On 06/03/2010 03:27 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 06/03/2010 02:59 PM, micah anderson wrote: >> I would propose that the best way forward, at this point, taking into >> considerations all the discussions here and on IRC would be this: >> >> 1. send an acceptance to all the currently 'accepted' talks in penta, we >> don't bother including the 'two main rooms' details. it was accepted, >> implementation details come later >> >> 2. send a reject notice to the bottom 20 that did not make the cut due >> to the ratings > > could you draft the rejection notice you're proposing someplace? > >> 3. accept in penta and send an acceptance email to the middle third that >> we had such a hard time deciding on last night, this email would be no >> different than #1 >> >> 4. we schedule Schipiro (414) along with the two main rooms
I haven't heard any objections to this plan. I've updated http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/TalkDecisionEmails to match the texts we talked about here. I propose we give MrBeige the go ahead to send the two batches of e-mails as soon as he has time to do so. --dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
