[Crowbar] Hydrogen pull requests?

Hi, There's a huge amount of pull requests for Hydrogen (30-40 would be my guess); is there any hope of them being merged? Some of them are very old (4 months!). If not, then we should really just close them. Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. __

[Crowbar] Closing pull requests opened against master

Hi, As the CB2.x development moved to opencrowbar in github, and as the master branches have been cleaned up, I'm closing the following pull requests which were for master (and are now unmerge-able): https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-provisioner/pull/259 https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-cind

Re: [Crowbar] Augmenting the DNS config in Crowbar

Hi, Le mercredi 05 mars 2014, à 11:24 -0600, John-Paul Robinson a écrit : > Hi, > > Our current Crowbar 1.5 jumpstarted fabric has the following config for > bind. I'd like to augment this by either adding fowarders to our local > DNS servers or by getting the admin-node hosted Bind to resolve d

Re: [Crowbar] applying system updates to crowbar 1.5 provisioned nodes

Le mercredi 12 février 2014, à 06:09 -0600, John-Paul Robinson a écrit : > What is is the recommended approach for applying Ubuntu updates to a > fabric provisioned with crowbar 1.5? > > I'm interested in applying patches and updates to get the systems up to > the 12.04.4 release, both the core Ub

Re: [Crowbar] crowbar 1.5 and live migrate

Hi, Le samedi 08 février 2014, à 08:07 -0600, John-Paul Robinson a écrit : > Hi, > > We have a crowbar 1.5 Essex deploy. There is nova api support for > live-migration but it appears libvirtd is not set up to listen on TCP > ports, this means the attempt to peer-migrate fails. > > Is this featu

[Crowbar] Branching for post-Roxy?

Hi, There's been a huge amount of work going on in Roxy in the last two months, and the progress we've made is amazing. Figures are just one part of the story, but a quick analysis show that there were 1035 commits between Pebbles and Roxy until today, and 690 of these commits occurred since Dece

Re: [Crowbar] ssh key problem at the nodes

Hi, Le jeudi 30 janvier 2014, à 13:25 +0200, Oğuz Yarımtepe a écrit : > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > Hi Oğuz, > > > > I don't know the current state of hydrogen (we focus on roxy, which > > works pretty well), but: > >

Re: [Crowbar] ssh key problem at the nodes

Hi Oğuz, I don't know the current state of hydrogen (we focus on roxy, which works pretty well), but: Vincent Le jeudi 30 janvier 2014, à 11:59 +0200, Oğuz Yarımtepe a écrit : > Hi, > > After compilinh the hydrogen iso with user privilidges and without errors, > i first burn the iso to usb and

Re: [Crowbar] iso build requirements and fixes

Hi, Le mardi 28 janvier 2014, à 09:49 +0200, Oğuz Yarımtepe a écrit : > Hi, > > After struggling i solved my problem. I tried both roxy and hydrogen branch > both requires a tftpbooth directory at the ~/.crowbar-build-cache. I made a > symbolic link to barclamps/provisioner/tftpboot/ and after th

Re: [Crowbar] OpenCrowbar Migration update

Le lundi 13 janvier 2014, à 11:53 +0200, Oğuz Yarımtepe a écrit : > Hi, > > > > There is pretty solid Havana support (with Ceph) in the roxy branch (not > > in the opencrowbar repos, but in the crowbar repo > > (https://github.com/crowbar). HA support is also coming. > > > > > Is there any releas

Re: [Crowbar] OpenCrowbar Migration update

Hi Oğuz, Le lundi 13 janvier 2014, à 09:00 +0200, Oğuz Yarımtepe a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:30 AM, wrote: > > > Another update… we discovered a fork collision between the > > crowbar/barclamp-crowbar and opencrowbar/crowbar repos that would have made > > it difficult for people to for

Re: [Crowbar] Rationalizing Crowbar Project Infrastructure for our new code base

Hi Rob, Your mail seems to indicate that Crowbar 1.x has reached the end of its life. This makes me really sad: I think we're proving this view is wrong on a daily basis, as you can see with the amount of changes going in Crowbar 1.x. I dare to say that its development has never been so fast, and

Re: [Crowbar] crowbar-utils repo moved to http://github.com/opencrowbar/crowbar-utils/

Hi, Le lundi 16 décembre 2013, à 23:30 -0500, Judd Maltin a écrit : > http://github.com/opencrowbar/crowbar-utils/ What is the opencrowbar github organization? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.co

Re: [Crowbar] state of roxy

Le jeudi 12 décembre 2013, à 23:34 -0600, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > Team, > Roxy is broken. > Deployment of crowbar on admin node of Ubuntu build fails apt_test and node > is red (failed state). > No merges can take place till this is fixed since no test results can be > trusted. > >

Re: [Crowbar] Pull requests for roxy -- how to move forward?

