which makes it harder for mobile phones and other devices to scan it.)
For two keys, if spac
On 07/23/2010 08:55 AM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> I created 676 and scheduled it for Tuesday the 27th in Interschool.
Thanks for doing this, Eric.
> However, it shows up neither in the logged-in nor the exported versions
> of the schedule. I can create the others (Thursday in Davis ... maybe
On 07/23/2010 11:32 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 03:26:52PM +0200, Judit Foglszinger wrote:
>>> Isn't the email address the only useful unique identifier we have for
>>> people?
>>
>> Isn't the nickname?
>
> Nop, no everybody is in IRC or have a Debian login. I would like leav
I had a couple frustrating calls with Columbia facility about trying to
make the temperature more reasonable.
It's currently about 65°F, and it would be more reasonable to have it
targeted around 73°F or 74°F (sorry to the people who use reasonable
units -- it's better to communicate with folks ar
On 07/28/2010 07:23 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> * provide the speaker with water
> * not only tell the speaker, she has 10/5/0 minutes left, but also enforce
> this
> * tell the speaker in advance, that they actually only have $timeslot minus 5
> minutes available, so that people can breathe and c
Q and micah and i talked through the network configurations yesterday
and made some decisions about the network. These decisions were spurred
by some networking failures experienced by the video team that resulted
(afaict) in the loss of some video recordings (and the failure of some
live streams)
On 08/05/2010 01:19 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Yes indeed, let's hear it for Richard!
Yes: yay Richard! Richard, you have pulled this conference through in
so many ways that i can't even begin to count them.
Your work has been and continues to be very very much appreciated.
On 08/05/2010 03:58 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 03:25:57PM -0400, Gabriella Coleman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So anyone on the orga team who can be here for Sunday breakdown should.
>> I will send an announcement to debconf-announce seeking volunteers as well.
>>
>> We don't have a
On 08/09/2010 05:05 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> I've just gotten home and am probably going afk for some relaxation
> soon. But, I wanted to point out that only a few members of the DC10
> localteam were active in the debian vs debconf discussion (event 658).
> I hope that more of them can a
On 12/02/2010 05:19 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment_policy
>
> What are your thoughts on adopting some sort of thing? I think it's a
> good idea, and we can leave the adaptation and posting to some team
> who takes it on and reports back
On 12/12/2010 06:06 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> that's just diluting what harassment means.
This is perhaps why Richard re-titled the proposed policy "Standards of
Respect", and not "anti-harrassment" (yes, the subject of the thread is
different):
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/StandardsOfRespe
On 01/27/2011 07:34 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> Penta supports selecting both a "track" and a "event type" at the time
> of submission. You can see the DC10 fields here:
> https://penta.debconf.org/penta/submission/dc10/event/new
>
> I forget when the tracks were added... people on the talks team
On 01/27/2011 08:41 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> being currently at LCA 2011 for the first time in my life, I'm
> naturally inclined to look for best practices that we might want to
> adopt for DebConf.
>
> Here is one: have talks slot of 45 minutes + 15 minutes of *break*
> before the start
On 02/13/2011 02:25 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> report bug:
>> http://wiki.debconf.org -> OK!
>> https://wiki.debconf.org -> DC7 ?
>
> Not a bug, exactly as configured.
> debconf7.debconf.org has same IP and its using ssl
if the machine is running squeeze, we should be able to use SNI to
provide
On 02/14/2011 02:44 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> on the debian-www list we recently spoke about the idea to have a
> website related track during DebConf. I don't think it need to be
> directly only www.debian.org related, maybe name it "debian.org related
> webservices" which can be everything
On 03/17/2011 07:46 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> i just finished merging the blog and the reports svn into debconf-data
> preserving their entire history.
[...]
> I set the old locations inaccessible, so noone can accidently commit or
> work with them.
Thanks, Joerg! Could you update
http://www.
On 04/14/2011 04:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I always wonder what the difference might be. For me the field
> "Abstract" is clear. It should be mandatory. There might be some use
> for "Submission notes" which can be filled with notes to clarify the
> abstract or some other stuff but I usually
On 05/12/2011 02:58 AM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> It is fine if people use facebook/twitter/flickr/youtube/whatever to
> promote DebConf. If it is clear they are doing it on their own, it is
> NOT DebConf (or Debian) doing it.
>
> But our website should NOT ever include a non-free service. Either the
On 05/12/2011 11:13 AM, ValessioBrito wrote:
> Is not it important to monitor and encourage DebConf comments within
> these networks?
If you want to spend time on those networks, no one will stop you :)
However, the minute debian requires me to agree to the terms of service
of any of the groups y
On 05/23/2011 11:16 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Tuesday, 26th, Groupphoto at 15oo(?), Cheese+Wine party in the evening
Is there a specific reason (lighting, location, etc?) to choose 15:00
for the group photo? in earlier discussion within the talk , we had
talked about having it right after lunch,
On 05/23/2011 01:54 PM, Marcelo Gutierrez wrote:
> 2011/5/21 Ross Boylan
>
>> https://penta.debconf.org/dc9_schedule/events/392.en.html has this link
>> to the high quality video:
>>
>> http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2009/debconf9/high/904_Quality_Assurance_BOF.ogv
>> That
On 06/06/2011 10:26 AM, Leandro Gómez wrote:
> 2011/6/6 Martin Zobel-Helas
>
>> zobel@marra:~% host www.debconf11.debconf.org
>> Host www.debconf11.debconf.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
>
> Right. It should be http://debconf11.debconf.org. Thank you!
Thanks for catching this, Martin, and for fixing
On 06/08/2011 06:18 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Marinko,
>
> On Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2011, Marinko Tarlac wrote:
>> It would be nice if you can provide a small list which eq. exactly do we
>> need.
>
> 10-15 APs, same models and running OpenWRT prefered :-)
I believe Brian Gupta (here in NY) has
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
