On Thu, 27 Feb 2025, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: > Can you please confirm if we should add a version of this operator that > need not be diagnosed under pedantic mode? If so, I'll propose this
I'm doubtful of the need for a second variant, but in any case the starting point should be a patch that implements the standard name and semantics (and then if an extension is needed, it might go on top of that, whether in the same patch or a separate patch). -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
