Re: Mail-Followup-To description

2000-05-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Frank Derichsweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 
May 2000:
> MFT is described in the manual, yes. But the other header modifications
> (e.g. myhdr ) are displayed within the editor. Therefore I would like
> to see a line. "Please note, that MFT header is generated after
> editing the mail just before actually transmitting it via smtp".

Good idea.  Why don't you submit a patch? :-)

> Using list-reply, mutt knows, that I am replying to the List,
> therefore could add the MFT for that list.

Yes, but as you say yourself...

> Yes, I could use list-reply and add cc to another list ...

So it can be either one way or another, but not both.  Either Mutt will
check the list of recipients only at send time, or it will do it
earlier. :-)

> No problem with the mutt behaviour, just an idea to prevent somebody
> else from spending too much time with trying to produce MFT headers ...

Ahh, right.


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
cat, n.: A lap-warmer with a built-in buzzer.



mailbox sort order

2000-05-15 Thread Hardy Merrill

I sent a similar message a week or two ago, but didn't get
any responses that helped solve my problem - so I'm trying
again.  I have these folder-hook's defined in my muttrc:

folder-hook =INBOX-Mutt set sort=reverse_date_received
folder-hook =in-l-dbiusers set sort=threads
folder-hook =in-l-muttusers set sort=threads

I'm noticing that then I view either dbiusers or muttusers
mailbox, and then go back to INBOX-Mutt, that the order
of the INBOX-Mutt is *NOT* reverse_date_received like
I specified - I have to manually sort it each time I
go back to it.

Is this the way it is supposed to work, or is there a way
I can make Mutt show me INBOX-Mutt sorted by
reverse_date_received each time I view it?

Thanks.

-- 
Hardy Merrill
Mission Critical Linux, LLC
http://www.missioncriticallinux.com



Deleting IMAP folders - is it possible?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

Is there any way to delete IMAP folders (as opposed to mailboxes)
using mutt?

I am trying to delete a folder on my Courier IMAP server and just get
the message "Cannot delete selected folder.", I'm not even sure if the
message is from Courier IMAP or from mutt.

In fact I'm even more confused, this isn't a folder really, it's a
mailbox as all it had in it (until I deleted them all) was messages,
no sub-folders.  All I'm trying to do is delete the, now empty,
mailbox.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



Re: Maildir support in Procmail 3.14 -- how?

2000-05-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Russell Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> Since procmail 3.14 supports the maildir mailbox format,

... this is somewhat off-topic for this list, but well, I'll do my best
to answer your question.

> So how do I get the new procmail to deliver to maildirs without the previously
> necessary add-ons?  I know that I'm calling version 3.14 of procmail in my
> .forward file, and I use the trailing slash in all recipes.

This is AFAIK all you should need to do.  I don't use 3.14 myself (have
a patched version instead), but I have at least one success report from
a net-acquintance that the Maildir support in 3.14 works.

So, in other words, sounds like you're doing everything right but it
doesn't work.  You may want to investigate this or ask for help on a
procmail list. :-)

> Also -- is it still necessary with the new procmail to generate a lines header?

I don't know, but I'm guessing "yes".


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
This sentence does, in fact, not have the property it claims not to have.



Default to IMAP, was Re: pkspxycwrap?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:46:23AM -0400, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> 
> And in other news...how does one set a "default" server to use? For
> example, have mutt go directly to an IMAP server instead of having to c?
> to it?
> 
Set your $folder and $spoolfile to point to your IMAP server, you
might want to set $record to point there as well.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



Re: 'browser' - what is it?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 04:51:34PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 11:43:52AM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 08:57:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > > > In general I think I'd prefer the browser to *always* start from
> > > > $folder...
> > 
> > > There is a rather uncomfortable way to achieve this. Type
> > > c?cPath/to/folder
> > 
> > And this could be made a folder hook, couldn't it.
> 
> Unfortunately the  prompt can't be overtyped as it is with
> the  prompt. Does anybody know the reason for this?
> Currently you would have to delete the string at the prompt first which
> is kind of difficult within a macro.
> 
As I just reported when I tried it.


> A very clumsy way to do it would be
> macro index  c?c...[as often as
> needed]/path/to/$folder\n
> 
There's an easier way - CTRL/U deletes the whole line of input, at
least it does on this system.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



$folder_format and IMAP

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

What would other IMAP users feel about moving the "IMAP +" field which
is put in the %F field in $folder_format to somewhere else?

I have two problems with it in the %F field:-

1 - With the default $folder_format it's much to far from the folder
name, e.g. I get:-

->  1 IMAP  ../
2 IMAP  Trash
3 IMAP  bike
4 IMAP +buying.
5 IMAP  family.
6 IMAP +friends.
7 IMAP  internet.
8 IMAP +isbd.
9 IMAP  linux.
   10 IMAP  regs
   11 IMAP +riding.
   12 IMAP  sam
   13 IMAP  selling
   14 IMAP  subdir.
   15 IMAP  test

which makes it quite difficult to spot which folders have the +
against them.


2 - I'd prefer *not* to have the %F field appear at all when I'm
viewing local folders, it doesn't tell me anything I want to know.

I know I could sort this out using folder_hook but the defaults are a
little 'un-ideal' to my mind.

Could we maybe have a special format specifier for the IMAP field?


Oh, and one other little moan looking at the above IMAP folder
directory, those '.' characters indicating a folder with sub-folders,
is there any way to choose a more visible character?

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



What does the 'X' mean?

2000-05-15 Thread Kelly Scroggins

Every message I receieve has an 'X' in the column where the status is
displayed.  It's right next to the 'N' (new message) or the reply (r) 
designation.

What does the 'X' mean?

I think it first showed up around the time I was changing .muttrc files.
I don't know if that has something to do with it or not.

Thanks,
Kelly




Re: mailbox sort order

2000-05-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> folder-hook =INBOX-Mutt set sort=reverse_date_received
> folder-hook =in-l-dbiusers set sort=threads
> folder-hook =in-l-muttusers set sort=threads
> 
> I'm noticing that then I view either dbiusers or muttusers
> mailbox, and then go back to INBOX-Mutt, that the order
> of the INBOX-Mutt is *NOT* reverse_date_received like
> I specified - I have to manually sort it each time I
> go back to it.

This would indicate that the folder-hook is not executing, for whatever
reason.  It certainly should set the sort order if it does execute.

You may want to try drop the = from the folder-hook patterns, so it'll
match only against the folder's name, not the full path.  Of course,
the hook will then match any folder called "INBOX-Mutt" in your
system, but I'm guessing you only have one such folder.


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
"OK, I'm weird, but I'm saving up to be eccentric."



