On Tuesday 09 January 2007 04:53, Ralf Winkler wrote:
> First of all, let me wish you all a happy new year.
>
> We are using Bacula in the version 1.39.11.
>
> Yesterday we had to do a restore.
> Everything works fine and all backuped data could be restored.
> But during the restore, bacula had a
On Monday 08 January 2007 16:35, Amiche wrote:
> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the
status of
> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated.
Bacula changes the status only the next time it wants to use the volume.
> So I defined "Volume
On Monday 08 January 2007 16:01, Gavin Conway wrote:
> Richard Mortimer wrote:
> > FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier
> > today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727
> > I am not sure if these are built against stable or testing but you ma
First of all, let me wish you all a happy new year.
We are using Bacula in the version 1.39.11.
Yesterday we had to do a restore.
Everything works fine and all backuped data could be restored.
But during the restore, bacula had a strange behavior.
We do the backup to a file.
Bacula read the fil
On 9 Jan 2007 at 3:42, orlakwahr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have configured bacula according to
> http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_TLS_Communication.html
> backups are fine, but restores are failing with:
>
> RestoreFiles.2007-01-09_03.09.10 Fatal error: Authorization problem: Remote
> server
Hello,
I have configured bacula according to
http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_TLS_Communication.html
backups are fine, but restores are failing with:
RestoreFiles.2007-01-09_03.09.10 Fatal error: Authorization problem: Remote
server requires TLS.
RestoreFiles.2007-01-09_03.09.10 Error: Ba
All,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:11 +0100, Mario Ohnewald wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> i am trouble getting bacula with DVD as a backup media working.
>
> You said that you are doing it that way and that it works fine. :)
> What bacula Version are you using? What dvd+rw-tools version do you have?
>
On Monday 08 January 2007 13:56, Andreas Lüdtke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when a job finishes and an e-mail should be sent I get the following error
message:
>
> 08-Jan 13:28 srv-dir: ../../lib/message.c:472 Mail prog:
bsmtp: ../../tools/bsmtp.c:329
> Fatal connect error to smtp.mail.com: ERR=No error
>
Many thanks Felix :-)
On Monday 08 January 2007 23:01, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The updatedb
RPM is a
> noarch package (which is only not labeled
> as such due to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the
updatedb pack
On Mon, January 8, 2007 2:05 pm, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Michael Nelson schrieb:
>> I am nervous though. If 2.0 doesn't work out, will I have a way to get
>> back to what does work (1.38.11)? If I just make copies of all the
>> stuff
>> in /etc/bacula and /var/lib/mysql/bacula and /var/bacula wi
Michael Nelson schrieb:
> I am nervous though. If 2.0 doesn't work out, will I have a way to get
> back to what does work (1.38.11)? If I just make copies of all the stuff
> in /etc/bacula and /var/lib/mysql/bacula and /var/bacula will that be
> enough to let me get back to where I am now?
Inst
Hi,
On 1/8/2007 11:19 AM, Quanzhong Zhang wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Could you help me?
Let's see... I've never used the tray monitor, and I have not looked up
its manual, so I could be wrong, but...
> There is no any “backup-dir” message display from the “Bacula tray
> monitor” (excep
Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The updatedb
RPM is a
noarch package (which is only not labeled
as such due to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the updatedb
packages
released by Scott.
I had some problems with my UTMS connection and releaseforg
I am interested in trying 2.0. I am currently running 1.38.11
successfully on two different backup servers, but honestly it has been
quite a chore trying to keep the one with the Autochanger running.
I understand that it is necessary to convert the database format (mysql)
when moving from 1.38 to
Hello Everyone,
I'm new to Bacula and I'm having some trouble configuring an Autochanger
using the disk-changer script. I'm using Bacula version 1.38.11
installed from RPM on SuSE 10.1 (x86_64). I've gone through the "Brief
Tutorial" on the bacula.org site and everything went fine. Now I'm
trying
Hello,
Could you help me?
There is no any "backup-dir" message display from the "Bacula tray
monitor" (except the title line). But when I issued the "status dir"
command on console, the result is correct.
The messages of "backup-fd" and "backup-sd" from the "Bacula tray
monitor" is OK.
