Re: Echart licensing

The mission of the ASF is software for the public good. You will find the answer to your questions here: https://www.apache.org/foundation/faq Best, Dave > On Apr 10, 2025, at 4:43 AM, Manoj Korubilli > wrote: > > Hi Team, > > We are considering using Apache ECharts in our internal and clien

Re: Hunter website?

Please change “Otava®" to “Otava™” or plain “Otava” You can only use ® if a product is a registered trademark. Best, Dave > On Mar 22, 2025, at 10:26 PM, Alexander Sorokoumov > wrote: > > Hi team, > > https://otava.apache.org/ is live! Check it out and let me know what you > think. I am happ

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SAFplus into the Apache Incubator

A major concern is that the codebase is currently GPL-2.0 licensed. Converting all of the OpenClovis included code will be needed and some clarity if all of the contributors have allowed OpenClovis to modify the license for their contributions. Best, Dave > On Apr 4, 2025, at 10:47 AM, PJ Fann

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hamilton into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Apr 2, 2025, at 10:25 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Hamilton into the Apache Incubator. > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HamiltonProposal > > And the discussion: > https://lists.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Accept Texera into the Apache Incubator

ttps://incubator.apache.org/cookbook/ >>> >>> We would definitely appreciate more mentors if anyone in the IPMC has >>> the time to spare. >>> >>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 23:32, Dave Fisher wrote: >>>> >>>> You only have 2 ment

Re: [VOTE] Accept Texera into the Apache Incubator

You only have 2 mentors listed in the proposal. I think that a minimum of 3 are required. > On Apr 1, 2025, at 2:27 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > I will add my +1 binding (fanningpj IPMC) > > On 2025/03/31 15:18:12 Cezar Cristian Andrei wrote: >> My vote is: >> +1, bring Texera into the Incubator

Re: Path towards the first Apache release

> On Mar 30, 2025, at 3:35 PM, Alexander Sorokoumov > wrote: > > Hey folks, > > I think we are very close to cutting the first Apache release. Yet, there > are many small steps to do. Personally, I have been procrastinating on them > as I don't exactly know what to do. > > To get over this "

Re: Release documentation (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OzHera (incubating) 2.2.5-incubating released)

> On Mar 28, 2025, at 9:29 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 16:04, tison wrote: >> >> The related docs are: >> >> * (mainly) https://infra.apache.org/release-download-pages.html >> * https://infra.apache.org/release-publishing.html >> * https://infra.apache.org/release-distributio

Re: non-Pulsar content spam in Pulsar Slack's general channel

Hi Lari, I made you a Workplace Admin. Best, Dave > On Mar 19, 2025, at 4:26 AM, David Jensen wrote: > > I wonder if we have anyone who is the admin for the pulsar slack? They should > be able to remove the message and or kick the users? > > On 2025/03/17 13:37:15 Lari Hotari wrote: >> Hi al

Re: permission to access apache_pulsar crawler on Algolia Crawler console

HI Lari, This is broken due to Privacy policy on Apache project websites. This is a private email from another project. See this thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/cg6solb8bqmw0h8617zqofo0ogv6cqpd Best, Dave > On Mar 27, 2025, at 1:32 PM, Lari Hotari wrote: > > Hi, > > Could someone p

Re: Use of of "creator of Apache Foo"

Putting it into the maturity model may be “best practices”, but it gets treated as “policy” >> We could possibly add an extra item to the maturity model [3] along the >> lines of “TB50. The project and third parties do not refer to anyone as “the >> creator/founder of Apache Foo”. with a link t

Re: Use of of "creator of Apache Foo"

> On Mar 25, 2025, at 6:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 11:31 AM Paul King wrote: >> ...For me the wording is critical. If the wording is "original >> creator of the technology behind Apache Foo" or similar I have less >> concern, assuming it is true... > > I

Fwd: svn commit: r1924569 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/otava.xml

I updated the pooling status file. Best, Dave > Begin forwarded message: > > From: w...@apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1924569 - > /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/otava.xml > Date: March 24, 2025 at 8:26:10 PM PDT > To: c...@incubator.apache.org > Reply-To: gene...@incubator.apache