Mail-Followup-To description

2000-05-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler

Hi List,

after trying to generate MFT headers and finally setting up a test
list, I would like to suggest to add the following to the manual:

Using  list-reply will produce a MFT header (iff followup_to is set)
just before sending the mail. The MFT header is *NOT* shown in the
mail editor.

Feature wish:
IMHO it would be better to generate it in oder to be able to "see" it
within the mail editor.

Or is it possible by setting a variable?
I know I could set a myhdr field, but ...

Just my 2 cent

Frank

PS
Congratulations for the new 1.2i release!!!



Re: 'browser' - what is it?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 11:43:52AM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 08:57:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > > In general I think I'd prefer the browser to *always* start from
> > > $folder...
> 
> > There is a rather uncomfortable way to achieve this. Type
> > c?cPath/to/folder
> 
> And this could be made a folder hook, couldn't it. I had the
> opposite problem. I wanted to get back to the place in the
> mailboxes screen I had just been so I now have 38 folder-hooks in
> my .muttrc of the form:
> 
> folder-hook . 'macro index h ?0'
> folder-hook '!' 'macro index h ?1'
> folder-hook =tn 'macro index h ?2'
> 
Yes, that's OK if the folders are relatively unchanging.

I did experiment with a dummy folder in my local hierarchy called
'remote' or some such that had a folder hook to change to the remote
IMAP server.  With the extra ideas I now have about using the browser
I may resurrect this idea.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



Maildir support in Procmail 3.14 -- how?

2000-05-15 Thread Russell Hoover

Since procmail 3.14 supports the maildir mailbox format, I would assume that
means, using it with mutt, that I can get rid of the maildir.c delivery program
I've been using for the last couple of years,

and that I can change my procmail recipes from one like this:

:0
* ^TO.*mutt-(users|users-request)
|maildir Mail/m/

to one like this:

:0
* ^TO.*mutt-(users|users-request)
~/Mail/m/

and have things work smoothly.  But when I get rid of maildir.c and remove
"|maildir " from the recipes, all my messages end up in the ~/Mail/m/ directory
*alongside* the cur/, new/ and tmp/ subdirectories, not *inside* any of them, as
they should.

So how do I get the new procmail to deliver to maildirs without the previously
necessary add-ons?  I know that I'm calling version 3.14 of procmail in my
.forward file, and I use the trailing slash in all recipes.

Also -- is it still necessary with the new procmail to generate a lines header?
In other words, can I remove the following from my .procmailrc?

# ---
# Generate a "Lines:" header
# (needed for maildir mailbox format)
# Only msg-body lines are counted (not the hdrs):

:0 bw
LINES=|wc -l | tr -d " "

:0 fhw
|formail -a "Lines: $LINES"
# ---

Thanks.

-- 
 // [EMAIL PROTECTED] //





Re: mailbox sort order

2000-05-15 Thread Michael Tatge

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:01:13AM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> I sent a similar message a week or two ago, but didn't get
> any responses that helped solve my problem - so I'm trying
> again.  I have these folder-hook's defined in my muttrc:
> 
> folder-hook =INBOX-Mutt set sort=reverse_date_received
> folder-hook =in-l-dbiusers set sort=threads
> folder-hook =in-l-muttusers set sort=threads
> 
> I'm noticing that then I view either dbiusers or muttusers
> mailbox, and then go back to INBOX-Mutt, that the order
> of the INBOX-Mutt is *NOT* reverse_date_received like
> I specified - I have to manually sort it each time I
> go back to it.

The sort option is 'reverse-date-received' try this one. BTW you could
shorten is one by:

folder-hook . set sort=threads # if this is what you want
folder-hook =INBOX-Mutt set sort=reverse-date-received

When you alter options with hooks you normally want to set a default,
that 'resets' your option.

Michael
-- 
You have junk mail.

PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65  40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13



double mutt-users messages

2000-05-15 Thread Hardy Merrill

This has happened to me a few times - probably another
stupid mistake.  I've always had the same email
address([EMAIL PROTECTED]) since I've
been using mutt, but sometimes I start receiving the
same message twice - I get every message on the
mutt-users list twice.  I've tried unsubscribing, and
then subscribing, and each time I get the same
result.

This was probably caused by "me" - when I switched over
to mutt from netscape(IMAP), I had a problem with
sendmail - which may have caused me to be subscribed
to the list under a different domain.  Is there a way
to see if I'm subscribed under more than one domain?

Thanks.

-- 
Hardy Merrill
Mission Critical Linux, LLC
http://www.missioncriticallinux.com



Re: Error Compiling 1.2 : Configure aborts if $MAIL is not set correctly

2000-05-15 Thread Thomas Roessler

On 2000-05-14 22:34:02 +0200, Rainer Gubanski wrote:

> What to do in such an "IMAP only" case ? Use homespool
> or let $MAIL point to an existing directory?

This would, for instance, work.

-- 
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/



Re: The browser (again!) - now I know what I need, but is it possible?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 11:26:32AM +0800, billy chan wrote:
> [00.05.12 15:09] Chris Green 
> > Thus I want a way to specify the directory at the times when one
> > enters the browser, there are already some special characters
> > recognised here (e.g. '?') so it should be possible to have a new
> > special character which prompts for a 'start-browsing-at' directory.
> > 
> > This would be useful in various ways I think, especially if one wants
> > to switch back and forth between IMAP folders and local folders.  It
> > would also be useful if one has two sets of 'local' mail folders deep
> > down two different directory hierarchies.
> 
> Not sure what I'm doing is what you want. I created some symbolic links
> under the mail folder to directories holding my saved posts and my own
> posts in the newsgroups. When I want to switch back and forth, I change
> folder by "c" and "=" or "=" bring me to the default. 
> 
> It's possible to set folder= which holds the only
> symbolic links to different mail directories. "c=" will bring
> you back to the topmost hierarchy.
> 
Yes, I realised that was a possible method when navigating a complex
local hierarchy.  It doesn't work for IMAP folders on a remote system
though.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



Re: mailbox sort order

2000-05-15 Thread Hardy Merrill

Dave Ewart [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Monday, 15.05.2000 at 09:01 -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> 
> > I sent a similar message a week or two ago, but didn't get
> > any responses that helped solve my problem - so I'm trying
> > again.  I have these folder-hook's defined in my muttrc:
> > 
> > folder-hook =INBOX-Mutt set sort=reverse_date_received
> > folder-hook =in-l-dbiusers set sort=threads
> > folder-hook =in-l-muttusers set sort=threads
> > 
> > I'm noticing that then I view either dbiusers or muttusers
> > mailbox, and then go back to INBOX-Mutt, that the order
> > of the INBOX-Mutt is *NOT* reverse_date_received like
> > I specified - I have to manually sort it each time I
> > go back to it.
> 
> If you've pasted those lines straight from your .muttrc, then I can see the
> problem: you need to use "-", not "_" in "reverse-date-received".

