gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074827254
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -476,62 +956,83 @@ static int optee_ioctl_invoke(FAR struct optee_priv_data
*priv,
arg->ret = TEE_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
arg->ret_o
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074827254
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -476,62 +956,83 @@ static int optee_ioctl_invoke(FAR struct optee_priv_data
*priv,
arg->ret = TEE_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
arg->ret_o
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074827254
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -476,62 +956,83 @@ static int optee_ioctl_invoke(FAR struct optee_priv_data
*priv,
arg->ret = TEE_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
arg->ret_o
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16194#discussion_r2074827578
##
sched/semaphore/sem_waitirq.c:
##
@@ -72,31 +72,55 @@ void nxsem_wait_irq(FAR struct tcb_s *wtcb, int errcode)
{
FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb = this_task();
FAR se
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074827254
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -476,62 +956,83 @@ static int optee_ioctl_invoke(FAR struct optee_priv_data
*priv,
arg->ret = TEE_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
arg->ret_o
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16194#discussion_r2074821911
##
sched/semaphore/sem_trywait.c:
##
@@ -63,8 +63,11 @@
int nxsem_trywait_slow(FAR sem_t *sem)
{
irqstate_t flags;
- int32_t semcount;
- int ret;
+ int ret = -
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074817879
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -348,8 +419,8 @@ static int optee_ioctl_open_session(FAR struct
optee_priv_data *priv,
msg->params + 2);
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074805787
##
include/nuttx/tee.h:
##
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ struct tee_ioctl_shm_register_fd_data
#define TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL 0x8000
+/* Macro to help
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074805787
##
include/nuttx/tee.h:
##
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ struct tee_ioctl_shm_register_fd_data
#define TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL 0x8000
+/* Macro to help
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16194#discussion_r2074810210
##
sched/semaphore/sem_destroy.c:
##
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
int nxsem_destroy(FAR sem_t *sem)
{
int32_t old;
+ bool mutex = NXSEM_IS_MUTEX(sem);
+ FAR atomic_t *cons
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074805787
##
include/nuttx/tee.h:
##
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ struct tee_ioctl_shm_register_fd_data
#define TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL 0x8000
+/* Macro to help
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074809921
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -145,10 +207,398 @@ static bool optee_safe_va_range(FAR void *va, size_t
size)
return false;
}
-#else
+#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_ADDR
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074805787
##
include/nuttx/tee.h:
##
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ struct tee_ioctl_shm_register_fd_data
#define TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL 0x8000
+/* Macro to help
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074805206
##
drivers/misc/optee.h:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/
+ * drivers/misc/optee.h
+ *
+ * SPD
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074804683
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -145,10 +207,398 @@ static bool optee_safe_va_range(FAR void *va, size_t
size)
return false;
}
-#else
+#else /* !CONFIG_AR
jlaitine commented on PR #16194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16194#issuecomment-2853411481
> It doesn't make sense to boost the thread which pass nxsem_wait on a
counting semaphore, since the priority boost is meaningful only for a
mutex(binary semaphore). That's why I sug
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074773932
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -145,10 +207,398 @@ static bool optee_safe_va_range(FAR void *va, size_t
size)
return false;
}
-#else
+#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_ADDR
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074799936
##
include/nuttx/tee.h:
##
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ struct tee_ioctl_shm_register_fd_data
#define TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL 0x8000
+/* Macro
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074799133
##
drivers/misc/optee.h:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/
+ * drivers/misc/optee.h
+ *
+ * SPD
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074762646
##
libs/libc/wqueue/work_queue.c:
##
@@ -87,17 +87,17 @@ static int work_qqueue(FAR struct usr_wqueue_s *wqueue,
/* Initialize the work structure */
- w
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16194#issuecomment-2853378798
> > @jlaitine after this patchset get merged, we can simplify the holder
logic for priority inheritance since:
> >
> > 1. Don't track the multiple holders since mutex always
shtirlic commented on PR #16306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16306#issuecomment-2853375204
@avgoor
```
static void core1_boot(void)
{
#if CONFIG_ARCH_INTERRUPTSTACK > 3
/* Initializes the stack pointer */
arm_initialize_stack();
#endif
arm_
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074781958
##
drivers/misc/optee.h:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/
+ * drivers/misc/optee.h
+ *
+ * SPDX-Licen
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074781958
##
drivers/misc/optee.h:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/
+ * drivers/misc/optee.h
+ *
+ * SPDX-Licen
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074777223
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -145,10 +207,398 @@ static bool optee_safe_va_range(FAR void *va, size_t
size)
return false;
}
-#else
+#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_ADDR
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074773932
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -145,10 +207,398 @@ static bool optee_safe_va_range(FAR void *va, size_t
size)
return false;
}
-#else
+#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_ADDR
xiaoxiang781216 closed pull request #16283: wqueue: improve the robustness of
the work
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
jlaitine commented on PR #16194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16194#issuecomment-2853322370
> @jlaitine after this patchset get merged, we can simplify the holder logic
for priority inheritance since:
>
> 1. Don't track the multiple holders since mutex always can have one
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074746657
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -125,52 +115,24 @@ static const struct file_operations g_optee_ops =
static int optee_open(FAR struct file *filep)
{
- FAR struct s
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2074743563
##
include/nuttx/tee.h:
##
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ struct tee_ioctl_shm_register_fd_data
#define TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL 0x8000
+/* Macro to help
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074681300
##
libs/libc/wqueue/work_cancel.c:
##
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int work_qcancel(FAR struct usr_wqueue_s *wqueue,
*/
curr = wqueue->q.head;
-
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074680567
##
sched/wqueue/kwork_thread.c:
##
@@ -110,6 +116,53 @@ struct lp_wqueue_s g_lpwork =
* Private Functions
**
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074680361
##
sched/wqueue/wqueue.h:
##
@@ -159,6 +148,65 @@ static inline_function FAR struct kwork_wqueue_s
*work_qid2wq(int qid)
}
}
+/
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074674647
##
sched/wqueue/kwork_cancel.c:
##
@@ -59,17 +59,37 @@ static int work_qcancel(FAR struct kwork_wqueue_s *wqueue,
bool sync,
*/
flags = spin_lock_irqsave(&w
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074673094
##
sched/wqueue/kwork_thread.c:
##
@@ -148,33 +193,54 @@ static int work_thread(int argc, FAR char *argv[])
kworker = (FAR struct kworker_s *)
((uintp
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074669532
##
sched/wqueue/wqueue.h:
##
@@ -159,6 +148,65 @@ static inline_function FAR struct kwork_wqueue_s
*work_qid2wq(int qid)
}
}
+/**
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16323#discussion_r2074659948
##
arch/avr/src/avr/Kconfig:
##
@@ -57,6 +57,26 @@ config AVR_BUILDROOT_TOOLCHAIN
endchoice # Toolchain
+config AVR_LINUXGCC_TOOLCHAIN_IS_GCC
+ bool
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074663527
##
sched/wqueue/kwork_cancel.c:
##
@@ -59,17 +59,37 @@ static int work_qcancel(FAR struct kwork_wqueue_s *wqueue,
bool sync,
*/
flags = spin_lock_irqs
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16323#issuecomment-2853129084
> @sumpfralle please add RCALL to codespell exception, it is failing:
>
> /home/runner/work/nuttx/nuttx/nuttx/arch/avr/src/avr/excptmacros.h:336:
RCALL ==> RECALL
>
>
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16309#discussion_r2073947475
##
include/nuttx/tee.h:
##
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ struct tee_ioctl_shm_register_fd_data
#define TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL 0x8000
+/* Macro
linguini1 commented on code in PR #16321:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16321#discussion_r2074649541
##
Documentation/platforms/arm64/zynq-mpsoc/boards/zcu111/index.rst:
##
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC ZCU111
=
+.. tags:: chi
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074646362
##
sched/wqueue/kwork_thread.c:
##
@@ -148,33 +193,54 @@ static int work_thread(int argc, FAR char *argv[])
kworker = (FAR struct kworker_s *)
((uintp
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074646468
##
sched/wqueue/kwork_queue.c:
##
@@ -141,65 +80,72 @@ int work_queue_period_wq(FAR struct kwork_wqueue_s *wqueue,
FAR void *arg, clock_t de
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074631788
##
sched/wqueue/kwork_thread.c:
##
@@ -148,33 +193,54 @@ static int work_thread(int argc, FAR char *argv[])
kworker = (FAR struct kworker_s *)
((uintp
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074631337
##
sched/wqueue/wqueue.h:
##
@@ -159,6 +148,65 @@ static inline_function FAR struct kwork_wqueue_s
*work_qid2wq(int qid)
}
}
+/**
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074628950
##
include/nuttx/wqueue.h:
##
@@ -249,19 +249,11 @@ typedef CODE void (*worker_t)(FAR void *arg);
struct work_s
{
- union
- {
-struct
-{
- struct l
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074630963
##
sched/wqueue/kwork_queue.c:
##
@@ -141,65 +80,72 @@ int work_queue_period_wq(FAR struct kwork_wqueue_s *wqueue,
FAR void *arg, clock_t de
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #16231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231#discussion_r2074628825
##
sched/wqueue/kwork_cancel.c:
##
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
#include
#include
-#include
+#include
Review Comment:
Done.