Re: [Discussion] ECharts From Mermaid Project

d by mermaid. > How about "echarts-mermaiddish" to imply it's kind like mermaid? > > Thanks > > *Ovilia* > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:54 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> >>> On Mar 20, 2025, at 2:22 AM, Ovilia wrote: >>> &

Re: 2025 Jump-start [WAS: Welcome new VP, Diversity and Inclusion]

> On Mar 23, 2025, at 4:38 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > > >> On Mar 20, 2025, at 07:09, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> >> On 3/19/25 23:01, Chris Lambertus wrote: On Mar 19, 2025, at 1:22 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 3/19/25 11:28, Ruth Suehle wrote: > Those of you who have read

Re: 2025 Jump-start [WAS: Welcome new VP, Diversity and Inclusion]

> On Mar 19, 2025, at 1:22 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 3/19/25 11:28, Ruth Suehle wrote: > > Those of you who have read my board report for today's meeting will have > > seen that after a lengthy time of low activity, I'm pleased to appoint > > Daniel Gruno to the role of VP, Diversity and

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

a.o, but that does not happen automatically. > Infra have to request for changes to be made; there may be a charge involved. If Pony Mail retires then would it be to infrastructure repositories? Justin - should there be a “Roll Call” for Pony Mail? Best, Dave > >> Best, >> t

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

> On Mar 20, 2025, at 12:44 AM, Xuanwo wrote: > > It looks like PonyMail has been discontinued. How about we retire PonyMail > and switch to more mature solutions like Mailman and HyperKitty? lists.apache.org is a provided service from a vendor with a contract from the ASF. This Pony Mail di

Re: [Discussion] ECharts From Mermaid Project

> On Mar 20, 2025, at 2:22 AM, Ovilia wrote: > > Hi, > > I've developed pie/line/bar chart options for now. > Check out to learn more at https://github.com/apache/echarts-from-mermaid. > > I would like to rename this repo into "mermaid-inspired-echarts" instead of > the current name because

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

structure, they don't > do ASF "release" IIUC but also not "retire" or archive. Sure we have infrastructure and now tooling archives. These also get archived if they are no longer relevant. Best, Dave > > Best, > tison. > > Dave Fisher 于2025年3月20日周四

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

Let’s focus on the original question. > On Mar 20, 2025, at 12:35 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > The Pony Mail project has been incubating since 2016 and lately has failed to > submit its reports. The PPMC is struggling to attract people and only has two > or three active people on it.

Re: SBOM tooling CVE handling

VEX files are what may be used to report vulnerabilities. It’s somewhat orthogonal to a release’s SBOM, Piotr, VP, ECMA and Arnout from Security are discussing this topic. ATR will make recommendations as Security policies evolve. Best, Dave > On Mar 19, 2025, at 1:27 PM, Dominik Psenner wrot

Re: SBOM tooling CVE handling

VEX files are what may be used to report vulnerabilities. It’s somewhat orthogonal to a release’s SBOM, Piotr, VP, ECMA and Arnout from Security are discussing this topic. ATR will make recommendations as Security policies evolve. Best, Dave > On Mar 19, 2025, at 1:27 PM, Dominik Psenner wrot

Re: Welcome new VP, Diversity and Inclusion

Welcome! > On Mar 19, 2025, at 11:05 AM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Congrats Daniel! > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:59 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > >> Welcome, Daniel! >> >>> On Mar 19, 2025, at 11:28, Ruth Suehle wrote: >>> >>> Those of you who have read my board report for today's meeting will ha

Re: Graduation?

While Community Growth has been minimal, it did happen. Given the mix of PPMC members involved I am +1 for graduation. > On Mar 19, 2025, at 10:54 AM, Julien Nioche wrote: > > +1 to becoming a TLP > > The project, albeit having a small number of committers and contributors, > is probably as ac

Re: AOO41X Test Builds

So, ultimately another reason to move to 4.2.0 releases. > On Mar 17, 2025, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > This is an issue with building the 4.1.x series, due to requirements for very > old versions of Xcode which lack the current signing tools. > >> On Mar 11, 20

Re: [PR] Rename Hunter to Otava and add LICENSE headers [otava]

> On Mar 16, 2025, at 9:02 AM, henrikingo (via GitHub) wrote: > > > henrikingo commented on PR #37: > URL: https://github.com/apache/otava/pull/37#issuecomment-2727517038 > > Wow,thanks Sean. Cool that you also changed the name. This is a big step in > completing the transition to ASF. >

Re: Where to document the secretary workbench

Hi Craig, Since "Secretary’s Workbench” is work that is intended for a Tooling Initiative. (Not sure when yet.) Perhaps a free-form description of the various Secretarial tasks that Whimsy helps the Secretary team perform other than related to the Board Meeting. Any method like a markdown, con

Rename Should Be Complete

Hi - Please check that all the renaming is complete: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26531 Best, Dave

Re: Adding me as Assistant Secretary instead of Director

> On Mar 12, 2025, at 9:15 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 00:22, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> Here is the relevant part of the board agenda template: >> >>Executive Officers (expected to be) Present: >> >><%= ASF::Committee.officer('treasurer').public_name %> >>

Re: Clarification on the -1 policy for code changes

Hi, > On Mar 11, 2025, at 4:23 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Looking at the first propopal, I was surprised to discover > https://www.kie.org/ - having a domain name like this is not in line with ASF > trademark policy, nor is having a domain name like https://kogito.kie.org/. > There

Re: [DISCUSS] running a trial where podlings need to have their names reviewed before they join

> On Mar 6, 2025, at 9:20 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 14:53, PJ Fanning wrote: > >> Seems best to allow the discussion thread to proceed and if things seem >> ok, then start the name approval step. The vote only happens after the name >> is approved by Brand Manageme

Re: AOO41X Test Builds

Is this something that might be fixed with proper signing? If so please describe the procedure. > On Mar 11, 2025, at 7:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Yes, I think that's a new issue w/ the latest versions of Sequoia on the Mac > (starting with 15.3.x) > >> On Mar 11, 2025, at 10:03 AM, Matt

Testing rename of mailing lists

Checking on the INFRA ticket.

Re: svn commit: r1924250 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

The enddate and resolution need to be added as well. Please see the numerous examples. > On Mar 9, 2025, at 6:37 AM, ror...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: roryqi > Date: Sun Mar 9 13:37:31 2025 > New Revision: 1924250 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1924250&view=rev > Log: > Change Un

Re: svn commit: r1924250 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

Nevermind, I see that this has already been corrected. > On Mar 9, 2025, at 11:36 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > The enddate and resolution need to be added as well. Please see the numerous > examples. > >> On Mar 9, 2025, at 6:37 AM, ror...@apache.org wrote: >> >

Pre-commit failures

Hi - I enabled CI checks on oooforum’s https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/328 And they failed for reasons not having to do with the PR and for reasons that are opaque. At line 62728: Fixing main/framework/inc/macros/debug/registration.hxx fix utf-8 byte order marker

Re: [DISCUSS] running a trial where podlings need to have their names reviewed before they join

visually >> indicate the poddling’s progress through the process and highlight any >> challenges they encounter in specific phases. >> >> Best, >> Kranti >> >>> On Mar 6, 2025, at 10:08 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>>  >>> >

Re: [NOTE] Delete the Python Client 3.6.0 wheels from PyPI

This looks like a limit we will need to handle in some way. I wonder if Jarek has any experience. Best, Dave > On Mar 5, 2025, at 6:04 PM, Yunze Xu wrote: > > I created a project size limit request on PyPI support: > https://github.com/pypi/support/issues/5825 > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Wed,

Re: [Issue 128609] New: Update internal Boost to version 1.64

Adding dev@ for exposure. Thanks Pedro. > On Mar 3, 2025, at 10:59 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128609 > > Issue ID: 128609 >Issue Type: DEFECT > Summary: Update internal Boost to version 1.64 > Product: Genera

Re: [MENTORS] March report timeline - reports due March 2025

> On Mar 3, 2025, at 3:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI Dave, > > This email was generated by a script. I assume that some data the script > relies on has not been updated. And that is strange because podlings.xml is updated and the website is correct. Perhaps one of the lists used was g

Re: [MENTORS] March report timeline - reports due March 2025

> On Mar 2, 2025, at 7:22 PM, jmcl...@apache.org wrote: > > Dates for next board report: > Wed March 05 - Podling reports due by end of day > Sun March 09 - Shepherd reviews due by end of day > Sun March 09 - Summary due by end of day > Tue March 11 - Mentor signoff due by end of day > Wed March

Re: Forum and wiki outage

2/2025 10:23, casalva a écrit : >> By now there is more time that doesn't work than time that does work >> martedì 26 novembre 2024 18:02, Dave Fisher ha scritto: >>> I think that the fpm configuration needs some tweaks. It will take log >>> analysis and maybe wat

Re: Forum and wiki outage

can ignore any complaints. They are > wildly out of line. > Francis > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 1:34 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Both the Forums and the Wiki are being actively attacked. >> >> Today’s attack is different and now also includes the Wiki. >> &

Re: devtools repo

And now it should be. > On Feb 27, 2025, at 6:40 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > No it’s not. > > Best, > Dave > >> On Feb 27, 2025, at 6:22 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> Is the SVN repo now

Re: devtools repo

Hi Matthias, No it’s not. Best, Dave > On Feb 27, 2025, at 6:22 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Is the SVN repo now read-only? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 26.02.25 um 02:26 schrieb Dave Fisher: >> Hi - >> >> Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need to update the documents for PIP and LTS releases?

From the peanut gallery. > On Feb 26, 2025, at 12:56 AM, Lari Hotari wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 09:47, Yunze Xu > wrote: >> >> Creating a PIP could emphasize that new configs are added and explain >> why these configs are introduced. While with a regular PR, espe

Re: devtools repo

://github.com/apache/openoffice-devtools.git git branch -M main Enjoy! Best, Dave > On Feb 15, 2025, at 12:08 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Am 15.02.25 um 20:52 schrieb Dave Fisher: >> Hi - >> >> I have not got to it yet. I do see updates occu

Re: Limited Scope on Pivot Table

Hi - For questions about Apache POI you should send an email to d...@poi.apache.org or u...@poi.apache.org. Best, Dave > On Feb 24, 2025, at 11:21 AM, HARI KRISHNA > wrote: > > Hi, > We're using Apache poi for generating Excel sheets in Java. For the excel > workbooks, It's comparatively the

Re: Forum and wiki outage

ents. > This could reduce traffic. > > - Mail original - >> De: "Rory O'Farrell" >> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Envoyé: Dimanche 23 Février 2025 10:47:14 >> Objet: Re: Forum and wiki outage >> >> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:35:00

Re: Forum and wiki outage

22, 2025, at 1:23 AM, casalva wrote: > > By now there is more time that doesn't work than time that does work > > > martedì 26 novembre 2024 18:02, Dave Fisher ha scritto: > >> I think that the fpm configuration needs some tweaks. It will take log >> analysi

Re: Forum slow again

Hi Rory, I’m juggling and doing restarts, but it’s looking like I’ll need to do cleanup in mySQL. That is now the bottleneck. Best, Dave > On Feb 20, 2025, at 1:58 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > I'm not nagging, as I know you are dealing with the problem, if it is > identified, merely repo

Re: Request: simpler asf.yaml notifications from GitHub

> On Feb 20, 2025, at 4:18 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Given the velocity of work (yay!) and that everything is going to dev@ at the > moment, it's difficult to read the list, or to see the rare human discussions. > > It would be nice, when the team's ready, to see: > > - A separate commit

Re: Forum slow again

I’ve been trying to put a rate limiter in place. Clearly it’s not working properly yet. What type of request were you limited on? Best, Dave > On Feb 19, 2025, at 6:18 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 08:08:53 +0100 (CET) > Bidouille wrote: > >> Again once >> But I got this

Re: Forum slow again

> On Feb 15, 2025, at 12:36 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 12:26:09 -0800 > Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi Rory, >> >> It looks like there are robots actively scanning our Forum and Wiki >> websites. I’m going to discuss count

Re: Forum slow again

>> >> Saturday morning (20250215 09:00 UTC) still very slow - 2 - 3 mins response >> time. >> >> Rory > > Back now: quick response at 18:40 UTC > > Rory > >> >> >> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:38:06 -0800 >> Dave Fisher wrote:

Re: devtools repo

Hi - I have not got to it yet. I do see updates occurring including just today. Best, Dave > On Feb 15, 2025, at 4:47 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > So I assume this is canceled? > > Matthias > > Am 14.12.24 um 09:36 schrieb Marcus: >> Am 14.12.24 um 00:4

Re: Forum slow again

I had bounced it 45 minutes ago. I’ve bounced it again. > On Feb 14, 2025, at 10:33 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > Forum has gone slow again - response time currently 2min 15 sec > > -- > Rory O'Farrell > > - > To unsubscr

Re: Forum and wiki outage

I’ve restarted the two web services. > On Feb 13, 2025, at 2:56 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 07:59:51 +0100 (CET) > Bidouille wrote: > >> News: responding but very slow > > Might a (temporary) fix be to schedule a chron job reboot every day/week, at > some valley time in

Re: Update 2025

> On Feb 10, 2025, at 6:40 PM, Jeffrey Svansson wrote: > > Good evening I was just wondering when will OpenOffice 4.1.15 be updated. While I cannot tell you exactly when OpenOffice 4.1.16 is likely in two or three months. Best, Dave > > Thanks Jeffrey! --

Re: Podling Hunter Report Reminder - February 2025

Hi - I added the mentor sign off section and signed off. Best, Dave > On Feb 6, 2025, at 2:48 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote: > > Nice. It looks good actually, when written down :-) > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 12:07 AM Alexander Sorokoumov < > aleksandr.sorokou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here is the d

Re: Incubator SVN Clutch Analysis Part-1 CI Failure since 2024-12-01

ache%20HoraeDB%20for%20High-Cardinality%20Metrics%20at%20AntGroup.pdf > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 10:14, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> It looks like it is choking on bad data. >> >> Begin Clutch Analysis >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/tmp/incuba

Re: Incubator SVN Clutch Analysis Part-1 CI Failure since 2024-12-01

It looks like it is choking on bad data. Begin Clutch Analysis Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/incubator-site-content/clutch2.py", line 766, in dtm1 = datetime.datetime.strptime(" ".join(listing[-5:-1]),"%b %d %Y") File "/usr/lib/python3.10/_strptime.py", line 568, in _strpt

Re: Old Incubating Batchee Website & Google Analytics

> On Feb 4, 2025, at 5:02 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:39, sebb wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:10, Niall Pemberton >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Incubator Team! >>> >>> Batchee graduated from the Incubator in 2019 to become a sub-project of >>> Geronimo and batchee

Re: Issue tracking

Hi - JIRA is hard to manage because the PPMC has to respond to user signup requests. GH issues are easier for community building. Best, Dave > On Feb 4, 2025, at 1:58 PM, Alexander Sorokoumov > wrote: > > Hi, > > I think we should decide on the tool we are going to use for issue > tracking.

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

Hi - > On Feb 3, 2025, at 7:04 PM, tison wrote: > > I'm considering reuse the apache/incubator repo and migrate the > scripts [1] under tools [2]. > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/ > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator/tree/master/tools If you do this then be

Re: February 2025 reporting

> On Feb 3, 2025, at 4:46 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for doing that PJ, I’ve updated the formatting and corrected the > podling list that need to report this month and sent out the notification > emails. > > You can access the step needed by running “report_runbook.py”. T

Re: https://echarts.apache.org/ Site down

Hi PMC, ASF Infra has begun enforcing policy which disallows certain domains. This includes Baidu’s tracking service. The ASF does provide an alternative. Best, Dave > On Feb 3, 2025, at 11:10 AM, Jorge Solano > wrote: > > Hello , just want to report that https://echarts.apache.org/ is not l

Re: Trademarks did not approve of Apache Hunter

>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2024, 20.31 , wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Henrik! >>> >>>> On Dec 28, 2024, at 9:22 AM, Henrik Ingo wrote: >>>> >>>>  >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PODLINGNAMESEARCH/issues/PODLINGNA

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

> On Feb 3, 2025, at 5:29 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > I think there is probably a requirement to store the reports in ASF > svn but the idea of automating some of the generation tasks is > probably a good item to discuss. > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 14:16, Xuanwo wrote: >> >> Hey, everyone >>