Le mercredi 11 décembre 2013, à 11:29 +, Adam Spiers a écrit : > In parallel, I'd like to know more about what's holding up the > automated smoketesting. I've previously offered to help with this, > but so far I haven't heard many screams for help :) Daniel would know the details. Vincent -

[Crowbar] Pull requests for roxy -- how to move forward?

Hi, I initially wanted to summarize where we stand with pull requests, and list those that should be okay to go in, and those that need further review. But we reached a point where even doing this is just too painful: there are 114 pull requests opened right now; I would estimate that 90 of them o

Re: [Crowbar] How to change admin node password?

Le mardi 26 novembre 2013, à 15:02 -0800, Jonathan Brownell a écrit : > I would like to change the password of the "crowbar" user on my admin > node so that it is not left at a value that's readily known and > accessible by anyone with Crowbar experience. > > However, when I set it to a different

Re: [Crowbar] Nova Comp. Perf. issue (also "how to modify recipes in crowbar")

Hi Shane, Le vendredi 22 novembre 2013, à 13:58 -0800, Shane Gibson a écrit : > All, > > We have a few clusters up and running now, being built by Crowbar 1.6.1 > (mesa branch, build 3860, w/ Dell specific BIOS/RAID barclamps). The > clusters have all been performing extremely poorly from a nova

Re: [Crowbar] repo cleanup

Hi Rob, Le mercredi 20 novembre 2013, à 18:24 -0600, rob_hirschf...@dell.com a écrit : > How do we address that CB1 and 2 are so different that the docs can't cover > both? This seems very confusing to me. If you're talking about doc living in git: they'd just live in the right branch, so no i

Re: [Crowbar] Tomorrow's Design Call

Le mardi 19 novembre 2013, à 16:13 -0600, simon_jake...@dell.com a écrit : > All, > > Tomorrow's design call is taking place at 10am CT, for call details > please see: http://bit.ly/1bOcIYS. We'll likely discuss the efforts > around the repo consolidation. Also, please note that sharing may lag >

Re: [Crowbar] Wrapping upstream stackforge cookbooks (proof of concept)

Le mardi 01 octobre 2013, à 12:35 -0500, rob_hirschf...@dell.com a écrit : > Ionut, > One of the major objectives for CB2 work has been to embrace the attribute > injection style of cookbook so that we can align with Stackforge. I remember that we mentioned we'd do that post-Grizzly, even in Crow

Re: [Crowbar] SledgeHammer Log Files Location - Pebbles

Hi Randy, They're in /var/log/crowbar/sledgehammer/ for me. I assume you've already looked there, though. Is the directory existing or not? Vincent Le vendredi 27 septembre 2013, à 09:01 -0500, randy_perry...@dell.com a écrit : > I am trying to find the log files for SledgeHammer in pebbles. On

Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-ipmi] Cleanup of errors related to ipmi_si [1/2] (#56)

Hi, The pull request got merged last week without review about SUSE support (without smoketesting, and again without much time between the pull request being opened and the merge). I don't know enough about IPMI, to know if it's right or not, but on the other there's not much explanation on the c

Re: [Crowbar] RHEL/CentOS pull requests merged without any +1 from our side

t; am sorry, I jumped the gun on these. This was a bad call ?C please do not > blame Rajini as it was my bad. If it is a serious enough situation feel free > to reverse those patches that need to be reworked. > > > -John T. > > From: Сергей Юдин [mailto:tsipa...@gmai

[Crowbar] RHEL/CentOS pull requests merged without any +1 from our side

Hi, The following pull requests got merged while they had no +1 from non-Dell people (and the +1 from Dell happened just before the merge, so with no time for anyone to react), and while there were comments that I feel were either not addressed or needed more discussion: https://github.com/crowba

