Re: Where do we go from here? WAS: Turning off public access to the regression corpora?

I think the question about (c) might best be directed to the VP, Privacy. It feels similar to email exposure of PII on mailing lists. Everything that was crawled was publicly available at one time or another. I could be wrong, but Privacy is knows GPDR while LEGAL knows the AL2, etc. > On Jan 1

Re: Forum website responding slowly

I’ve restarted the web server and php services. > On Jan 12, 2025, at 11:26 PM, David wrote: > > For the last couple of days the site is mostly very slow serving pages. Could > somebody have a look please? > > - > To unsubscri

Re: Forums and Wiki very slow

Hi - Restarted services. I’ve responded to the thread. Best, Dave > On Jan 12, 2025, at 11:34 PM, Bidouille wrote: > > Hello, > > Very slow connections since this morning. > https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=112336 > > -

Re: [PR] Upstreaming 2024 Nyrkiö patches [hunter]

Projects can choose to operate either by Review Then Commit (RTC) or Commit Then Review (CTR). You’ve satisfied either method. Best, Dave > On Jan 10, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote: > > But thanks. I'm proud to be on the committers and PPMC now - confirming > that it came through. > >

Re: [PR] Upstreaming 2024 Nyrkiö patches [hunter]

Henrik, I’ve done my mentor duty and added you to the roster. Allow an hour or so for updates and we will see if additional setup is needed. Best, Dave > On Jan 10, 2025, at 11:24 AM, henrikingo (via GitHub) wrote: > > > henrikingo commented on PR #27: > URL: https://github.com/apache/hunter

Re: [PR] Upstreaming 2024 Nyrkiö patches [hunter]

Henrik, I’ve done my mentor duty and added you to the roster. Allow an hour or so for updates and we will see if additional setup is needed. Best, Dave > On Jan 10, 2025, at 11:24 AM, henrikingo (via GitHub) wrote: > > > henrikingo commented on PR #27: > URL: https://github.com/apache/hunter

Re: convergence issues

ed, test. Best, Dave > On Jan 8, 2025, at 12:19 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > The logs look like they come from Maven Enforcer and are based on the > poms published to Maven Central. > > https://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-rules/dependencyConvergence.html > > On W

Re: convergence issues

> On Jan 8, 2025, at 11:13 AM, Tim Allison wrote: > > Thank you, all. I'm sorry for the noise. > > As you all point out, these are not a POI or even XMLBeans issue, and > provided should be, ahem, provided. > > We added convergence checks in Tika after an irate downstream user > complained.

Re: Request to access OpenOffice GitHub project

Hi Thokala, See https://openoffice.apache.org/source.html and https://github.com/apache/openoffice#readme Contribute PRs from your own fork of https://github.com/apache/openoffice/ - we are currently working on both `trunk` and `AOO42X` branches. If you

Re: Request to access OpenOffice GitHub project

Hi Thokala, Welcome to the project. Please make a fork of https://github.com/apache/openoffice/. If you can please run Coverity scans on your fork. It has been sometime since we ran scans and someone from the PMC will need to help with any maintenance we might need to do on that service. (If

Re: Seeking a Champion for Hamilton and/or Burr to apply for the Apache Incubator Program

> On Jan 3, 2025, at 2:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> 2. Question, does the whole repository need the same license? e.g. >> including documentation and examples? > > It would be preferable to re-license as many files as possible to the Apache > license, but ASF projects can includ

Re: Release metadata from `reporter.apache.org`

> On Dec 30, 2024, at 12:31 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 12/30/24 09:09, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: >> Hi all, >> Do you know where the release metadata we supply in: >> https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html >> >> is stored? > > https://proje

Re: The way to 4.2.0

> On Dec 29, 2024, at 5:17 PM, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: > >> - Another "regression" (Bugzilla seems to be down?) which is Windows-only, >> and has a known but ugly workaround - we leak the library handle like we >> did before (and still do on 4.1.x), instead of releasing it properly. > This o

Re: Regarding OpenOffice the Moribund.

to continue to exist, help support Open Office. Not exactly the reverse, but, yes, support OpenOffice in an inclusive manner. Best, Dave > > -- > Pagarbiai / Sincerely, > 📧 Aivaras Stepukonis <mailto:astepuko...@gmail.com> > -

Re: Regarding OpenOffice the Moribund.