Re: February 2025 reporting

xt to svn. >>>>> I'm not sure why some podlings ended up with no shepherd assignments. >>>>> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/February2025 >>>>> >>>>> These are the podlings that need to report

Re: [VOTE] Accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) wave > On Jan 31, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Iggy+Proposal > And the discussion: > https://lists.apache.or

Re: [DISCUSS] Iggy Proposal

This is a very interesting proposal there are a number of clients for the rust based service. The following repositories are listed. https://github.com/apache/iggy https://github.com/apache/iggy-docs http

Re: podling security issues

> On Jan 24, 2025, at 1:44 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > The ASF generally mandates a min of 3 days for votes on release > candidates. This can be significantly shortened if there is a security > issue that needs a quick release. > With Podlings, they typically require 2 rounds of voting (PPMC and

Re: [PR] Add basic EditorConfig file [openoffice]

Hi - > On Jan 24, 2025, at 12:05 PM, ardovm (via GitHub) wrote: > > > ardovm commented on PR #256: > URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/256#issuecomment-2613292891 > >> Wiki is often outdated. > > ...but I liked it that way... ;-) > > In fact, I thought that that wiki page wa

Re: Forum website responding slowly

I’ll be watching for degradation. Best, Dave > On Jan 22, 2025, at 11:58 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > I’ve been working today with ASF Infra on the configuration. > >> On Jan 22, 2025, at 7:40 AM, Bidouille wrote: >> >> Since early afternoon, slowness is back >>

Re: Forum website responding slowly

4 Janvier 2025 01:29:45 >> Objet: Re: Forum website responding slowly >> >> Unfortunately it seems the problem is back. >> >> Dave Fisher wrote: >>> I’ve restarted the web server and php services. >>> >>>> On Jan 12, 2025, at 11:26 P

[jira] [Closed] (WHIMSY-424) Mail Moderation Helper Problems

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed WHIMSY-424. -- Resolution: Invalid I made a basic error with the list name. > Mail Moderation Helper Probl

[jira] [Created] (WHIMSY-424) Mail Moderation Helper Problems

Dave Fisher created WHIMSY-424: -- Summary: Mail Moderation Helper Problems Key: WHIMSY-424 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-424 Project: Whimsy Issue Type: Bug

Re: Where do we go from here? WAS: Turning off public access to the regression corpora?

I think the question about (c) might best be directed to the VP, Privacy. It feels similar to email exposure of PII on mailing lists. Everything that was crawled was publicly available at one time or another. I could be wrong, but Privacy is knows GPDR while LEGAL knows the AL2, etc. > On Jan 1

Re: Forum website responding slowly

I’ve restarted the web server and php services. > On Jan 12, 2025, at 11:26 PM, David wrote: > > For the last couple of days the site is mostly very slow serving pages. Could > somebody have a look please? > > - > To unsubscri

Re: Forums and Wiki very slow

Hi - Restarted services. I’ve responded to the thread. Best, Dave > On Jan 12, 2025, at 11:34 PM, Bidouille wrote: > > Hello, > > Very slow connections since this morning. > https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=112336 > > -

Re: [PR] Upstreaming 2024 Nyrkiö patches [hunter]

Projects can choose to operate either by Review Then Commit (RTC) or Commit Then Review (CTR). You’ve satisfied either method. Best, Dave > On Jan 10, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote: > > But thanks. I'm proud to be on the committers and PPMC now - confirming > that it came through. > >

Re: [PR] Upstreaming 2024 Nyrkiö patches [hunter]

Henrik, I’ve done my mentor duty and added you to the roster. Allow an hour or so for updates and we will see if additional setup is needed. Best, Dave > On Jan 10, 2025, at 11:24 AM, henrikingo (via GitHub) wrote: > > > henrikingo commented on PR #27: > URL: https://github.com/apache/hunter

Re: [PR] Upstreaming 2024 Nyrkiö patches [hunter]

Henrik, I’ve done my mentor duty and added you to the roster. Allow an hour or so for updates and we will see if additional setup is needed. Best, Dave > On Jan 10, 2025, at 11:24 AM, henrikingo (via GitHub) wrote: > > > henrikingo commented on PR #27: > URL: https://github.com/apache/hunter