Re: [Crowbar] Heat Barclamp

Le jeudi 19 septembre 2013, à 16:36 +0200, Dirk Müller a écrit : > Hi, > > at SUSE we've created a minimal Heat barclamp: > > https://github.com/SUSE-Cloud/barclamp-heat > > it currently works for pebbles/grizzly. I would like to push it under > the crowbar domain and maintain it there for Grizz

Re: [Crowbar] move community call Th to one hour later

Le lundi 16 septembre 2013, à 17:48 -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > To help with discussion on branching strategy, enclosed, please, find a > proposed branching diagram showing currently active and proposed branches > with their relationships. Would it make sense to have a diagram wi

Re: [Crowbar] My +1/-1 on pebbles pull requests

I forgot to mention: in case one of my pull requests needs to be rebased, anyone should feel free to take the code, rebase it and create a new pull request :-) Vincent Le vendredi 09 août 2013, à 17:53 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Hi, > > As I'll be leaving for two weeks, a

[Crowbar] My +1/-1 on pebbles pull requests

Hi, As I'll be leaving for two weeks, and as John was saying it would help him, here's a summary of my +1/-1 on pull requests given the state as of today. I'm happy to be overruled for any of them, but I'd appreciate if you could get agreement from Adam, Dirk, Ralf or Sascha before doing so :-)

Re: [Crowbar] Migration of proposals/roles on schema updates

All, I'll be taking a lack of comments as +1, so here's your last chance to comment on this :-) Vincent Le lundi 05 août 2013, à 13:26 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Hi, > > A few weeks ago, I started the work on allowing schema changes in > pebbles, without breaking

Re: [Crowbar] Merge Moratorium

Le mardi 06 août 2013, à 16:00 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Hi, > > Le lundi 29 juillet 2013, à 09:12 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > > Folks, > > > > I'd like to request a hold (moratorium) on updates to the Pebbles branch to > > give time t

Re: [Crowbar] Change in sledgehammer-common impacting more than Pebbles

ar/crowbar/pull/1891 If there's no objection against this, I'll re-submit the provisioner and logging changes later on. Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 16:45 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 09:30 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > > Folks, > > > &g

Re: [Crowbar] Merge Moratorium

Hi, Le lundi 29 juillet 2013, à 09:12 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > Folks, > > I'd like to request a hold (moratorium) on updates to the Pebbles branch to > give time to do some much needed triage on broken functionality. This will > enable more complete testing before new pull-req

[Crowbar] Barclamp to setup NFS mounts on nodes

Hi, We just pushed a nfs_client barclamp at https://github.com/SUSE-Cloud/barclamp-nfs_client In short, this allows to add NFS mounts to the nodes (by editing /etc/fstab and mounting them). If there's any interesting in having it hosted in the crowbar project on github, we'd be happy to move it

Re: [Crowbar] Quantum fixes for Mesa-1.6 - Pebbles has similar issues

Le lundi 05 août 2013, à 18:22 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Le lundi 05 août 2013, à 08:49 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > > The problem is centered on the quantum deployment. > > And again, I would ask: what is the exact issue? Does it just fail to > allocate flo

Re: [Crowbar] Quantum fixes for Mesa-1.6 - Pebbles has similar issues

Le lundi 05 août 2013, à 08:49 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > Vincent, > > Do you have the ability to run a smoketest on an Ubuntu deployment? I don't, but... (see below) [...] > All Barclamps will deploy up to and including nova. The nova smoketest fails > at the point of alloca

Re: [Crowbar] Migration of proposals/roles on schema updates

Le lundi 05 août 2013, à 13:03 +0100, Adam Spiers a écrit : > Vincent Untz (vu...@suse.com) wrote: > > Le lundi 05 août 2013, à 12:39 +0100, Adam Spiers a écrit : > > > Vincent Untz (vu...@suse.com) wrote: > > > > A few weeks ago, I started the work on allowing sch

Re: [Crowbar] Migration of proposals/roles on schema updates

Le lundi 05 août 2013, à 12:39 +0100, Adam Spiers a écrit : > Vincent Untz (vu...@suse.com) wrote: > > A few weeks ago, I started the work on allowing schema changes in > > pebbles, without breaking existing proposals. In short, there's a > > migration rake task that wil