> On Dec 28, 2024, at 3:32 PM, Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: > > “Guerrilla marketing,” such as badmouthing Open Office and replacing > references to it with references to Libre Office in Wikipedia and elsewhere, > has been the norm for a long time now. A number of LO partizans use even > https

Re: The way to 4.2.0

> On Dec 29, 2024, at 2:49 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > Am 29.12.24 um 11:01 schrieb Peter kovacs: >> Hi all. >> >> So let's discuss blockers of 4.2.0. >> >> I am only aware of translations 4.2.0 as a real blocker. > We still have other blocker to fix, but yes, translatio

Re: Trademarks did not approve of Apache Hunter

gt;>>>> My apologies Mick, when compiling this list I realized your email >>>>>> actually >>>>>>> contained a suggestion too. Don't know how I missed it originally >> as >>>> it >>>>>> is >>>>>

Re: Trademarks did not approve of Apache Hunter

Generally at the ASF we prefer to find consensus rather than voting. Is there a consensus on Gunther vs. Tapio (or something else)? Best, Dave > On Dec 16, 2024, at 3:54 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote: > > Should we start the voting then? > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, 20.17 Alexander Sorokoumov, < > aleksa

Re: devtools repo

> On Dec 13, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Dave, Jim, All, > > Am 13.12.24 um 16:58 schrieb Dave Fisher: >> >>> On Dec 13, 2024, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Dec 13,

Re: devtools repo

> On Dec 13, 2024, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Dec 13, 2024, at 12:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 12, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Dec

Re: devtools repo

> On Dec 12, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Dec 12, 2024, at 1:04 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Agreed. Should we call the git version openoffice-devtools.git? Or do we >> move these to a devtools directory in openoffice.git? >&g

Re: devtools repo

Agreed. Should we call the git version openoffice-devtools.git? Or do we move these to a devtools directory in openoffice.git? We can then archive the directories that are no longer relevant > On Dec 12, 2024, at 2:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The `devtools` repo is still hosted under svn..

Re: Trademarks did not approve of Apache Hunter

m> wrote: >> >>> This is a little upsetting. What do you think about using the rest of the >>> week to propose and discuss name suggestions in this thread, then starting >>> a vote next Monday? >>> >>> Naturally, when suggesting a name we s

Re: Welcome

> On Dec 11, 2024, at 8:04 AM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > > Can we have a Feature Creep tool that aggregates all the wild ideas people > come up with? > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024, 11:51 a.m. Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Welcome to the public Tooling mailing list

Welcome

Welcome to the public Tooling mailing list fr development discussions. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tooling.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tooling.apache.org

Re: Trademarks did not approve of Apache Hunter

The rationale was sent on private mailing lists so I forwarded it to private@hunter > On Dec 10, 2024, at 2:13 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > I'm still looking/waiting for the rationale for this decision. > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 08:31, Dave Fisher wrote: >> &

Trademarks did not approve of Apache Hunter

Hi - You may have seen on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-228 and the Incubator list that Apache Hunter as a brand is not approved. The podling will need to find a new name, better sooner than later. Probably best to change after the hunter repository is created and all the code transferred. Best, Dave

Re: developer test releases?

> On Dec 10, 2024, at 4:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Dec 10, 2024, at 3:42 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 2:47 AM Keith McKenna >> > > wrote: >>> >>> Marcus wrote: Am 09.12.24 um 13:02 schrieb Jim

Re: Hunter website?

> On Dec 6, 2024, at 9:59 AM, Lari Hotari wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm starting a discussion about the website solution for the Hunter project. > > ASF provides multiple templates for different site frameworks at > https://github.com/apache/apache-website-template. I’ve had experience with p

Re: Why not Apache Office, then lending OpenOffice name in exchange for code and contributions

> On Nov 28, 2024, at 12:53 PM, py...@bsdmail.com.invalid > wrote: > > Hi, > How about branding Apache OpenOffice to "Apache Office", because Apache's > name carries well. Then, making a deal, to get code and contributions for > several years from LibreOffice to go under Apache in exchange

Re: List of manufacturers preloading OpenOffice?

