On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:02:55 +0000, Gavin Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected. > Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade). > > The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon > refused to start until I'd created a /var/run/bacula directory. >
What's so bad about backports? I honestly don't know whether they are already available / it makes sense to have them. With Etch so close to release, you might as well try upgrading :-? Some people have already built backports in the past, or I could try to maintain them, given enough interest... can't promise a thing as of yet, though. > > Either I've missed a step or this is a bug with the make install process. > > Cheers, > Gavin > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