[Crowbar] Migration of proposals/roles on schema updates

Hi, A few weeks ago, I started the work on allowing schema changes in pebbles, without breaking existing proposals. In short, there's a migration rake task that will update the proposal (and its matching role, if committed) to the updated schema. The need for this stems from the fact that we migh

Re: [Crowbar] Quantum fixes for Mesa-1.6 - Pebbles has similar issues

Le jeudi 01 août 2013, à 23:11 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Hi, > > Le jeudi 01 août 2013, à 09:05 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > > Vincent, > > > > The pull request Arkady mentioned on the community call this morning is: > > https://github.com/

Re: [Crowbar] Quantum fixes for Mesa-1.6 - Pebbles has similar issues

Hi, Le jeudi 01 août 2013, à 09:05 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > Vincent, > > The pull request Arkady mentioned on the community call this morning is: > https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-quantum/pull/108 This pull request does many different things. Would it be possible to know th

Re: [Crowbar] [pebbles] Allow passing an incomplete json when creating a proposal

Le jeudi 01 août 2013, à 16:44 +0100, Adam Spiers a écrit : > I just looked at this again in the light of my current work on > > https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-provisioner/pull/177 > > ... > > Vincent Untz (vu...@suse.com) wrote: > > Hi, > > >

Re: [Crowbar] GIT Tree Status

Hi John, Le lundi 15 juillet 2013, à 19:00 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > Folks, > > Apologies for leaving the Pebbles tree in a mess as I head home. I > merged a bunch (30+) pull requests today and the result is a borked > tree. I hope someone can apply the needed triage to make it

[Crowbar] [pebbles] Allow passing an incomplete json when creating a proposal

Hi, I just submitted this pull request, which I guess is worth discussing here: https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-crowbar/pull/589 Here's a copy and paste from the commit message: === Until now, when creating a proposal with some existing json, it was required that the json c

Re: [Crowbar] Smoke Testing - Merge Order

> -Original Message----- > From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 11:04 AM > To: crowbar > Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Smoke Testing - Merge Order > > Le vendredi 05 juillet 2013, à 17:45 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > > Le vendre

Re: [Crowbar] Smoke Testing - Merge Order

Le vendredi 05 juillet 2013, à 17:45 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Le vendredi 05 juillet 2013, à 17:04 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > > Hi John, > > > > Le vendredi 05 juillet 2013, à 09:23 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > > > Vincent, > > > &g

Re: [Crowbar] Smoke Testing - Merge Order

Le vendredi 05 juillet 2013, à 17:04 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Hi John, > > Le vendredi 05 juillet 2013, à 09:23 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > > Vincent, > > > > There are a LOT of pull-requests in the queue right now. I'd like to te

Re: [Crowbar] Smoke Testing - Merge Order

Hi John, Le vendredi 05 juillet 2013, à 09:23 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > Vincent, > > There are a LOT of pull-requests in the queue right now. I'd like to test > them in measured batches. > > Please can you suggest which PRs should be tested together? Sure, what about this: Rou

[Crowbar] Any point in making glance listen on admin network only?

Hi, We have the option of making glance available only in the admin network (bind to all addresses setting). I suspect this was done to disallow uploading images, but I'm not sure. However, nowadays, people can upload images through horizon, so that would not even work anymore. Is there any poin

Re: [Crowbar] Adding a public hostname attribute to each node

would be no default, so no change compared to current behavior. Vincent > > Thanks, > > Chris > > > -Original Message- > From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 4:12 AM > To: crowbar > Subject: [Crowbar] Ad

[Crowbar] Adding a public hostname attribute to each node

Hi, (this is for pebbles) Currently, we have nice automatic DNS entries created in bind on the admin node for the different nodes. This means that we get, for instance, a public.d52-54-00-fa-12-cb.$domain DNS entry for the d52-54-00-fa-12-cb. However, in the past, with SUSE Cloud 1.0, we realize

Re: [Crowbar] Pull-Request Review and Merge Process

Hi John, A few comments: Le vendredi 28 juin 2013, à 16:04 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > Proposed Process: > > a. All community participants/members are encouraged to provide patch > (pull-request) feedback > > a. On the mailing list > > b. Over IRC channel #crowbar

[Crowbar] Pebbles features depending on backport from Havana?