While there is not an explicit packagers page, there is a professional services page here: https://www.openoffice.org/bizdev/consultants.html Support options are found here: https://www.openoffice.org/support/index.html I see two paths here: 1. Start a packagers page with a combination of compan

Re: Forum and wiki outage

Peter, I currently lack time to deeply figure out the fpm issue, but one thing to adjust is the fpm configuration to more aggressively restart fpm threads to fix memory leaks. I’m currently suspicious about Wiki plugin leaks. Best, Dave > On Nov 27, 2024, at 12:06 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > >

Re: Forum and wiki outage

I think that the fpm configuration needs some tweaks. It will take log analysis and maybe watching the box with `top` > On Nov 26, 2024, at 5:48 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > Hi. > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 2:30 PM Peter kovacs > wrote: >> >> According to the m

Re: Forum and wiki outage

I’ve restarted things, hopefully I’ll find time to understand what settings need to be adjusted. > On Nov 26, 2024, at 1:35 AM, Bidouille wrote: > > No way to access them > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoff

Re: Wiki outage

Hi - The wiki is backup. I restarted a service. Interestingly the forums on the same server were fine. Best, Dave > On Nov 22, 2024, at 6:05 AM, Bidouille wrote: > > Actually, occurs a 503 error > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hunter into the ASF Incubator

+1 - wave - ipmc > On Nov 21, 2024, at 4:15 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Following the discussion about Hunter started ten days ago > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ojr23ssmxmfsdbnojxg3q02xdl74t75j > and its proposal > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HunterProposal >

Re: Dark Blue Navigation Buttons

Hi - I find these buttons difficult myself. These buttons should always have white text on a blue background. This is a development issue and I put the users mailing list on bcc, moving this conversation to the developer list. Best, Dave > On Nov 19, 2024, at 10:58 PM, 許哲崇 wrote: > > We nee

Re: Dark Blue Navigation Buttons

Hi team, The question here is where do these Blue buttons with black text live in the codebase and what needs to be done to fix this issue? Best, Dave > On Nov 20, 2024, at 7:47 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > I find these buttons difficult myself. > > These butto

Re: Dark Blue Navigation Buttons

, Dave > On Nov 20, 2024, at 8:01 AM, michael smith wrote: > > PS Dave... do I have to join a different group to see any progress that > might be made at wherever you moved the OP? > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 9:47 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi - >> >>

Re: Dark Blue Navigation Buttons

Hi - I find these buttons difficult myself. These buttons should always have white text on a blue background. This is a development issue and I put the users mailing list on bcc, moving this conversation to the developer list. Best, Dave > On Nov 19, 2024, at 10:58 PM, 許哲崇 wrote: > > We nee

Re: [DISCUSS] Hunter Proposal

sis that can decide whether code should be deployed to production. It >> is a young project with already good diversity, and a valued user base, and >> is well positioned for the advantages that belonging in the ASF would >> bring. >> >> Here is the proposal: >>

Re: All my POI built Excel files are suddenly corrupt?

> On Nov 7, 2024, at 4:58 PM, Andreas Reichel > wrote: > > Dear All, > > good news, this has been fixed in LibreOffice last > night: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162944#c12 > > I have built LO from source and tested the POI's SXSSF files and > everything works again.

Re: icu4c

> On Nov 7, 2024, at 4:35 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni > wrote: > > Ugh ... looking at the stale branches I can't find the code. :( > FWIW, it did happen that IBM donated the code for Symphony (their OOo fork) > to the Apache Software Foundation and it was in a subversion branch, but it > either wa

Re: Forum webserver issues

> On Nov 6, 2024, at 12:19 PM, Keith McKenna > wrote: > > David wrote: >> There appear to be ongoing issues with slow loading and timeouts on >> forum.openoffice.org. > David; > > I believe that the forums are on one the VM's that is in process of being > updated. The process is “complete

