> On Jan 3, 2025, at 2:13 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> 2. Question, does the whole repository need the same license? e.g.
>> including documentation and examples?
>
> It would be preferable to re-license as many files as possible to the Apache
> license, but ASF projects can include 3rd party code under a compatible
> license like BSD.
>
>> 4. Segmenting contributions (Hamilton has 67, Burr has 17):
>> - core -> getting CLAs for core contributions should be straightforward 🤞.
>> - examples -> not part of the packaged software, can get CLAs on best
>> effort, else just preserve original copyright. If someone complains, is
>> removal an option?
>> - documentation -> not part of the packaged software, can get CLAs on best
>> effort, else just preserve original copyright. If someone complains, is
>> removal an option?
>
> Removal is an option if someone does complain.
>
> If you need ICLAs for contributors depends on how the project handles
> copyright, in some cases, copyright is assigned to the entity who owns the
> repo, in that case we would only need a CCLA from that entity.
Don’t you mean SGA (and not CCLA)?
Best,
Dave
>
> To cover all eventualities, I would try and get ICLAs from anyone who made a
> significant contribution and a CCLA from DAGWorks.
>
> Also, you don’t need to get all CLAs before joining the Incubator, but you
> would need them before moving the repos. [1]
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/transitioning_asf.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