On Mon, January 8, 2007 11:59 am, Erich Prinz wrote:
> Problem solved.
>
> This is pretty embarrassing for me. The software that is going to be
> replaced was still running on the system. Once that (and Bacula)
> services were stopped, btape and mt run fine.
Heh... I had something similar happen.
Problem solved.
This is pretty embarrassing for me. The software that is going to be
replaced was still running on the system. Once that (and Bacula)
services were stopped, btape and mt run fine.
Erich
On Jan 8, 2007, at 1:30 AM, Andreas Lüdtke wrote:
>>> Tape block granularity is 1024 byte
I got it to start building with this instead of modifying the spec file:
rpmbuild -ba --define "build_centos4 1" --define "build_mysql 1" --define
"mysql4 1" bacula.spec
I guess you are not supposed to modify the spec, but jus' inspec' it?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
danger
Trying to build 2.0 for CentOS4, I "%define centos4 1" and do rpmbuild -ba
bacula.spec and it spits out:
# rpmbuild -ba bacula.spec
error: You must specify a platform. Please examine the spec file.
error: line 129: Unknown tag: exit 1
Same if I try "%define rhel4 1". It seems to be because neit
In the message dated: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:19:37 +0100,
The pithy ruminations from Kern Sibbald on
were:
=> On Monday 08 January 2007 14:22, Aaron Knister wrote:
=> > Thanks for the sarcasm. NOT. I come here for support, not to be
=> > ridiculed. And i'll have you know that the restore from th
On Monday 08 January 2007 14:22, Aaron Knister wrote:
> Thanks for the sarcasm. NOT. I come here for support, not to be
> ridiculed. And i'll have you know that the restore from that backup
> set did work.
Yes, I was sarcastic, but life is (at least I am) like that.
I certainly didn't mean
Alan Brown wrote:
> Note that the attribute spooling directory should be on a separate
> filesystem to the data spooling - if the data spool fills up, Bacula will
> flush it. If the attribute spool fills up the job aborts.
>
How big does the attribute spool have to be? Any guidelines?
Per.
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:02:55 +, Gavin Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected.
> Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade).
>
> The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon
> refused to s
On 8 Jan 2007 at 16:36, James Cort wrote:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> >> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the
> >> status of
> >> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated.
> >> So I def
Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the
>> status of
>> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated.
>> So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the n
In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status
> of
> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated.
> So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the next job
> using
> this volume
Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status of
the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated.
So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the next job using
this volume to mark it as Used,and not immediatly after the last job.
Richard Mortimer wrote:
> FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier
> today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727
> I am not sure if these are built against stable or testing but you may
> get better mileage out of them.
Many thanks, as mentione
Erich Prinz wrote:
> Very Interesting.
>
> The docs show /var/run/bacula as one of the directories that must me
> manually created prior to installing. What is interesting to me is you
> had a working system prior to an in-place upgrade. Still think it's a bug?
>
> Erich
I still see it as a
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, John Drescher wrote:
> I believe if you want to use both drives at the same time you have to
> use more than one pool because the second job will want to use the
> tape that is in the first drive and because it can't unload the tape
> from the first drive it will wait till the
> I have good the bacula-fd, bacula-sd and bacula-dir files, but I only
> have one pool every night. Need I more than one pool for have twho
> concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives?
>
I believe if you want to use both drives at the same time you have to
use more than one pool beca
I still have problems with the "tapeinfo" command. I always get the message "No
such file
or directory".
Can comeone please tell me how to use this command under windows? I'm using a
Quantum SCSI
DLT-V4 tape drive.
Thanks
Andreas
--
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 14:02 +, Gavin Conway wrote:
> Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected.
> Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade).
>
Did you previously use the Debian packages or did you compile yourself?
You should be aware that the Debia
Very Interesting.
The docs show /var/run/bacula as one of the directories that must
me manually created prior to installing. What is interesting to me is
you had a working system prior to an in-place upgrade. Still think
it's a bug?
Erich
On Jan 8, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Gavin Conway wrote
Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected.
Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade).
The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon
refused to start until I'd created a /var/run/bacula directory.