Re: Forum webserver issues

I just now resolved the issues. We missed a configuration during the server move. It seems to have caught up and is working well now. Best, Dave > On Nov 5, 2024, at 1:44 PM, David wrote: > > There appear to be ongoing issues with slow loading and timeouts on > forum.openoffice.org. > >

Re: Consensus? we do have a glossary (was:Refactor of "new pmc member" doc...)

consensus vote" is confusing and ambiguous. I would be in favor of >> updating the docs around voting to avoid using "consensus" to describe a >> kind of vote, but I would suggest keeping the word around to describe the >> value and importance of consensus building, pr

Re: Progress plan??? (was Re: New icon theme)

> On Nov 1, 2024, at 7:38 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Pedro, All, > > Am 11.06.24 um 23:36 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> Hi Matthias, all >> >>> On 06/11/2024 3:27 PM WEST Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: In any case, there are quite a few inconsistencies regarding HC mode. I particu

Re: Consensus? we do have a glossary (was:Refactor of "new pmc member" doc...)

> On Oct 31, 2024, at 2:28 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > I would be in favor of removing "consensus" from our documentation. > > It has a general meaning of "group agreement" which is not how we use it > here. > > I would propose using "unanimous" instead of "consensus" as there seems to be

Re: [PR] renamed [pulsar-presto]

-Lari > > On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 16:57, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> It would make sense to mark this repository as read-only. >> >> Thanks, >> Dave >> >>> On Oct 17, 2024, at 10:34 PM, lhotari (via GitHub) wrote: >>> >>> >

Re: [PR] renamed [pulsar-presto]

It would make sense to mark this repository as read-only. Thanks, Dave > On Oct 17, 2024, at 10:34 PM, lhotari (via GitHub) wrote: > > > lhotari closed pull request #10: renamed > URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-presto/pull/10 > > > -- > This is an automated message from the Apache Gi

Re: [PR] PCIP-1: Distributed RPC framework implemented by the Pulsar client [pulsar-java-contrib]

t the project from being deformed. >>> >>> If the PCIP process is simplified to just make developers of the Pulsar >>> community known, do you think it is necessary? >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 1:24 AM Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [Bug 66462] Read author of threaded comments

Anyone know how to deal with this bugzilla spam? Best, Dave > On Oct 16, 2024, at 8:56 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462 > > --- Comment #3 from Barry Cummings --- > Thank you for your kind words! Here’s a refined version of your appreciati

Re: git translation split into an po branch and a sdf branch (or seperate into 2 repos.)

> On Oct 16, 2024, at 2:27 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > hi all. > > > mechtilde has set up a translation git repository for the process to save > translations in case something goes wrong with the conversion. > > I added now a githup repository and i would like to convert our scripts that

Re: missing commit stats for a few projects

Hi - If you want to know about the tooling position then: 1) The position has been posted. 2) VP, Tooling is currently Myrle Krantz. Best, Dave > On Oct 13, 2024, at 8:34 AM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> I'm actually not sure where the discussion of the requirements for a > tooling position is h

Re: [PR] PCIP-1: Distributed RPC framework implemented by the Pulsar client [pulsar-java-contrib]

This is in no way a comment about the proposed work. In fact that work should proceed. This is about what looks like extraneous process. I thought that the purpose of this new repository was to streamline and ease the development of new ideas and contributions. Adding a new PCIP process seems t

Re: icu4c

> On Oct 10, 2024, at 7:49 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Arrigo, All, > > Am 05.10.24 um 07:42 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello Pedro, >> >> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 09:53:04AM +0100, Pedro Lino wrote: >> >>> Hi Arrigo, Matthias >>> > I don't expect problems, but it would be int

Re: [DISCUSS][IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

at 11:22 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > That's right Dave, but as I checked the ip clearance statement, I just > wanted to say that it looks good to me :) > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:14 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> The long

Re: OpenOffice for Mac silicon?

Did you try OpenOffice 4.15.3 on your M3? As I understand it OpenOffice should run fine with Rosetta. Best, Dave > On Sep 24, 2024, at 2:21 PM, Randall Horton > wrote: > > I’ve been a devoted OpenOffice user for 14 years on a Windows PC and one of > my reasons for selecting it was its portab

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-264: Enhanced OTel-based metric system

s API. But if we can't maintain >>>>>>>>>> compatibility then it's a big red flag and not acceptable for >>>> the >>>>>>>> Pulsar >>>>>>>>>> community. >>>>>&g

[DISCUSS][IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS. Thanks, Dave > On Sep 24, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM Andy Grove wrote: >> >> Apache DataFusion is receiving a donation of sqlparser-rs [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Revisit PIP voting max time

> On Sep 23, 2024, at 8:07 PM, Yunze Xu wrote: > > I have similar concerns for it. Some PIPs might not get enough > attention. Generally I agree with the proposal that a PIP should be > treated as "approved" if > - there is at least 1 binding +1 vote > - there is no binding -1 vote > - the vot

Re: New committer and PPMC member: Markos Volikas

> On Sep 21, 2024, at 8:17 AM, Julien Nioche wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) > has invited Markos Volikas to become a committer and a PPMC member and we > are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Congratulations! Best, Dave >

Re: Podling release without IPMC vote

An important question to ask is if the VOTE on the dev list included 3 of the podling’s Mentors. If it did then it already had 3 +1 IPMC (binding) Votes and the general@ vote should quickly have those carried over by those mentors. Best, Dave > On Sep 9, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Daniel B. Widdis wro

Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings

HI Craig, This is a good idea, and would save the secretary time when checking an account request. Having a parsable email saves a large amount of time. Where do you plan to document this prescription? Best, Dave > On Sep 6, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to dis

Re: Allocation Errors

When making a report about errors we need more information in order to help you. 1. What OS are you on and what version? For example, Windows 10 or macOS Sonoma. 2. Which version of Apache OpenOffice are you using? Is it the latest 4.1.15? 3. Are you using Writer? 4. What type of graphic are you i

Re: updating the translation process

> On Aug 13, 2024, at 4:27 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello all. > > as you all know the translation process is stuck. Let me sum up the process, > issue and my proposed solution. > > the basics > > We still use a SDF- definition file for our UI elements. The main benefit is > that it is

Re: [PR] [fix] [meta] Oxia metadta store: Convert error to MetadataStoreException if operation failed [pulsar]

Hi Yunze, Given your comment on the DISCUSSION thread abut the extra repository. > - Metadata store. From my personal perspective, I don't suggest making > InMemory, Etcd, Oxia as the built-in implementations. Having ZK as > default and RocksDB for a lightweight standalone is enough. I have to a

Re: [VOTE] PIP-367 Propose a Contributor Repository for Pulsar

+1 (binding) > On Aug 5, 2024, at 5:53 AM, Yunze Xu wrote: > > -1 (binding) > > See reasons here: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0mold5ko1z3t8pjwb46bt07o2lcqh0oy I find some of these reasons “disturbing” and think that the line of project vendor independence is being crossed - https://com

RE: Re: [DISCUSS] Propose a Contributor Repository for Pulsar

who have shown > > > > support for my recent proposal. Your feedback and encouragement are > > > > greatly appreciated and have been instrumental in moving the > > > > discussion forward. > > > > > > > > I am pleased to announce that

Re: [DISCUSS] Propose a Contributor Repository for Pulsar

omponent` you > mentioned. > > In addition, regarding the SECURITY.md file, I have added it to the > repository. [0] > > Best Regards > > xiangying > > [0] - > https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib/blob/stable/SECURITY.md > > On Mon, Jul 29, 20

Re: [VOTE] Accept Polaris into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Aug 2, 2024, at 10:26 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Following the discussion about Polaris > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ymz26dr3bzldbntdgpctbtkb787x311d), > and after updating the proposal based on comments, I would like to > start the for

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

l is solid, the contributions (code and non >> code) are there, the community is small but eager to grow (and that's >> the purpose of the incubator). >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:39 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >&

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

Hi Justin, > In short, this seems to me (and I could be wrong) like a project mostly from > a single vendor, but the proposal has been made to make it look like more > people are involved. It may well be that these people will be involved, but > I’d prefer if the project was upfront about this