Thank you very much!  That's not the first(nor will it be the
last) stupid mistake I've made ;-)

> 
> If that's not the problem, are you setting a default folder sort order
> anywhere?
> 
> e.g.
> 
> folder-hook . set sort=date-sent
> 
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Ewart
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Computing Manager
> ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK

-- 
Hardy Merrill
Mission Critical Linux, LLC
http://www.missioncriticallinux.com



Re: Maildir vs mbox (was Re: Maildir support in Procmail 3.14 -- how?)

2000-05-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Chris Gushue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> How much
> of a speed difference would there be between that and mbox?

I think this is really rather subjective and per-system issue, whatever
figures someone else might come up with on their system might be totally
off the mark on yours.  My recommendation is that you try it out, it's
not that difficult to copy all messages from an mbox folder to a Maildir
and then compare speeds of opening those.

Although I'm not sure how you could compare the speeds without
filesystem buffering (to simulate a situation when you open the folder
after some longer time).


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
I tried to get a life once, but they were out of stock.



Re: Maildir support in Procmail 3.14 -- how?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 05:17:47AM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
> Since procmail 3.14 supports the maildir mailbox format, I would assume that
> means, using it with mutt, that I can get rid of the maildir.c delivery program
> I've been using for the last couple of years,
> 
> and that I can change my procmail recipes from one like this:
> 
> :0
> * ^TO.*mutt-(users|users-request)
> |maildir Mail/m/
> 
> to one like this:
> 
> :0
> * ^TO.*mutt-(users|users-request)
> ~/Mail/m/
> 
> and have things work smoothly.  But when I get rid of maildir.c and remove
> "|maildir " from the recipes, all my messages end up in the ~/Mail/m/ directory
> *alongside* the cur/, new/ and tmp/ subdirectories, not *inside* any of them, as
> they should.
> 
> So how do I get the new procmail to deliver to maildirs without the previously
> necessary add-ons?  I know that I'm calling version 3.14 of procmail in my
> .forward file, and I use the trailing slash in all recipes.
> 
Well my copy of procmail 3.14 is delivering happily to maildirs.

In my .prcmailrc I have:-

MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail/lists

:0:
* ^TOmutt
mutt/


[plus lots more rules of course]

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



Re: Still alive?

2000-05-15 Thread Steffan Hoeke

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 01:48:29AM +0200, clemensF muttered:
> > Mikko Hänninen (Mon 15.0500-00:40):
> > clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 14 May 2000:
> > > can this be done:  everyone may optionally supply a "backup" email-address
> > > which unsubscribe notification are forwarded to, so one at least knows
> > > what's happening?
> > 
> > Hmmm, Majordomo doesn't support something like that.  Sorry.
> 
> does anybody know of a list manager with this functionality?  this could
> prove important for desparate people...

EZMLM (http://www.ezmlm.org/) warns users for which messages bounce and
eventually removes them from the subscriber list ...

So, at least you get a warning (though not on a secondary address) but
you'll get the warnings / bounce messages evenually 

HTH,
 Steffan 

-- 
http://therookie.dyndns.org




Re: mailbox sort order

2000-05-15 Thread Dave Ewart

On Monday, 15.05.2000 at 09:48 -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:

> > > folder-hook =INBOX-Mutt set sort=reverse_date_received
> > > folder-hook =in-l-dbiusers set sort=threads
> > > folder-hook =in-l-muttusers set sort=threads
> > 
> > If you've pasted those lines straight from your .muttrc, then I can see the
> > problem: you need to use "-", not "_" in "reverse-date-received".
> 
> Thank you very much!  That's not the first(nor will it be the
> last) stupid mistake I've made ;-)

Glad to be of assistance.  I'm suprised no-one (myself included) picked it up
the last time you posted it.

Are we all asleep? (Rhetorical!)

Dave.

--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK



turning off the debug option, how??

2000-05-15 Thread Francisco D. Borges


Hello folks,


 How do I turn off the debugging support option when compiling?
 There is a --enable-debug, I've tried --disable-debug but it didn't work. 

 ->+DEBUG




latt:11:21:~ > mutt -v
Mutt 1.2i (2000-05-09)
Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details.

System: Linux 2.2.14 [using ncurses 1.9.9g]
Compile options:
-DOMAIN
+DEBUG
-HOMESPOOL  +USE_SETGID  +USE_DOTLOCK  +USE_FCNTL  +USE_FLOCK
-USE_IMAP  -USE_GSS  -USE_SSL  -USE_POP  +HAVE_REGCOMP  -USE_GNU_REGEX  
+HAVE_COLOR  +HAVE_PGP  -BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS  +ENABLE_NLS
SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail"
MAILPATH="/var/spool/mail"
SHAREDIR="/home/frandebo/prog/local//share/mutt"
SYSCONFDIR="/home/frandebo/prog/local//etc"
ISPELL="/usr/bin/ispell"
To contact the developers, please mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To report a bug, please use the muttbug utility.


configure comand used:
./configure --with-included-zlib --prefix=/home/frandebo/prog/local/   
--enable-locales-fix --with-charmaps --enable-nfs-fix 


cheers,
-- 
   Francisco.
   São Paulo, Brasil.
 __o
`\<,
 _(*)/(*)_



Re: bind pager Q query

2000-05-15 Thread clemensF

> Mikko Hänninen (Mon 15.0500-05:31):
> 
> What're you trying to do?  More specifically, what do you want to happen
> when Q is pressed in the pager?

isnt  bound in the sense of external-query?

-- 
clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do  D4685B884894C483
gpg recv-key 0x9
echo `gpg list-key 0x9` | \
gpg encrypt `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address` | \
mail -s your-key `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address`
wait
if you dont get mail within a week, you in trouble.
if you dont get mail after a month, i in trouble.
please check
done




Re: Maildir support in Procmail 3.14 -- how?

2000-05-15 Thread Christian Ordig

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 05:17:47AM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
> I know that I'm calling version 3.14 of procmail in my
> .forward file, and I use the trailing slash in all recipes.
Well, you're calling procmail from your .forward file? Which version of
procmail is the system wide one?
is procmail used by the local sendmail to deliver local eMail? If so does it
really use the 3.14?

cu.

