>I'm sure the lack-of-confidence and second-guessing, if any goes on here, is specifically a 'woman thing', but I don't know about the hands-on >or intuitive thing--I think that might be just me. Anybody have any ideas on that? >psyche I think that it's not necessarily a 'woman thing' I'm quite sure (even tho I'm new) that there are men out there who are newbies to linux and haven't the foggiest about what goes on or how to use it... I remember when I first started... until someone told me about man (mainly for CS programming) I'd never have thought a way out of it. Also, it's better to not have to go to a library and get a book everytime you need something clarified - so I agree with the hands-on thing. DarkMaidn _______________________________________________ issues mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
- [issues] reading man pag... Jenny Brown (was Gable)
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopol... James A. Sutherland
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolizat... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopol... Andrew Plumb
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization psyche
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Rebecca J. Walter
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Melanie Draper
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization BiOFH
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization A Kozic
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization J B
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Hooker-Myers, Mary
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization J B
- Fwd: Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Sally Britnell
- Fwd: Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Sally Britnell
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization J B
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Terri Oda
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Molly Tomlinson