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

> On Jul 31, 2024, at 6:56 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I understand your comment, and it's important to me. >> If it's a concern for you, I'm happy to rework the initial committer >> list with the team (also removing PPMC list to use the default layout) >> and grow the PPMC/committe

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

growing the PPMC and Committer base. Best, Dave > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 8:19 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi JB, >> >> An interesting project that looks pretty mature. >> >> I’m curious about the split between Initial PPM

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

Hi JB, An interesting project that looks pretty mature. I’m curious about the split between Initial PPMC and initial Committer. In the usual case a new podling will have all of the Initial Committers on the PPMC. Can you tell us why this is not the case with Polaris? Best, Dave > On Jul 30, 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Propose a Contributor Repository for Pulsar

> On Jul 29, 2024, at 6:37 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Il giorno lun 29 lug 2024 alle ore 11:55 steven lu > ha scritto: > >> Different from pulsar-adapters, we added some instructions and examples >> here https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib > > > This example is clear, than

Re: Website IPv6 broken

Would you please try these domains as well. www.openoffice.org www.apache.org Depending on the results I’ll discuss this issue with the ASF’s sysadmins. Thanks, Dave > On Jul 23, 2024, at 1:27 PM, Marco Moock wrote: > > Hello! > > Currently IPv6 for openoffice.org isn't reachable. > > m@ryz

Re: Query on Open Office building guide on kali Linux VM

Hi Harsh, Welcome to Apache OpenOffice. > On Jul 23, 2024, at 5:10 AM, Harsh Giri <2006.harshg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Greetings Dev Team, > I'm looking to install OpenOffice and wanted to check if there are any > specific recommendations: > > 1. Should I install it on my Kali Linux virtual

Re: Inquiry about contributing to Apache OpenOffice(R)

In addition to those locations you should subscribe to the mailing list by sending an email to dev-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org. You can then ask about how to build OpenOffice on your operating system of choice. Best, Dave > On Jul 22, 2024, at 3:36 AM, Aditya Sharma wrote: > > Hello Harsh

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Liminal podling

+1 (binding) > On Jul 11, 2024, at 6:41 AM, Ayush Saxena wrote: > > +1 (Binding) > > -Ayush > >> On 11 Jul 2024, at 6:50 PM, Xuanwo wrote: >> >> +1 binding. Good luck after retiring. >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 21:16, PJ Fanning wrote: >>> +1 binding - looks like the right decision bas

Re: [QUESTION] Can we use an AGPL components [minio] in OpenServerless?

HI - The first place to go is to check on license availability is the legal resolved page[1]. There you can learn the various classes of dependencies as well as resolved issues about licenses that have already discussed on legal-disc...@apache.org [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html

Re: Bylaws != Guidelines

Top post, but if my memory serves me properly Guidelines was used because the ASF’s ByLaws - https://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html - must not be overridden by project “bylaws”. Best, Dave > On Jul 3, 2024, at 12:35 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > > In 2018, Justin McLean led an effort to

Re: PMC is a committee

t;>>> To be honest, I've never really paid much attention when someone >>>>>>> stated >>>>>>> they're a PMC. I knew what was meant and just auto corrected it >>>>>>> in my head. >>>>>>> I have used,

Re: OWASP Dependency-Check Maven plugin failing to download NVD database in Pulsar CI

> On Jul 3, 2024, at 6:06 AM, Lari Hotari wrote: > > Hi, > > In Apache Pulsar, we use the OWASP Dependency-Check maven plugin to report > vulnerabilities in dependencies in apache/pulsar GitHub Actions workflows. > > The Dependency Check maven plugin will download the NVD database which ta

Re: PMC is a committee

someone >>>>> stated >>>>> they're a PMC. I knew what was meant and just auto corrected it >>>>> in my head. >>>>> I have used, without fully thinking about it, PMC as, "I am a >>>>> PMC" as well. >>>>

Re: PMC is a committee

Hi Tison, I’m sympathetic as well. > On Jul 2, 2024, at 5:11 PM, tison wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > I saw this kind of thread many times, and I also corrected it dozens > of times. Actually, this is part of the reason for [1] ("Maintainer" > as an alias of PMC Member?). > > [1] https://lists.apach

[jira] [Commented] (COMDEV-422) Many crashes. Does not recover completely.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17859968#comment-17859968 ] Dave Fisher commented on COMDEV-422: [~rtrostel] you could also look at h

Re: Using Github Actions Trusted Publisher for PyPI releases ?