##
sched/wqueue/wqueue.h:
linguini1 commented on PR #16281:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16281#issuecomment-2852895106
> Thank you @linguini1 :-) I have ordered this Xiao RP2040 board so I can
help testing too :-)
You could probably re-use this example on another RP2040 board just using a
differe
acassis commented on PR #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16323#issuecomment-2852893321
@sumpfralle please add RCALL to codespell exception
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
nuttxpr commented on PR #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16323#issuecomment-2852887823
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements.
acassis opened a new pull request, #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16323
## Summary
These patches were created by KR to enable support to AVRDA and AVRDB. This
is early stage with only hello board profile example.
## Impact
Users will be able to test Nu
cederom commented on code in PR #16321:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16321#discussion_r2074478831
##
Documentation/platforms/arm/nrf91/boards/thingy91/index.rst:
##
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Nordic Thingy:91
=
+.. tags:: chip:nrf91, chip:nrf9160, chip:nrf5
cederom commented on PR #16281:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16281#issuecomment-2852851358
Thank you @linguini1 :-) I have ordered this Xiao RP2040 board so I can help
testing too :-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, plea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch asf-site
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx-website.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
new 047d79353 Publishing web: 16e1777
acassis commented on PR #16322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16322#issuecomment-2852840229
These are the right commits:
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
cederom commented on PR #16322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16322#issuecomment-2852840089
Ah allright, thank you @acassis !! :-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
cederom commented on PR #16322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16322#issuecomment-2852839271
Yeah, lets reopen this one and mark "draft" until resolved so I have
somewhere to work on :-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
acassis commented on PR #16322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16322#issuecomment-2852839261
I'm reviewing and testing the code that he submitted, you should have
aligned with me before submitting it! :-D
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
acassis commented on PR #16322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16322#issuecomment-2852832650
@cederom there are something wrong, the commit you sent are not related
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
cederom closed pull request #16322: arch/avr: fixes rfc2.
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16322
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
nuttxpr commented on PR #16322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16322#issuecomment-2852831163
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
__Fill In The Commit Message:__ This PR contains a Commit with
cederom opened a new pull request, #16322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16322
## Summary
Note: This is a proxy PR from kr@kerogit.eu, continues
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16268.
Here are the changes from previous version:
1. some formatting and
anchao commented on code in PR #16319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16319#discussion_r2074367178
##
libs/libc/stream/lib_blkoutstream.c:
##
@@ -153,15 +153,15 @@ static ssize_t blkoutstream_puts(FAR struct
lib_sostream_s *self,
if (offset > 0)
{
-
anchao commented on code in PR #16320:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16320#discussion_r2074362653
##
arch/risc-v/src/common/espressif/Bootloader.mk:
##
@@ -35,8 +35,14 @@ BOOTLOADER_CONFIG= $(BOOTLOADER_SRCDIR)/bootloader.conf
MCUBOOT_SRCDIR = $(BOOTLOADER
anchao commented on code in PR #16312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16312#discussion_r2074361455
##
tools/Unix.mk:
##
@@ -768,6 +768,7 @@ savedefconfig: apps_preconfig
$(Q) rm -f warning.tmp
$(Q) rm -f defconfig.tmp
$(Q) rm -f sortedconfig.tm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
acassis pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new e086ef2d02 boards/arm/stm32f7/nucleo-f767zi: enh
acassis merged PR #16307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16307
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apac
TimJTi commented on issue #16264:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16264#issuecomment-2852427171
> You are right, we are missing documentation regarding Python linting. We
do however have instructions on using `pre-commit`, it should automatically run
the Python linting tools:
[
cederom commented on issue #16271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16271#issuecomment-2852399425
> @keever50: I can confirm platformio
(https://github.com/earlephilhower/arduino-pico) is including a bootloader.
Might be a nice addition for NuttX to add it as well.
Hmm thi
keever50 commented on issue #16271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16271#issuecomment-2852289928
I can confirm platformio (https://github.com/earlephilhower/arduino-pico) is
including a bootloader.
Might be a nice addition for NuttX to add it as well.
--
This is an automat
cederom commented on code in PR #3065:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3065#discussion_r2074031679
##
examples/posix_stdio/posix_stdio.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/
+ * apps/examples/posix_st
linguini1 commented on issue #16271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16271#issuecomment-2852209273
After doing more research on this topic I haven't been able to find any
mention of automatic flashing of RP2040 chips. All sources I've found said that
the chip requires the "boots
nuttxpr commented on PR #16321:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16321#issuecomment-2852199679
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements. T
vrmay23 commented on PR #16307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16307#issuecomment-2852193055
@acassis it is done!
Thanks!
BR,
Vinicius
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
linguini1 opened a new pull request, #16321:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16321
## Summary
This PR introduces more chip tags to various different boards in the
documentation, as part of the initiative to add the tagging system to the NuttX
docs.