Hi all, I'm adding support for using SSL for the Quantum API. Unfortunately, the code for this is not in Grizzly but got pushed in Havana, and so I wonder how we can support that in Pebbles. I know that for SUSE, we simply add the relevant patches to our OpenStack packages, but that will likely no

Re: [Crowbar] upstream chef-openstack cookbooks.

Le mardi 25 juin 2013, à 14:01 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit : > https://github.com/stackforge/cookbook-openstack-identity Btw, I encourage everyone to participate to the mailing list dedicated to the upstream cookbooks: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/opscode-chef-openstack Vincent -- Les

Re: [Crowbar] RC1

Hi Sébastien, Le samedi 22 juin 2013, à 14:06 +0200, Sébastien Braun a écrit : > First of all thanks for the great tool you're building, it's outstanding. > > I just need to report that the Horizon recipe create an apache > configuration with > > Alias /media > > While Horizon dashboard wo

Re: [Crowbar] Recent changes to proposal delete logic break the admin node sanity tests.

Hi Victor, Le vendredi 21 juin 2013, à 13:14 -0500, Victor Lowther a écrit : > Hi, Vincent: > > I was running through one of mt semi-regular smoketests of the Pebbles > codebase when I noticed that the admin node had transitioned into problem > state. A quick glance at /var/log/install.log showe

Re: [Crowbar] ceilometer

Hi, Le jeudi 20 juin 2013, à 21:59 -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > Team, > We have outstanding ceilometer barclamp that is gathering dust. > We need to decide if/when we want to merge it into Pebbles. > > By default, we will merge it in following usual review process. > Please, state

Re: [Crowbar] loadbalancer barclamp

Hi, Le jeudi 20 juin 2013, à 22:00 -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > Team, > We have outstanding loadbalancer barclamp that is gathering dust. > We need to decide if/when we want to merge it into Pebbles. > > By default, we will merge it in following usual review process. > Please, stat

Re: [Crowbar] cinder error on apply

Le mardi 18 juin 2013, à 17:53 -0500, wayne_al...@dell.com a écrit : > Subsequently succeeded. We are executing this too early in the recipe stream? > > > > Error executing action `run` on resource 'execute[cinder-ma

Re: [Crowbar] install vs. upgrade

Le lundi 17 juin 2013, à 16:22 -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > Vincent, > I apologize for delaying the merge of your fixed across the board for all BC > to install but it is not clear what was agreed to at the last week design > call. > We do not have minutes so it is hard to find out

Re: [Crowbar] nova dashboard broken in pebbles...

Le lundi 17 juin 2013, à 18:48 -0500, wayne_al...@dell.com a écrit : > Cannot access static data (js, css, etc.) I think one of the changes merged > Friday may have done it - there are changes to the server recipe there... > > Pull requests 71, 74 or 75, perhaps. I haven't had time to investigat

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

Le vendredi 14 juin 2013, à 08:55 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit : > > I'm not sure how we can deploy things out of order, when there is a real > > dependency: for instance, it's hard to deploy keystone before the > > database. So this means that this would only "work" for some cases, and > > break in

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

Le jeudi 13 juin 2013, à 13:08 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit : > On Jun 13, 2013 12:56 PM, "Vincent Untz" wrote: > > > > Le jeudi 13 juin 2013, à 12:22 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit : > > > Sigh. > > > > > > I see what you mean about out-of-order keys

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

> > > > > > Proposal policy question below.. > > > > Judd Maltin > > 1-917-882-1270 > > I have suffering to learn compassion once and once again. > > > > On Jun 13, 2013 12:56 PM, "Vincent Untz" wrote: > >> > >> Le jeu

[Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

Hi, Right now, both the glance and swift barclamps have the option of deploying glance/swift without keystone support. However, as we're targetting an OpenStack cloud, I don't think we really care about these cases. Is there any objection against me removing this? Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens

Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-quantum] Removed vlan option from quantum networking mode selector [1/1] (#45)

do you have more details about what's lacking? Vincent > Chris > > > -Original Message- > From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:48 AM > To: crowbar > Subject: Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-quantum] Removed vlan option from q

Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-quantum] Removed vlan option from quantum networking mode selector [1/1] (#45)

I don't think we should remove it in pebbles if it doesn't work (unless we also believe the option doesn't make sense in general). Do we have more details about the issue? Is there a bug opened about it? Vincent Le mercredi 12 juin 2013, à 12:45 -0700, cdearborn a écrit : > Merging to pebbles/ma

Re: [Crowbar] Differences between "Delete" and "Reset" actions?