> On Jun 25, 2024, at 12:54 AM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > FYI. I created a proposal [1] in Airflow to switch to the Trusted Publisher > workflow and providing consensus, we will implement it. This is cool. > > BTW. Interesting finding - I found out while reading docs, that it's > recommended t

Re: Using Github Actions Trusted Publisher for PyPI releases ?

> On Jun 25, 2024, at 12:54 AM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > FYI. I created a proposal [1] in Airflow to switch to the Trusted Publisher > workflow and providing consensus, we will implement it. This is cool. > > BTW. Interesting finding - I found out while reading docs, that it's > recommended t

Re: What happened to our document repository for type detection tests?

> On Jun 22, 2024, at 6:59 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 22.06.24 um 14:53 schrieb Bidouille: >>> I remember from old time that the QA team at Sun/Oracle had really a >>> lot of documents for general and special testing. >>> >>> These were not part of the code repository and were loaded from their

Re: icu4c

You submitted a report to secur...@openoffice.apache.org This is being analyzed by the security team, but we have not found that we use the interface that raised the CVE. Sorry if we aren’t quick enough responding to you. If you wish to look into the issue yourself - https://github.com/apache/

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenServerless into the ASF incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Jun 11, 2024, at 8:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> ...Following the discussion about OpenServerless [1], I'm starting a vote >> to accept OpenServerless into the ASF incubator... > > +1 >

Re: svn commit: r1918174 - /poi/site/src/documentation/release-guide.txt

Wow. That’s been out of date for a long time. > On Jun 5, 2024, at 9:10 AM, fannin...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: fanningpj > Date: Wed Jun 5 16:10:19 2024 > New Revision: 1918174 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1918174&view=rev > Log: > update release doc > > Modified: >poi/si

Re: What is sufficient Incubation notification for Git repos?

I made the following comment on the PR, but will include it here as well. > Looks reasonable and points to the important detail. I would only add that if > the podling is releasing with DISCLAIMER-WIP that the linked DISCLAIMER > should be the DISCLAIMER-WIP with that added information. Best, D

Re: What is sufficient Incubation notification for Git repos?

I made the following comment on the PR, but will include it here as well. > Looks reasonable and points to the important detail. I would only add that if > the podling is releasing with DISCLAIMER-WIP that the linked DISCLAIMER > should be the DISCLAIMER-WIP with that added information. Best, D

Re: [QUESTION] KIE - NPM package names

Here’s my 2 cents. Incubation is a journey, and if there are parts that are yet to be compliant that should be fine. In the end all will be squared away. For the IPMC - should we have something like DISCLAIMER-WIP for binary convenience packaging? Best, Dave > On May 15, 2024, at 1:13 PM, Tia

Re: New Release to get rid of CVE

Hi Stephan, Two answers. 1) Please list the CVEs that would be fixed. It’s quite possible they have no impact on POI or XMLBeans. 2) Please consider submitting a PR to make the fix. We can always use more contributors and everyone here is a volunteer. Best, Dave > On May 15, 2024, at 2:23 AM

Re: [VOTE] Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.0 Release Candidate 2

Caring over my +1 (Binding) from the dev list VOTE thread. Best, Dave > On May 13, 2024, at 12:41 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler > (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing. > > This is our first release afte

Re: [VOTE] Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.0 Release Candidate 2

ver the weekend. Best, Dave > > Thx und Gruß > Richard > > Am 10. Mai 2024 03:36:13 MESZ schrieb Dave Fisher : >> You are correct. When we go to general@incubator swap Source with Maven. >> >>> On May 9, 2024, at 1:45 PM, Richard Zowalla wrote: >>&

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >