hey folks-- I'm hoping to give a reportback from the talks team later this weekend, as i offered in the meeting today. I also want to reiterate a call for help if anyone else wants to review talks. If you can even review a dozen talks, please reply here and we'll try to get you reviewer privs.
In addition to trying to touch base with my fellow talks team members,
i'm realizing i have a few questions myself about what is needed from
us. I've never done this work before, so i'd be curious to know what
more experienced people think here:
0) of the three axes of review, one of them "Actuality" seems to require
that we know the capabilities of the proposer. In many cases, i have no
idea if the proposer is actually capable of running the proposed talk.
What should i do with "Actuality" in this case?
1) in this process, what is the relationship between reviewing talks,
scheduling/placing talks, and accepting talks? that is, I'd love to
tell people "your talk is accepted", but i don't want to do that when i
don't know if we can accomodate them. Can i get some feedback from the
venue folks about how to coordinate this?
Thanks for any ideas or feedback y'all have. I'd be happy to learn from
past experience but i don't have much to draw from myself.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