Re: convergence issues

ed, test. Best, Dave > On Jan 8, 2025, at 12:19 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > The logs look like they come from Maven Enforcer and are based on the > poms published to Maven Central. > > https://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-rules/dependencyConvergence.html > > On W

Re: convergence issues

> On Jan 8, 2025, at 11:13 AM, Tim Allison wrote: > > Thank you, all. I'm sorry for the noise. > > As you all point out, these are not a POI or even XMLBeans issue, and > provided should be, ahem, provided. > > We added convergence checks in Tika after an irate downstream user > complained.

Re: Request to access OpenOffice GitHub project

Hi Thokala, See https://openoffice.apache.org/source.html and https://github.com/apache/openoffice#readme Contribute PRs from your own fork of https://github.com/apache/openoffice/ - we are currently working on both `trunk` and `AOO42X` branches. If you

Re: Request to access OpenOffice GitHub project

Hi Thokala, Welcome to the project. Please make a fork of https://github.com/apache/openoffice/. If you can please run Coverity scans on your fork. It has been sometime since we ran scans and someone from the PMC will need to help with any maintenance we might need to do on that service. (If

Re: Seeking a Champion for Hamilton and/or Burr to apply for the Apache Incubator Program

> On Jan 3, 2025, at 2:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> 2. Question, does the whole repository need the same license? e.g. >> including documentation and examples? > > It would be preferable to re-license as many files as possible to the Apache > license, but ASF projects can includ

Re: Release metadata from `reporter.apache.org`

> On Dec 30, 2024, at 12:31 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 12/30/24 09:09, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: >> Hi all, >> Do you know where the release metadata we supply in: >> https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html >> >> is stored? > > https://proje

Re: The way to 4.2.0

> On Dec 29, 2024, at 5:17 PM, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: > >> - Another "regression" (Bugzilla seems to be down?) which is Windows-only, >> and has a known but ugly workaround - we leak the library handle like we >> did before (and still do on 4.1.x), instead of releasing it properly. > This o

Re: Regarding OpenOffice the Moribund.

to continue to exist, help support Open Office. Not exactly the reverse, but, yes, support OpenOffice in an inclusive manner. Best, Dave > > -- > Pagarbiai / Sincerely, > 📧 Aivaras Stepukonis <mailto:astepuko...@gmail.com> > -

Re: Regarding OpenOffice the Moribund.

> On Dec 28, 2024, at 3:32 PM, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: > > “Guerrilla marketing,” such as badmouthing Open Office and replacing > references to it with references to Libre Office in Wikipedia and elsewhere, > has been the norm for a long time now. A number of LO partizans use even > https

Re: The way to 4.2.0

> On Dec 29, 2024, at 2:49 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > Am 29.12.24 um 11:01 schrieb Peter kovacs: >> Hi all. >> >> So let's discuss blockers of 4.2.0. >> >> I am only aware of translations 4.2.0 as a real blocker. > We still have other blocker to fix, but yes, translatio

Re: Trademarks did not approve of Apache Hunter

gt;>>>> My apologies Mick, when compiling this list I realized your email >>>>>> actually >>>>>>> contained a suggestion too. Don't know how I missed it originally >> as >>>> it >>>>>> is >>>>>

Re: Trademarks did not approve of Apache Hunter

Generally at the ASF we prefer to find consensus rather than voting. Is there a consensus on Gunther vs. Tapio (or something else)? Best, Dave > On Dec 16, 2024, at 3:54 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote: > > Should we start the voting then? > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, 20.17 Alexander Sorokoumov, < > aleksa

Re: devtools repo

> On Dec 13, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Dave, Jim, All, > > Am 13.12.24 um 16:58 schrieb Dave Fisher: >> >>> On Dec 13, 2024, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Dec 13,

Re: devtools repo

> On Dec 13, 2024, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Dec 13, 2024, at 12:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 12, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Dec

Re: devtools repo

> On Dec 12, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Dec 12, 2024, at 1:04 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Agreed. Should we call the git version openoffice-devtools.git? Or do we >> move these to a devtools directory in openoffice.git? >&g

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >