On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 12:05 -0400, Jason Slagle wrote: > Different operating model than the ones I'm thinking of. Things like > zmanda as pointed out where the commercial version will get features or > other items not yet present in the community edition.
What Red Hat sells, and customers see value in, is stability: stability from extensive testing, stability from being very deliberate about updating etc. > Spacewalk was just born from satellite. The open source version lagged by > years. Huh ? When Satellite was open-sourced, Spacewalk _was_ the Satellite code base. Satellite should also serve as a warning to anybody thinking about doing something partially closed-source - for example, yum was a direct response to the fact that the server bits of up2date were closed source. up2date withered, yum is still around. David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