-- 
Christian Ordig | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ 
Germany |eMail: Christian Ordig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 PGP signature


Re: bind pager Q query

2000-05-15 Thread Christian Ordig

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 04:21:54AM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> why, o why does "bind pager Q query" in .muttrc always give errors like "no
> such function"?
Q should be bound to the external query function by default. (at least I didn't
have to bind it manually)
Have you supplied the externel query command to be called when Q is pressed?

set query_command="your_command '%s'"
%s is the query string typed in mutt... your program/script has to read it
and has to "answer" to mutt in the following format:
- SNIP 
This is superquery... xyz records found!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Full Name   Comment
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Full Name   Comment
- SNAP 

A  (\t) character is to be used for seperating the columns.

cu.

-- 
Christian Ordig | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ 
Germany |eMail: Christian Ordig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 PGP signature


Re: mailbox sort order

2000-05-15 Thread Dave Ewart

On Monday, 15.05.2000 at 09:01 -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:

> I sent a similar message a week or two ago, but didn't get
> any responses that helped solve my problem - so I'm trying
> again.  I have these folder-hook's defined in my muttrc:
> 
> folder-hook =INBOX-Mutt set sort=reverse_date_received
> folder-hook =in-l-dbiusers set sort=threads
> folder-hook =in-l-muttusers set sort=threads
> 
> I'm noticing that then I view either dbiusers or muttusers
> mailbox, and then go back to INBOX-Mutt, that the order
> of the INBOX-Mutt is *NOT* reverse_date_received like
> I specified - I have to manually sort it each time I
> go back to it.

If you've pasted those lines straight from your .muttrc, then I can see the
problem: you need to use "-", not "_" in "reverse-date-received".

If that's not the problem, are you setting a default folder sort order
anywhere?

e.g.

folder-hook . set sort=date-sent

Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK



Re: Deleting IMAP folders - is it possible?

2000-05-15 Thread Sven Guckes

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000515 15:19]:
> Is there any way to delete IMAP folders
> (as opposed to mailboxes) using mutt?

Not sure - IMAP is not listed with the
description to "save_empty" (see below).

The section "4.11. IMAP Support (OPTIONAL)"
of the manual needs an update.  Anyone?

Sven  [no IMAP mailbox to test this]

===
  The Mutt E-Mail Client by Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  version 1.2

  6.3.168.  save_empty -- Type: boolean -- Default: yes
  When unset, mailboxes which contain no saved messages
  will be removed when closed (the exception is ``spoolfile''
  which is never removed).  If set, mailboxes are never removed.

  Note: This only applies to mbox and MMDF folders,
  Mutt does not delete MH and Maildir directories.



REs for folder-hook

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

I am trying to set my folder_format using folder-hook, I'm having
terrible trouble generating any RE that matches a folder at all at the
moment.

In my muttrc I have:-

folder-hook . 'set folder_format="%N  %7s %f"'

which works OK, I do get that folder_format, for *everything*!


The question is how to match a remote IMAP folder name, the folder
name will always start "{x-1.net:50143}" but whatever I try doesn't
seem to work.  I have even tried matching some local folders but I
can't get them to work either.

I have triend 
folder-hook x-1 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
folder-hook 50143 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
folder-hook .x-1 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'


folder-hook ^{ 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"a
which I found in one of the sample muttrc files just produces an
error.

I also tried:-
folder-hook AFM 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
to match a local folder called AFM but that didn't work either.


I am fairly familiar with REs.  However it's not clear (to me) from
the mutt documetnation how the folder-hook REs are supposed to
matchshould they match anywhere in the folder name or do they always
start matching from the first character?  Also does one have to match
the whole string?


Oh, and yes, I do have the '.' folder-hook command first.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



Re: Maildir vs mbox

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Gushue

Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Chris Gushue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> > How much
> > of a speed difference would there be between that and mbox?
> 
> I think this is really rather subjective and per-system issue, whatever
> figures someone else might come up with on their system might be totally
> off the mark on yours.  My recommendation is that you try it out, it's
> not that difficult to copy all messages from an mbox folder to a Maildir
> and then compare speeds of opening those.

I decided to give it a try (nothing better than first-hand experience), and
there doesn't seem to be any difference in the speed of opening a
folder. But I only have a week or so of mail to test it on, at most around
200 messages in a folder. I did notice a nice difference in the speed of
closing a folder, when it updates what mail is read or not. Right now I only
have a really old and slow hard drive, I'm sure that is affecting it :) I
guess I'll notice how much of a difference there is at the end of the month
just before procmail starts sorting mail into ~/mail/2000/06
 
> Although I'm not sure how you could compare the speeds without
> filesystem buffering (to simulate a situation when you open the folder
> after some longer time).

-- 
Thank you, Bill Cosby, you saved the Simpsons!

-- Homer Simpson
   Saturdays of Thunder



Re: Still alive?

2000-05-15 Thread clemensF

> Steffan Hoeke (Mon 15.0500-12:02):
> 
> EZMLM (http://www.ezmlm.org/) warns users for which messages bounce and
> eventually removes them from the subscriber list ...

exactly what i would like to be used by...

-- 
clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do  D4685B884894C483
gpg recv-key 0x9
echo `gpg list-key 0x9` | \
gpg encrypt `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address` | \
mail -s your-key `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address`
wait
if you dont get mail within a week, you in trouble.
if you dont get mail after a month, i in trouble.
please check
done




Re: turning off the debug option, how??

2000-05-15 Thread Christian Ordig

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 11:31:18AM -0300, Francisco D. Borges wrote:
> 
> Hello folks,
> 
> 
>  How do I turn off the debugging support option when compiling?
>  There is a --enable-debug, I've tried --disable-debug but it didn't work. 
> 
> configure comand used:
> ./configure --with-included-zlib --prefix=/home/frandebo/prog/local/   
>   --enable-locales-fix --with-charmaps --enable-nfs-fix 
> 
after configuring the program you can easyly modify the Makefile...
or you simply strip the mutt binary after building it.

-- 
Christian Ordig | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ 
Germany |eMail: Christian Ordig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 PGP signature


Re: Still alive?

2000-05-15 Thread Steffan Hoeke

Sorry,
But i'm not exactly sure what you want/mean :-(

Bye,
 Steffan

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 06:39:05PM +0200, clemensF muttered:
> > Steffan Hoeke (Mon 15.0500-12:02):
> > 
> > EZMLM (http://www.ezmlm.org/) warns users for which messages bounce and
> > eventually removes them from the subscriber list ...
> 
> exactly what i would like to be used by...
> 
> -- 
> clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   do  D4685B884894C483
>   gpg recv-key 0x9
>   echo `gpg list-key 0x9` | \
>   gpg encrypt `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address` | \
>   mail -s your-key `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address`
>   wait
>   if you dont get mail within a week, you in trouble.
>   if you dont get mail after a month, i in trouble.
>   please check
>   done
> 

-- 
http://therookie.dyndns.org




Re: mailbox sort order

2000-05-15 Thread clemensF

> Dave Ewart (Mon 15.0500-14:36):
> 
> If you've pasted those lines straight from your .muttrc, then I can see the
> problem: you need to use "-", not "_" in "reverse-date-received".

you see, a mechanic could get fired for _- > 0.5 !


-- 
clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do  D4685B884894C483
gpg recv-key 0x9
echo `gpg list-key 0x9` | \
gpg encrypt `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address` | \
mail -s your-key `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address`
wait
if you dont get mail within a week, you in trouble.
if you dont get mail after a month, i in trouble.
please check
done




What `resend-message' do?? (It's not in 1.2 manual)

2000-05-15 Thread Francisco D. Borges

 Shouldn't it REsend the edited message??? I'm sending one message to myself
 (which I receive accordingly) but if I go the sent-mail folder and
 ``resend-message'' I don't receive a new copy.

 Since this function is NOT listed in the manual:

 What exactly does the `resend-message' function??


-- 
   Francisco.
   São Paulo, Brasil.
 __o
`\<,
 _(*)/(*)_



Re: Deleting IMAP folders - is it possible?

2000-05-15 Thread clemensF

> Chris Green (Mon 15.0500-15:39):
> Is there any way to delete IMAP folders (as opposed to mailboxes)
> using mutt?

if you enjoy the neccessary priviledges on the place hosting your
imap-folders, it should work, n'est-ce-pas?

-- 
clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do  D4685B884894C483
gpg recv-key 0x9
echo `gpg list-key 0x9` | \
gpg encrypt `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address` | \
mail -s your-key `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address`
wait
if you dont get mail within a week, you in trouble.
if you dont get mail after a month, i in trouble.
please check
done




Re: Deleting IMAP folders - is it possible?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 07:19:44PM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> > Chris Green (Mon 15.0500-15:39):
> > Is there any way to delete IMAP folders (as opposed to mailboxes)
> > using mutt?
> 
> if you enjoy the neccessary priviledges on the place hosting your
> imap-folders, it should work, n'est-ce-pas?
> 
Well I should do, the IMAP server is running as a user process, all
the files are in my user area and all the files are owned and
writeable by me.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



Controlling default in save command?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Woodfield

How does one control the default string that's populated when you save a
message? Or in my case, not have one? At the moment (usint the default
.muttrc), the default is "=".

My ideal would be the default to be the argument given with the last save
command (like pine)...

-Chris

---
Christopher A. Woodfield[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finger for public PGP key 0xB887618B - email for fingerprint



Re: Mutt and address books

2000-05-15 Thread clemensF

> Mikko Hänninen (Mon 15.0500-00:58):
> be integrated with Mutt with the external-query command in any address

excuse me:  whats the name of "the external-query command"?
 gives errors (in 1.0.1).

-- 
clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do  D4685B884894C483
gpg recv-key 0x9
echo `gpg list-key 0x9 | cat -tv` | \
gpg encrypt `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address` | \
mail -s your-key `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address`
wait
[encrypted] return mail within a week.
no return mail within a week, you in trouble.
no return mail after a month, i in trouble.
please check
done




Re: Deleting IMAP folders - is it possible?

2000-05-15 Thread clemensF

> Chris Green (Mon 15.0500-18:29):
> Well I should do, the IMAP server is running as a user process, all
> the files are in my user area and all the files are owned and
> writeable by me.

what does the imap protocol say?  does mutt send a valid delete-request?


-- 
clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do  D4685B884894C483
gpg recv-key 0x9
echo `gpg list-key 0x9 | cat -tv` | \
gpg encrypt `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address` | \
mail -s your-key `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address`
wait
[encrypted] return mail.
no return mail within a week, you in trouble.
no return mail after a month, i in trouble.
please check
done




Re: Controlling default in save command?

2000-05-15 Thread Steffan Hoeke

You could use save-hook with, for example
save-hook "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"  +target
or
save-hook "~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]"   +target
or
save-hook "~C [EMAIL PROTECTED]"   +target

Take a look at http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.14

HTH,
 Steffan

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 01:51:19PM -0400, Chris Woodfield muttered:
> How does one control the default string that's populated when you save a
> message? Or in my case, not have one? At the moment (usint the default
> .muttrc), the default is "=".
> 
> My ideal would be the default to be the argument given with the last save
> command (like pine)...
> 
> -Chris
> 
> ---
> Christopher A. Woodfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Finger for public PGP key 0xB887618B - email for fingerprint

-- 
http://therookie.dyndns.org




Re: Mutt and address books

2000-05-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen

clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> > Mikko Hänninen (Mon 15.0500-00:58):
> > be integrated with Mutt with the external-query command in any address
> 
> excuse me:  whats the name of "the external-query command"?
>  gives errors (in 1.0.1).

Ahh.

What you're looking for is "complete-query" in the editor context
(Mutt's own internal line editor).  By default, it's bound to ctrl-T
So you can press ^T at any prompt where you're supposed to give an
email address, and it'll launch the external program.  The program
which is used is set with the $query_command Mutt variable.

If you want to use something else than ^T, it's set with a line
such as this:

  bind editor ^T complete-query

(replace ^T in the above with your keybinding of choice)


Hope this helps,
Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
Some people wouldn't recognize subtlety if it hit them on the head.



Re: Mutt and address books

2000-05-15 Thread clemensF

> Mikko Hänninen (Mon 15.0500-22:05):
> 
>   bind editor ^T complete-query
> 
> Ahh.

Ahh.

-- 
clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do  D4685B884894C483
gpg recv-key 0x9
echo `gpg list-key 0x9 | cat -tv` | \
gpg encrypt `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address` | \
mail -s your-key `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address`
wait
[encrypted] return mail.
no return mail within a week, you in trouble.
no return mail after a month, i in trouble.
please check
done




Re: REs for folder-hook

2000-05-15 Thread Michael Tatge

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 04:42:51PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> I am trying to set my folder_format using folder-hook, I'm having
> terrible trouble generating any RE that matches a folder at all at the
> moment.
> 
> folder-hook . 'set folder_format="%N  %7s %f"'
> 
> which works OK, I do get that folder_format, for *everything*!
> The question is how to match a remote IMAP folder name, the folder
> name will always start "{x-1.net:50143}" but whatever I try doesn't
> seem to work.  I have even tried matching some local folders but I
> can't get them to work either.
> 
> I have triend 
> folder-hook x-1 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
> folder-hook 50143 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
> folder-hook .x-1 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
> folder-hook ^{ 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"a

Sorry, I don't know about IMAP, but ...

> 
> I also tried:-
> folder-hook AFM 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
> to match a local folder called AFM but that didn't work either.

... this one should work. I just tested
folder-hook box ... 
to match =inbox. It works, so obviouly you only need to match a
substring of the foldername, which is the desired behavior since we're
talking about regexp. To be more specific a substring of the PATH.
folder-hook in ...
matches =inbox aswell as =mailinglists/MUTT
 ^^   ^^

Consequently
folder-hook me ...

matches every folder located somewhere under /home
^^

Therefore, to match folders in your $folder you should always use a '='
in front of the foldername.

> I am fairly familiar with REs.  However it's not clear (to me) from
> the mutt documetnation how the folder-hook REs are supposed to
> match should they match anywhere in the folder name or do they always
> start matching from the first character?  Also does one have to match
> the whole string?

s.a.

>From the manual:
3.5 Setting variables based upon mailbox 

Usage: folder-hook [!]regexp command
[snip]

and regexp being described as:
4.1 Regular Expressions 

All string patterns in Mutt including those in more complex patterns
must be specified using regular expressions (regexp) in the `POSIX
extended'' syntax (which is more or less the syntax used by egrep and
GNU awk).
[snip]

all tested with mutt-1.2 which shouldn't matter anyway.

Michael
-- 
It was kinda like stuffing the wrong card in a computer, when you're
stickin' those artificial stimulants in your arm.
-- Dion, noted computer scientist

PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65  40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13



Re: REs for folder-hook

2000-05-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> The question is how to match a remote IMAP folder name, the folder
> name will always start "{x-1.net:50143}" but whatever I try doesn't
> seem to work.  I have even tried matching some local folders but I
> can't get them to work either.
> 
> I have triend 
> folder-hook x-1 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
> folder-hook 50143 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
> folder-hook .x-1 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'

Someone already answered the rest of your email (I hope that helped),
I'll just comment that someone filed a bug-report with folder-hooks and
IMAP mailboxes awhile ago.  I don't have the email anymore so I can't
check, but it had something to do with the {} in the IMAP folder names
getting interpreted the wrong way, and consequently causing problems
for (read: making impossible to use) folder-hooks with IMAP folders.
Hopefully the issue is sorted out soon.  If it was a real issue --
just because there is a bug report doesn't mean there really is a bug,
I've seen plenty of cases where in the end the issue has been a
configuration or site-depended problem.  But your problems with the
hooks certainly would seem to indicate it's a real bug, that's not
impossible either.


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
This sentence does, in fact, not have the property it claims not to have.



Colors and regex matching

2000-05-15 Thread Bob Bell

Is it possible to match against a regex but not color the entire
regex?  This could be useful if I need to match against something
before my regex to ensure that I have a good match, but I don't want
to color that initial text.

-- 
Bob BellCompaq Computer Corporation
Software Engineer   110 Spit Brook Rd - ZKO3-3U/14
TruCluster GroupNashua, NH 03062-2698
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 603-884-0595



Re: What `resend-message' do?? (It's not in 1.2 manual)

2000-05-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Francisco D. Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
>  Shouldn't it REsend the edited message??? I'm sending one message to myself
>  (which I receive accordingly) but if I go the sent-mail folder and
>  ``resend-message'' I don't receive a new copy.

You should, if you actually sent the message.

>  What exactly does the `resend-message' function??

It will take the current message and start composing a new message using
that as a "template" -- your email will have the same headers and the
same body (and attachements) as that email.

Also note that there is no Fcc set for the email by default.  That could
be considered a bug, or a mis-feature at least...


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
If you don't care where you're going, you're never lost.



silly ass question - quoted mailname

2000-05-15 Thread Bob Waskosky

Why is my name quoted "Bob Waskosky" in the From: line of my sent emails? Any ideas 
how to get rid of the quotes?

I added MAILNAME='Bob Waskosky' in my .bash_profile but it still ends up quoted. See 
From: line above.

Thanks

-- 
**
Bob Waskosky   Homepage:  http://www.nobhead.com/perl/
USAemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**



Re: What `resend-message' do?? (It's not in 1.2 manual)

2000-05-15 Thread Francisco D. Borges

» Mikko Hänninen wrote:

> Francisco D. Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> >  Shouldn't it REsend the edited message??? I'm sending one message to myself
> >  (which I receive accordingly) but if I go the sent-mail folder and
> >  ``resend-message'' I don't receive a new copy.
> 
> You should, if you actually sent the message.

 the message was not sent, that I know for sure (I looked at the mail log's).

 The weird thing here is that after editing the message, I was delivered at the
 index of the folder where I was, not to the compose_mode of that message. 
 Is there some variable that might be causing this?

I already have:
set   abort_unmodified=no # Let me send empty messages
  
> >  What exactly does the `resend-message' function??
> 
> It will take the current message and start composing a new message using
> that as a "template" -- your email will have the same headers and the
> same body (and attachements) as that email.
> 
> Also note that there is no Fcc set for the email by default.  That could
> be considered a bug, or a mis-feature at least...

 Thank you for the info, now I just got to learn how to do it...

 cheers,
-- 
   Francisco.
   São Paulo, Brasil.
 __o
`\<,
 _(*)/(*)_



Re: What `resend-message' do?? (It's not in 1.2 manual)

2000-05-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Francisco D. Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
>  the message was not sent, that I know for sure (I looked at the mail log's).

Okay, I suppose that's pretty authoritative. :-)

>  The weird thing here is that after editing the message, I was delivered at the
>  index of the folder where I was, not to the compose_mode of that message. 
>  Is there some variable that might be causing this?

Hmmm.

It *sounds* like what's happening is that you're running the "edit"
function, which recalls the raw message into your editor (with every
header, you can tell easily if there are Received headers, although
if it's a Fcc message then there wouldn't be any), saves any changes
you make and replaces the original in the mailbox with your edited
message.  With this, you're not supposed to go to the compose menu
at all after you exit the editor.  Could that be it?

In case you wonder, the purpose of that function is so you can manually
make changes to the message in the mailbox.  For example, if there is a
header you want to change.  It goes without saying that you must "know
what you are doing" with this function.


resend-message and edit used to be the bizarrely the same function.
You could either choose to resend the message, or to write it back to
the folder with a special command.  With Mutt 1.2, the functions have
been separated and they both do their jobs much better.  Maybe you
have some strange keybindings left over from a pre-1.2 setup?


Hope this helps,
Mikko
PS. Your Mail-Followup-To header is a bit messed up in your emails...
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
If I could offer you only one tip for the future, sunscreen would be it.



