2014-04-10 22:30 GMT+02:00 Stephan Witt: > Am 10.04.2014 um 20:43 schrieb Georg Baum: > > It is probably not difficult to implement sensible behaviour for > "ignore" > > and "ignore all" for these words: HunspellChecker has already a member > > variable ignored_ which tracks ignored words, so if words which created > an > > encoding error on spell checking would be kept in a different list as > well, > > then "ignore" and "ignore all" could simply add the affceted words to the > > ignored list. > > Like another personal word list, but not a persistent one. >
Yes, this sounds like a good idea. Jürgen