This PR adds tags
stbenn commented on PR #16293:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16293#issuecomment-2852151807
@lupyuen Any idea why Linux arm-13 might be failing on this build? I don't
see any error or warnings (outside of CMake warning) in the logs. The only
strange part of the logs is that after
abisop commented on issue #16269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16269#issuecomment-2852100158
> Ok so it is not the wifi defconfig by itself, right? Please send here your
current defconfig so I can replicate with the actual features >that are enabled
(`make savedefconfig`).
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2852038376
hint: updated PR with one more spelling fix (`MingGW`)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
fdcavalcanti commented on issue #16269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16269#issuecomment-2852032528
Ok so it is not the wifi defconfig by itself, right?
Please send here your current defconfig so I can replicate with the actual
features that are enabled (`make savedefconfig`
nuttxpr commented on PR #16320:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16320#issuecomment-2852025746
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
Yes, this PR meets the NuttX requirements. The summary
acassis commented on PR #16318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2852015092
Thank you @sumpfralle now I saw the point, the -c parameter already existed
in checkpatch.sh. The issue is: in the past it was optional, since there is no
codespell check in the CI.
tmedicci opened a new pull request, #16320:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16320
## Summary
* espressif: Add variable to override MCUboot version and URL
The version and the git repository of Espressif's MCUboot port can be
changed by setting the `MCUBOOT_VERSION` an
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2852005777
> @sumpfralle I looked again and didn't see it included inside checkpatch.sh
script.
>
> More info about the script:
https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/components/tools/index.
acassis commented on PR #16318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2851981753
> > I think now the checkpatch should include the code spelling test, [..]
>
> I think, this was done in #16302? Or do you mean something else?
@sumpfralle I looked again and
linguini1 commented on PR #16281:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16281#issuecomment-2851975135
@keever50 @cederom
I see that this change has already been merged, however I did take the time
to write a test case that I tested on the XIAO RP2040 board I have on hand:
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2851955035
> I think now the checkpatch should include the code spelling test, [..]
I think, this was done in #16302? Or do you mean something else?
--
This is an automated message from t
acassis commented on PR #16318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2851946384
@sumpfralle @xiaoxiang781216 I think now the checkpatch should include the
code spelling test, otherwise devs only will discover about the fault too late
(then it is using the CI) and we
acassis commented on PR #16307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16307#issuecomment-2851940203
@vrmay23 now there is a code spell support and it detected an issue here:
/home/runner/work/nuttx/nuttx/nuttx/boards/arm/stm32f7/nucleo-f767zi/src/nucleo-f767zi.h:307:
inialization
acassis commented on PR #16307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16307#issuecomment-2851935487
@vrmay23 the CI is not able to detect that none file was modified, to it
will redo everything
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
vrmay23 commented on PR #3065:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3065#issuecomment-2851705165
@cederom it's done!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
vrmay23 commented on PR #16307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16307#issuecomment-2851572910
@jerpelea it's done. But it seems now it have to be checked again,
everything. Is this?
BR,
Vinicius
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
tmedicci commented on issue #16193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16193#issuecomment-2851571164
> Hi, trying to get around the race conditions between signal dispatching
and delivery in smp in [#16301](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16301)
>
> Could you check, if t
abisop commented on issue #16269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16269#issuecomment-2851542947
Thanks @fdcavalcanti sir for responding
I don't think its a power issue
As far as i got to know, its some kind of memory and timing (maybe race
condition) issue...
Please
TimJTi commented on code in PR #3068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3068#discussion_r2073755822
##
boot/nxboot/loader/boot.c:
##
@@ -403,6 +440,42 @@ static int perform_update(struct nxboot_state *state, bool
check_only)
return OK;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_NXBOOT
TimJTi commented on code in PR #3068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3068#discussion_r2073755151
##
boot/nxboot/loader/boot.c:
##
@@ -403,6 +440,42 @@ static int perform_update(struct nxboot_state *state, bool
check_only)
return OK;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_NXBOOT
nuttxpr commented on PR #16319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16319#issuecomment-2851507216
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
No. This PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements.
sumpfralle commented on code in PR #16318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#discussion_r2073738401
##
.codespell-ignore-lines:
##
@@ -12,3 +12,10 @@ Linix 45ZWN24-40 2 0.5 Ohm0.400 mH 2.34A
24V
THN,
# define AES_ISR_URAT_WORRDACC (5 <<
avgoor commented on PR #16306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16306#issuecomment-2851495441
Hi @shtirlic, after enabling the FPU on RP2350 it now locks up during a
startup in SMP configurations.
Here are the only culprits I have at the moment:
```
[rp2350.dap.core1] c
sumpfralle opened a new pull request, #16319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16319
## Summary
[Codespell](https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell/) discovered a
few typos in variable or function names.
These misspelled words are used in strictly local scopes.
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