Re: silly ass question - quoted mailname

2000-05-15 Thread Bob Waskosky

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 04:22:29PM -0500, Bob Waskosky wrote:
> Why is my name quoted "Bob Waskosky" in the From: line of my sent emails? Any ideas 
>how to get rid of the quotes?
> 
> I added MAILNAME='Bob Waskosky' in my .bash_profile but it still ends up quoted. See 
>From: line above.
> 
> Thanks

Nevermind. Did it with mutt instead of in the .bash_profile.

-- 
**
Bob Waskosky   Homepage:  http://www.nobhead.com/perl/
USAemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**



Re: Deleting IMAP folders - is it possible?

2000-05-15 Thread David T-G

Chris --

...and then Chris Green said...
% On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 07:19:44PM +0200, clemensF wrote:
% > 
% > if you enjoy the neccessary priviledges on the place hosting your
% > 
% Well I should do, the IMAP server is running as a user process, all
% the files are in my user area and all the files are owned and
% writeable by me.

Please forgive me for stating the obvious, but is the imapd running in
the user space actually running with your UID, and doess it expect to
be in the user space (or at least be happy) and not try to do some fancy
change-euid for file manipulation?


% 
% -- 
% Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
%   Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%   WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/


:-D
-- 
David T-G   * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001.  There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*


 PGP signature


Re: pkspxycwrap?

2000-05-15 Thread Alex Lane

* On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:46:23AM -0400, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> What is this and where does one find it? It's in the pgp6.rc file:
> 
> # fetch keys
> set pgp_getkeys_command="pkspxycwrap %r"
> 
> ... but it sure as tootin' ain't in MY distribution of pgp v6...and I get
> a "command not found" error every time I try to decrypt or verify a
> signature.
> 

The program is 'pkspxyc', a PKS 'smart' client that works with PKS proxy
servers. I believe a space is missing, and that 'wrap' stands alone.

Cheers...
-- 
Alex Lane * Seabrook, Texas, USA  -*-  [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.galexi.com/alex/
DH/DSS PGP keyID: 0xD94803CD  -*-  RSA PGP keyID: 0xCABD6FF9
No difference plus no difference plus no difference plus . . .
eventually equals a clear difference.   (The Fast Food Fallacy)



Re: What `resend-message' do?? (It's not in 1.2 manual)

2000-05-15 Thread clemensF

> Mikko Hänninen (Tue 16.0500-00:15):
> >  What exactly does the `resend-message' function??
> 
> It will take the current message and start composing a new message using
> that as a "template" -- your email will have the same headers and the
> same body (and attachements) as that email.

so this is the former (1.0.1)  function?

-- 
clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do  D4685B884894C483
gpg recv-key 0x9
echo `gpg list-key 0x9 | cat -tv` | \
gpg encrypt `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address` | \
mail -s your-key `gpg list-key 0x9 | 822address`



Re: REs for folder-hook

2000-05-15 Thread David T-G

Mikko, et al --

...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
% > The question is how to match a remote IMAP folder name, the folder
% > name will always start "{x-1.net:50143}" but whatever I try doesn't
% > 
% > folder-hook x-1 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
% > folder-hook 50143 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'
% > folder-hook .x-1 'set folder_format="%N  %F %f"'

I don't see why these wouldn't work, since they're the same format as my
brother ended up using (see below).  Then, again, it's late for me...


% 
% I'll just comment that someone filed a bug-report with folder-hooks and
% IMAP mailboxes awhile ago.  I don't have the email anymore so I can't
% check, but it had something to do with the {} in the IMAP folder names

I mentioned that, though not as a specific bug report.  {} are special
characters for a regex, and so you can't match on them (*that* perhaps
due to a bug, since it should be escapable *somehow*).  My brother found
this problem when trying out IMAP folders and folder-hooks, and he ended
up simply matching a sufficiently unique substring and going from there.


:-D
-- 
David T-G   * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001.  There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*


 PGP signature


2 IMAP questions again

2000-05-15 Thread Shao Zhang

Hi,
I set my one of my mailbox to: mailboxes = {127.0.0.1}mail/debian
and now when I involke mutt with -y option, I can view the
debian folder. But according to the doc, 1.12 supports browsing
mailboxes on an IMAP server, so how do I actually do this?

My second question is when I delete a mail accessing via IMAP,
it creates an annoying message, something like:

DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER
This text is part of the internal format of your mail folder,
and is not a real message.  It is created automatically by the mail system
software. If deleted, important folder data will be lost, and it will be
re-created with the data reset to initial values.

How can I avoid this?

Thanks again.

Shao.

-- 

Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1  ___ _   _
Department of Communications/ __| |_  __ _ ___  |_  / |_  __ _ _ _  __ _ 
University of New South Wales   \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \  / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` |
Sydney, Australia   |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, |
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |___/ 
_



Re: C-c C-c

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 11:36:38PM +0200, Stephane Payrard wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 06:23:58AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 11:32:57PM -0400, Jonathan Pennington wrote:
> > -> Again with the lost configs. I used to just type that sequence after
> > -> writing an email and emacs would save and exit, automagically
> > -> releasing control to Mutt. Unfortunately, now I have to explicitily
> > -> exit before continuing. Does anyone know what I want to adjust to
> > -> make the sequence C-c C-c (or any sequence for that matter) do this
> > -> automagically again? I know that this is really a .emacs question, but
> > -> I thought it was in post.el, so it's a Mutt specific .emacs question
> > -> :-)
> > 
> > Rather than firing up Emacs and exiting it every time you want to use it,
> > fire up Emacs once per login and shut it down when you log out. It means
> > access to files is much faster.
> > 
> > In Mutt, set your editor to emacsclient:
> > 
> > set editor="emacsclient"# editor to use when composing messages
> 
> You can also set the VISUAL or EDITOR variable that buy you the same
> feature (popping a emacs buffer to edit stuff) for many tools at once.
> 
> > 
> > and use C-x # to exit. You can do other tricks by building an elisp
> > function which would call "server-exit", the function C-X # calls. For
> > example, one of these days I will get around to writing a function like
> 
> you also need the following line in ~/.emacs to enable the server part
> at emacs startup:
> 
> (gnuserv-start)
> 
For vi lovers this can all be done in a similar way with xvile, I use
it all the time, the equivalent to 'emacslient' is 'vileget'.  It's
slightly cleverer than the above in fact, if vileget can't find a
running xvile it starts one up for you.

[x]vile is my vi clone of choice, it's actually based on an emacs
engine, has most of the goodies that emacs gives you but is close
enough to 'real' vi to present no problems when moving from vi to
xvile and back.  It also has perl scripting built into it if you want.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



Re: Mail-Followup-To description

2000-05-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Frank Derichsweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 
May 2000:
> Using  list-reply will produce a MFT header (iff followup_to is set)
> just before sending the mail. The MFT header is *NOT* shown in the
> mail editor.
> 
> Feature wish:
> IMHO it would be better to generate it in oder to be able to "see" it
> within the mail editor.