Le lundi 10 juin 2013, à 17:44 +0100, Adam Spiers a écrit : > Vincent Untz (vu...@suse.com) wrote: > > Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 13:10 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > While investigating a bug, I wondered about the differences between the &g

Re: [Crowbar] multi-proposal in pebbles

Hi, Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 17:31 -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > Team, > Currently multi-proposal does not work in pebbles. Yet, all OpenStack > barclamps state that multiple proposals are supported. > I recommend that we turn that flag off (allow_multiple_proposals) for all > Open

Re: [Crowbar] Differences between "Delete" and "Reset" actions?

Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 13:10 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Hi, > > While investigating a bug, I wondered about the differences between the > "Delete" and "Reset" (which also seems to be called "Deallocate") > actions in Crowbar. > > The only

[Crowbar] "Rework how we allocate disks to barclamps" pull request review

Hi Victor, (sending this here, because you're not on irc anymore) FWIW, I'm not sure why, but github doesn't show me the updated patch in the pull request, so before things get merged, I guess we should figure this out. I looked directly at the commits in your branches instead. I think I'm fine

Re: [Crowbar] Database barclamp merges....

Le mercredi 05 juin 2013, à 09:56 +0200, Adam Spiers a écrit : > arkady_kanev...@dell.com (arkady_kanev...@dell.com) wrote: > > Thanks Wayne and Chris for staying late and finishing the merge. > > Great work guys! +1, it's a great step forward! Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

Re: [Crowbar] status and merge orchestration

Le lundi 03 juin 2013, à 15:55 -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > Vincent, you cannot have both database and MySQL barclamps at the same time. > All OS barclamps are dependent on MySQL. > And we need to do the whole change to database one in one swoop. I know, and I said I understand the

Re: [Crowbar] status and merge orchestration

Le lundi 03 juin 2013, à 15:16 -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > Here is the order I propose we follow. > > > 1. Dell RAID barclamp is added to pebble. > > 2. Hadoop release branch is cut from Pebbles > > 3. OS barclamps are all updated to use database one and my SQL

Re: [Crowbar] database barclamp conversion status...

Le samedi 01 juin 2013, à 16:58 -0500, wayne_al...@dell.com a écrit : > root@d08-00-27-77-de-9f:~# keystone service-list > +--+--+--++ > |id| name | type |description >

Re: [Crowbar] multi-proposal in pebbles

Le vendredi 31 mai 2013, à 15:16 -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > Adam, > There are many issues. > First, nobody really tried it for all barclamps. > We tried it with a few ones. And Mirantis tried it on a few ones. > There were a few patches filed for it. > > Main thing that we need to

Re: [Crowbar] SUSE - review cinder and glance pull requests?

: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Ralf Haferkamp > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 7:27 AM > To: crowbar > Subject: Re: [Crowbar] SUSE - review cinder and glance pull requests? > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:52:47PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Le mercredi 29 mai 2013, à 03:44 -0500, w

Re: [Crowbar] FW: Review Request

far as I understand. Vincent > > > - John T. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:19 AM > > To: crowbar > > Subject: Re: [Crowbar] FW: Review Request > > > > Just as

Re: [Crowbar] SUSE - review cinder and glance pull requests?

