Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > The point is that users cannot do something sensible with such marked > words (except for adding them into the personal dictionary).
It is probably not difficult to implement sensible behaviour for "ignore" and "ignore all" for these words: HunspellChecker has already a member variable ignored_ which tracks ignored words, so if words which created an encoding error on spell checking would be kept in a different list as well, then "ignore" and "ignore all" could simply add the affceted words to the ignored list. > Actually, I tend to convert all hunspell dictionaries to utf8. This seems > the only proper solution to this problem. Does this mean that we need to maintain our own versions? If not then it is probably the best solution, if yes then I'd rather not do it. Georg
