On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:57:19AM +0100, Toon Moene wrote: > Compare a standard gcc build: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837664.html > > with this one using checking=all: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837708.html > > Other languages do not seem to be affected. > > A sample: > > FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: > Segmentation fault) > FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C module-cmi xstd (gcm.cache/xstd.gcm) > FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C -std=c++2a (internal compiler error: > Segmentation fault) > FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C module-cmi xstd (gcm.cache/xstd.gcm) > > Hope this is useful. > > Kind regards, > > -- > Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 > Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands >
Thanks, I've reduced the issue with the modules testcases and created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118807 for this. Nathaniel