I think this is explained in the manual, but I'm not sure...  Anyway,
the reason why it's only added at sending time is so that Mutt doesn't
know before that whether you're sending the email to some mailing list
or not.  When Mutt is sending the mail, it looks if any of the addresses
are mailing lists -- if there are, it'll generate the MFT header
accordingly.  If you think about this for a moment you will see the
logic in this behaviour.

Mutt also won't of course generate a MFT header if one already exists
(is supplied by user).

I have been thinking that it would be useful to have a feature in Mutt
for "stamping" the email with a MFT header, based on the current
recipient list.  Ie. not have Mutt do this by default before sending,
but giving the user the option to automatically generate the MFT header
into the email with a manual (or macro-ed?) command.  In the rare cases
where I want to modify the MFT header, this would save some typing...


Regards,
Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
Funny off-topic messages are always on-topic.



Re: Still alive?

2000-05-15 Thread clemensF

> Mikko Hänninen (Mon 15.0500-00:40):
> clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 14 May 2000:
> > can this be done:  everyone may optionally supply a "backup" email-address
> > which unsubscribe notification are forwarded to, so one at least knows
> > what's happening?
> 
> Hmmm, Majordomo doesn't support something like that.  Sorry.

does anybody know of a list manager with this functionality?  this could
prove important for desparate people...

-- 
clemens  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Mail-Followup-To description

2000-05-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 12:29:02PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Frank Derichsweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 
>15 May 2000:
> > Using  list-reply will produce a MFT header (iff followup_to is set)
> > just before sending the mail. The MFT header is *NOT* shown in the
> > mail editor.
> > 
> > Feature wish:
> > IMHO it would be better to generate it in oder to be able to "see" it
> > within the mail editor.
> 
> I think this is explained in the manual, but I'm not sure...  
MFT is described in the manual, yes. But the other header modifications
(e.g. myhdr ) are displayed within the editor. Therefore I would like
to see a line. "Please note, that MFT header is generated after
editing the mail just before actually transmitting it via smtp".


> Anyway,
> the reason why it's only added at sending time is so that Mutt doesn't
> know before that whether you're sending the email to some mailing list
> or not.  

Using list-reply, mutt knows, that I am replying to the List,
therefore could add the MFT for that list.

> When Mutt is sending the mail, it looks if any of the addresses
> are mailing lists -- if there are, it'll generate the MFT header
> accordingly.  If you think about this for a moment you will see the
> logic in this behaviour.

Yes, I could use list-reply and add cc to another list ...

No problem with the mutt behaviour, just an idea to prevent somebody
else from spending too much time with trying to produce MFT headers ...



Maildir vs mbox (was Re: Maildir support in Procmail 3.14 -- how?)

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Gushue

Maildir is sounding more interesting to me all the time, with support for
it in procmail (can't remember if I knew about that before or not). How much
of a speed difference would there be between that and mbox? I'm currently
reading my mail on my 486 Linux box, and speed would be the main issue. I
guess Maildir would have other advantages as well...

The original reason I was using mbox was so that I could switch between
Eudora and some Linux client easily, but now that I have a dedicated Linux
box that's not a problem :)

-- 
Homer:  You can let him down gently, but over the next couple of
months, I want you to break it off.

Marge:  Um, okay, Homer.

Homer:  Whoof!  That was a close one, kids.

   Another Simpsons Clip Show



Re: 'browser' - what is it?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 08:57:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > In general I think I'd prefer the browser to *always* start from
> > $folder or, even better, from some user-definable directory.
> > 
> > I can get back to see my $spoolfile with 'c!', I can get back to a
> > mailbox in $folder with 'c= but there's no simple way to
> > get the browser back to starting from $folder again.
> 
> There is a rather uncomfortable way to achieve this. Type
> c?cPath/to/folder
> 
This may be all I need as I can wrap it up in a macro easily enough,
thanks.

Yes, a quick trial of browsing local folders, followed by my IMAP
folders, followed by my local folders seems to work OK.  The only
addition is that in some cases one needs to delete the initial prompt
from the second 'c' command.

Messy macros it may be but it will do what I want!

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



change-folder command and browser - thanks everybody for the help

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Green

I have finally got a macro that does what I want, takes the current
message and allows me to browse a remote IMAP system to save the
message.  This is mostly thanks to all the help and feedback I got
here over the past few weeks - I expect everyone got pretty bored with
all my questions and moans about the browser.

The macro I have which does what I want is:-
macro index ,s "s?c^U{x-1.net:50143}INBOX.^M"

For just reading/browsing the folders I have:-
macro index ,c "c?c^U{x-1.net:50143}INBOX^M"

It's not exactly neat or elegant but it gets the job done perfectly
well so I'm happy now.

Let me just explain why I'm doing this, I run mutt on four systems, work,
home, this Linux login account and another login account.  I wanted to
set up a place where I could save any 'important' messages so they're
viewable from any of my systems.  All four systems get quite a lot of mail
'locally' and most of it doesn't need to go to the IMAP server, it's just
the odd message, a few each day, that I want to put on the IMAP server.

I have set up Courier IMAP on this system as a user (I have no root
access) and now, with the above mutt macro, I can save mail to here
quite easily.  The browsing is necessary because I don't want to have
to remember what I've called all the mail folders.

So, once again, thanks everyone!

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/



Re: 'browser' - what is it?

2000-05-15 Thread Michael Tatge

Hi!

On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 05:23:47PM +0200, Stefan Bender wrote:
> Michael Tatge wrote on Sat, May 13 2000 16:51:34:
> > On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 11:43:52AM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 08:57:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > > > > In general I think I'd prefer the browser to *always* start from
> > > > > $folder...
> > > 
> > > > There is a rather uncomfortable way to achieve this. Type
> > > > c?cPath/to/folder
> > > 
> > > And this could be made a folder hook, couldn't it.
> 
> [...]
> > A very clumsy way to do it would be
> > macro index  c?c...[as often as
> > needed]/path/to/$folder\n
> 
> Can't you use ^u for this? Afaik it deletes the whole line at once.
> I looked it up, the function is called , defined in
> functions.h.
> So the macro would be
> 
> macro index  c?c^u/path/to/$folder
> or
> macro index  c?c/path/to/$folder
> (just tested :)

Ah, I new there was a function to do, but I couldn't remember. Nice. So
this one should work for the original poster.
 
Michael
-- 
If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.

PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65  40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13