gcc  

Messages by Thread

• Why does sscanf fail to scan "" ? Bug? U.Mutlu
  • Re: Why does sscanf fail to scan "" ? Bug? Errol Millios via Gcc
  • Re: Why does sscanf fail to scan "" ? Bug? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240714 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [no subject] Cliff Gresham via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240713 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Question about enabling additional flags in Ofast Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about enabling additional flags in Ofast Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• Re: Sourceware mitigating and preventing the next xz-backdoor Trenton Davison via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240712 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GCC 11.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 11.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Iain Sandoe
  • Re: GCC 11.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org William Seurer via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 11.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
• g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
  • Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
  • RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240711 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Nonbootstrap build with Apple clang broken in gm2 FX Coudert via Gcc
  • Re: Nonbootstrap build with Apple clang broken in gm2 Gaius Mulley via Gcc
  • Re: Nonbootstrap build with Apple clang broken in gm2 FX Coudert via Gcc
  • Re: Nonbootstrap build with Apple clang broken in gm2 Gaius Mulley via Gcc
  • Re: Nonbootstrap build with Apple clang broken in gm2 FX Coudert via Gcc
  • Re: Nonbootstrap build with Apple clang broken in gm2 Gaius Mulley via Gcc
• Re: Apply function attributes (e.g., [[gnu::access()]]) to pointees too Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: Apply function attributes (e.g., [[gnu::access()]]) to pointees too David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: Apply function attributes (e.g., [[gnu::access()]]) to pointees too Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: Apply function attributes (e.g., [[gnu::access()]]) to pointees too Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• insn attributes: Support blocks of C-code? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: insn attributes: Support blocks of C-code? Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: insn attributes: Support blocks of C-code? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: insn attributes: Support blocks of C-code? Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: insn attributes: Support blocks of C-code? Georg-Johann Lay
• GCC 14.1.1 Status Report (2024-07-11) Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 14.1.1 Status Report (2024-07-11) LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 14.1.1 Status Report (2024-07-11) Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• Help with vector cost model Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Help with vector cost model Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: Help with vector cost model Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Help with vector cost model Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Help with vector cost model Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240710 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• CFP deadline for Toolchains Track @ LPC 2024 extended Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
• md: define_code_attr / define_mode_attr: Default value? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: md: define_code_attr / define_mode_attr: Default value? Richard Sandiford via Gcc
• How to implement Native TLS for a specific platform? Julian Waters via Gcc
  • Re: How to implement Native TLS for a specific platform? Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu via Gcc
  • Re: How to implement Native TLS for a specific platform? Julian Waters via Gcc
  • Re: How to implement Native TLS for a specific platform? Julian Waters via Gcc
  • Re: How to implement Native TLS for a specific platform? Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu via Gcc
  • Re: How to implement Native TLS for a specific platform? Julian Waters via Gcc
  • Re: How to implement Native TLS for a specific platform? Julian Waters via Gcc
• P Linda Becker via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240707 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240706 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240705 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Emanuele Torre via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • [[gnu::null_terminated_string_arg(1)]] on strtol(1) (was: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like) functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions LIU Hao via Gcc
  • [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • RE: [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Daniel Plakosh
  • Re: [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • RE: [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Daniel Plakosh
  • WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Paul Eggert
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Paul Eggert
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Paul Eggert
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier G. Branden Robinson via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Paul Eggert
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• GCC Download Issue Dinesh M via Gcc
  • Re: GCC Download Issue Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240704 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• DW_TAG_compile_unit's references to .debug_line and .loc directive extension Fangrui Song
  • Re: DW_TAG_compile_unit's references to .debug_line and .loc directive extension Fangrui Song
• Ccccc. C. C. Susan Difraia via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240703 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gmplib.org Down Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Sid Maxwell via Gcc
  • Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Sid Maxwell via Gcc
• Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Florian Weimer
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240630 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• FUCK YOU WG21 FOR THIS import std; BS THAT BREAKS MY LIBRARY. FUCK YOU FUCK YOU unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc
  • unwanted communication Mark Wielaard
• gcc-14-20240629 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Dry Ft Bob Lange
• gas or as generates large bins Houssem H1 via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240628 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Please help MR DEEPAK via Gcc
  • Re: Please help Mohd Kashif via Gcc
• About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Basile Starynkevitch
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Iain Sandoe
• gcc-12-20240627 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
• gcc-11-20240626 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Richard Biener via Gcc
  • IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
• [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Gerald Pfeifer

• Earlier messages
• Later messages