in reply to the The RTFM comments earlier.
This is not an excuse for any earlier comments and is not gender specific but
an example of something that I have noticed myself doing lately which seems
to relate to parts of this conversation thread.
People read / hear the same text but read what they want to read / hear it in
a way that is unique to them.
Take for example the Java API - there have been a couple of times
when reading this that I have come away with an idea that was incorrect
and later when I had this clarrified I found that it was becuase I was
assuming / reading into it that a command worked in a certain way.
Yet when it was explained in different words the meaning became crystal
clear!
Just something I've caught myself doing :).
-------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
issues mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