Either I've missed a step or this
Same problem here.
Seems to me the default install should include appropriate
credentials for device access.
btape and running a bacula job both fail with permission denied.
Any ideas?
E
On Jan 7, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
On 8 Jan 2007 at 8:22, Aaron Knister wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 07 January 2007 23:03, Aaron Knister wrote:
> >> I solved this problem myself. I'm not sure how elegant the solution
> >> is, however.
> >>
> >> Using myphpadmin I changed the "JobStatus"
Hi,
I've a little problem with the "Alert" command. I changed the default
configuration to
reflect my hardware. When I run a job I get the following messages:
08-Jan 13:28 srv-sd: Alert: cannot open SCSI device '*None*' - No such file or
directory
08-Jan 13:28 srv-sd: 3997 Bad alert command: ta
Thanks for the sarcasm. NOT. I come here for support, not to be
ridiculed. And i'll have you know that the restore from that backup
set did work.
On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2007 23:03, Aaron Knister wrote:
>> I solved this problem myself. I'm not s
It's been so long ago I set this up I had to go look...
Heartbeat Interval = 300
...
Try that out.
Erich
On Jan 7, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Charles Galpin wrote:
> Thanks Erich,
>
> On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Erich Prinz wrote:
>
>>
>> We can't expect Bacula to resolve our networking issues!
>
>
John Drescher escribió:
>> Is it possible to configure bacula to use both of these autochangers
>> with 2 concurrent backup jobs?
>>
> Yes it is. Have you set Maximum Concurrent Jobs in the director, the
> filedaemon and the storage daemon? Also are you using tapes from more
> than one pool?
>
> ba
Hi,
when a job finishes and an e-mail should be sent I get the following error
message:
08-Jan 13:28 srv-dir: ../../lib/message.c:472 Mail prog: bsmtp:
../../tools/bsmtp.c:329
Fatal connect error to smtp.mail.com: ERR=No error
08-Jan 13:28 srv-dir: Backup.2007-01-08_13.27.42 Error: ../../lib/me
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> In theory, a 600 GB tape with a 200 GB spool file would be filled in
> three chunks. As the sizes never add up that well, and the actual tape
> capacity is never that exact, you will find that it takes three or four
> despooling turns which doesn't sound t
Hello,
Please always copy the email list.
On Monday 08 January 2007 10:32, Chris Rodgers wrote:
> > It appears that you have a rather unique case, since many other users
> > including myself rely on Bacula continuing when a client cannot be
contacted.
>
> It wouldn't surprise me. I guess that
Hi,
On 1/8/2007 11:46 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
>
>>In theory, a 600 GB tape with a 200 GB spool file would be filled in
>>three chunks. As the sizes never add up that well, and the actual tape
>>capacity is never that exact, you will find that it takes th
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Silver Salonen wrote:
> To me it sounds very.. um.. important. I've had similar situations, but with
> 20-30 GB, so it hasn't been SO critical (only sufficiently as I do backups
> via WAN).
I've had it happen 700Gb into 1Tb backups.
There's a few good reasons to keep backup s
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> getting back OT... can bacula run multiple clients simultaneously?
Yes.
> and, so far ive not read that it cant be done, but one of my clients is
> a linux running on ppc...
Bacula-fd (the client) compiled for linux-ppc (ubuntu) works fine here.
-
On Sunday 07 January 2007 23:03, Aaron Knister wrote:
> I solved this problem myself. I'm not sure how elegant the solution
> is, however.
>
> Using myphpadmin I changed the "JobStatus" field in the respective
> jobid's mysql entry from "f" to "T". I then re-ran the job and it
> picked up mo
On Monday 08 January 2007 10:10, Chris Rodgers wrote:
> To my mind, the correct behaviour would be for the director to terminate
> the job after FDConnectTimeout has elapsed and then to inform the
> storage daemon that the job has been cancelled / had an error. At the
> moment, it l
To my mind, the correct behaviour would be for the director to terminate
the job after FDConnectTimeout has elapsed and then to inform the
storage daemon that the job has been cancelled / had an error. At the
moment, it looks like the director cancels the job but leaves the
stor
51 matches
Mail list logo