Le mercredi 29 mai 2013, à 15:52 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Le mercredi 29 mai 2013, à 03:44 -0500, wayne_al...@dell.com a écrit : > > Ralf, Vincent, could someone give a review to these pending pull requests? > > They look good to me, but I'll let Ralf double-check sinc

Re: [Crowbar] FW: Review Request

Just as a follow-up on this: I sent a pull request to improve the one that went in without a +1 from our side. Vincent Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 08:20 -0500, john_terps...@dell.com a écrit : > FYI > > From: Terpstra, John > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:20 AM > To: Vincent Untz

Re: [Crowbar] crowbar check-ins

Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 10:58 -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com a écrit : > Dear team, > Over the last few days pebbles code base become very unstable. > Two biggest issues right now are logging changes and 2 versions of mysql > cookbooks, one in mysql barclamp and one in database one. > > Victor f

Re: [Crowbar] Change in sledgehammer-common impacting more than Pebbles

e in sledgehammer-common impacting more than > Pebbles > > Victor Lowther (victor_lowt...@dell.com) wrote: > > > -----Original Message- > > > From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz > > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:57 AM > > > To: c

Re: [Crowbar] Change in sledgehammer-common impacting more than Pebbles

Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 07:03 -0500, Victor Lowther a écrit : > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I just realized that one of my commits that got merged will impact > > non-Pebbles branches, and might be an issue requiring cha

[Crowbar] Differences between "Delete" and "Reset" actions?

Hi, While investigating a bug, I wondered about the differences between the "Delete" and "Reset" (which also seems to be called "Deallocate") actions in Crowbar. The only doc I could really find is at https://github.com/crowbar/travis-ci-crowbar/blob/master/barclamps/crowbar/doc/userguide/using-c

[Crowbar] Change in sledgehammer-common impacting more than Pebbles

Hi, I just realized that one of my commits that got merged will impact non-Pebbles branches, and might be an issue requiring changes in these branches too. This is the following commit: https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/commit/29b97580c42bdfe1e0b548cff773811eaeea16d9 In short, this is changin

Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-database] Add database barclamp to pebbles to begin conversion from MySql barclamp. [1/1] (#6)

Le mercredi 29 mai 2013, à 09:53 -0500, wayne_al...@dell.com a écrit : > This is just the first iteration on the database barclamp, attempting to get > it in place so the other barclamps can be integrated with it. This activity > is the focus of our sprint. As far as I know, the only question a

Re: [Crowbar] SUSE - review cinder and glance pull requests?

Le mercredi 29 mai 2013, à 03:44 -0500, wayne_al...@dell.com a écrit : > Ralf, Vincent, could someone give a review to these pending pull requests? They look good to me, but I'll let Ralf double-check since I have nearly no experience with the database barclamp. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne s

Re: [Crowbar] crowbar-status and crowbar-failed in schema files...

on: 2" to crowbar.yml (like in the crowbar barclamp) might work, but I haven't tested. Vincent > -Original Message- > From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 12:20 AM > To: crowbar > Subject: Re: [Crowbar] crowbar-status and c

Re: [Crowbar] crowbar-status and crowbar-failed in schema files...

e why these are needed and why the validation fails. > It may be simple, I just haven't had time to look more Re: > > commit 335006a6a78fcb9c152f302a5d5934e6c659bb5b > Author: Vincent Untz > Date: Thu Aug 23 14:03:40 2012 +0200 > > Add crowbar-status and cr

[Crowbar] Version number for Pebbles

Hey, I'm still confused about the version number that should be used for Pebbles. I heard 1.5, 1.6 and 1.7 for it at different point in time :-) Could we settle on one for sure and add that to https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Roadmap ? FWIW, one simple reason we need to know about this: v

Re: [Crowbar] Convergence of PFS & AT&T OpenStack cookbooks

Hi Andi, Le jeudi 14 mars 2013, à 14:55 -0500, andi_a...@dell.com a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > If we want to be able to switch to OpenStack cookbooks from AT&T for 2.0, I > > think it makes sense to start looking at merging the PFS feature in these > > I agree that this is a big difference in

[Crowbar] Convergence of PFS & AT&T OpenStack cookbooks

Hi, If we want to be able to switch to OpenStack cookbooks from AT&T for 2.0, I think it makes sense to start looking at merging the PFS feature in these cookbooks, as it's probably one of the biggest difference we need to focus on. It wouldn't hurt to discuss this specifically (either on a call,

[Crowbar] Porting core cookbooks to attribute injection

Hi, First, thanks for the overview on attribute injection in yesterday's call. This was quite useful to better understand what this all means and why we are moving this way, as well as how things can look like (with the keystone cookbook example). Ideally, we'd have a good example of porting a co