gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240630 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• FUCK YOU WG21 FOR THIS import std; BS THAT BREAKS MY LIBRARY. FUCK YOU FUCK YOU unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc
  • unwanted communication Mark Wielaard
• gcc-14-20240629 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Dry Ft Bob Lange
• gas or as generates large bins Houssem H1 via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240628 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Please help MR DEEPAK via Gcc
  • Re: Please help Mohd Kashif via Gcc
• About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Basile Starynkevitch
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Iain Sandoe
• gcc-12-20240627 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
• gcc-11-20240626 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Richard Biener via Gcc
  • IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
• [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain on 2024-06-27 at 11am EST5EDT. Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
• Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240623 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [no subject] Ernesto via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240622 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc 12.4 release archive? Liviu Ionescu
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Liviu Ionescu
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240621 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword David Malcolm via Gcc
• pb_ds gp_hash_table resize strategy CH HC via Gcc
  • Re: pb_ds gp_hash_table resize strategy Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240620 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GCC 11.4.1 Status Report (2024-06-20) Richard Biener via Gcc
• GCC 12.4.1 Status Report (2024-06-20) Richard Biener via Gcc
• GCC 12.4 Released Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240619 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Union initialization semantics Alexander Monakov
  • Re: Union initialization semantics Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Union initialization semantics Martin Uecker via Gcc
• Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240616 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240615 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Ryan Libby via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Ryan Libby via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Martin Uecker via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240614 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: Minor correction Gerald Pfeifer
• gcc-12-20240613 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org William Seurer via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Iain Sandoe via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
  • Re: “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
  • Re: “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
  • Re: “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240612 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mark Wielaard
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• How to represent a fallthrough condtion (with no else) in "Match and Simplify"? Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: How to represent a fallthrough condtion (with no else) in "Match and Simplify"? Richard Biener via Gcc
• Hosting a Mirror Site Ganesh Ram via Gcc
  • Re: Hosting a Mirror Site Ganesh Ram via Gcc
• Gifting This Piano Out. Mary Grieshop via Gcc
• Кавайное меню J’PAN х Sweet Lavka и подарки 🎁 J'PAN via Gcc
• [Committed] IBM Z: Fix ICE in expand_perm_as_replicate Andreas Krebbel via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240609 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240608 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• ਪੀਜੀਐਨਪੀ Labbu Singh via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240607 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240606 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Mikael Pettersson via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Dimitar Dimitrov
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Mikael Pettersson via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Mikael Pettersson via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Georg-Johann Lay
• libgcov on a standalone platform embedded controller Christopher Campbell via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240605 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Which GCC version start to support RISC-V RVV1.0 黃國鎭
  • Re: Which GCC version start to support RISC-V RVV1.0 Jeff Law via Gcc
• What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? FX Coudert via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Andi Kleen via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? FX Coudert via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? David Edelsohn via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? FX Coudert via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Andreas Schwab via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Iain Sandoe via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System via Gcc
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System via Gcc
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System
• Order for springs Harry Russell via Gcc
• Летнее фестивальное меню J'PAN via Gcc
• Partial vector Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
  • Re: Partial vector Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Partial vector Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• Epiphany target Andreas Olofsson via Gcc
  • Re: Epiphany target Jeff Law via Gcc
• Attribute with identifiers arguments דידי אפשטיין via Gcc
• GCC trouble in dump_printf_loc weizhe wang via Gcc
  • Re: GCC trouble in dump_printf_loc Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 😎☀️ Теперь на чилле, на расслабоне KOOK via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages