Am 11.04.2014 um 11:56 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org>:
> 11/04/2014 11:23, Stephan Witt: >>> So do you mean that if I write in an English text "somme" instead >>> of "some", if will be considered an OK work because "somme" exists >>> in French? Is that supposed to be a feature? >> >> Indeed. Following is the debug output of text input while >> instant-spellchecking is enabled: >> >> AppleSpellChecker.cpp (95): spellCheck: "so" = OK, lang = en_US >> AppleSpellChecker.cpp (95): spellCheck: "som" = FAILED, lang = en_US >> Paragraph.cpp (4115): misspelled word: "som" [518..520] >> AppleSpellChecker.cpp (95): spellCheck: "somm" = FAILED, lang = >> en_US Paragraph.cpp (4115): misspelled word: "somm" [518..521] >> AppleSpellChecker.cpp (95): spellCheck: "somme" = OK, lang = en_US >> AppleSpellChecker.cpp (95): spellCheck: "somme " = OK, lang = en_US > > Is there a way to avoid this "feature"? I don't know. It's a black box. It's a OS service. Perhaps it can be configured somewhere, via System Preferences or API. With LyX you can use hunspell as the spell checker backend instead. Stephan
