debian-vote  

Messages by Date

• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Michael Banck
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot MJ Ray
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Andreas Barth
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot MJ Ray
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint Michael Banck
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot MJ Ray
• 2004/03/08 Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot MJ Ray
• 2004/03/08 Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Michael Banck
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Gerfried Fuchs
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Michael Banck
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot MJ Ray
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal MJ Ray
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Gerfried Fuchs
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: Proposal: Keep non-free Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal MJ Ray
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/08 Re: My testimonial about skuper viakgra manual disjointed bornagain
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Michael Banck
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Andreas Barth
• 2004/03/08 Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint Wichert Akkerman
• 2004/03/08 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Gerfried Fuchs
• 2004/03/08 Re: still more questions for the candidates Gergely Nagy
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Jason Gunthorpe
• 2004/03/08 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/08 Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/07 Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Shaun Jackman
• 2004/03/07 Why Anthony Towns is wrong Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Anand Kumria
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: Acknowledgement for your vote Peter Palfrader
• 2004/03/07 Re: Acknowledgement for your vote Anand Kumria
• 2004/03/07 Acknowledgement for your vote secretary
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/03/07 First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section Debian Project Secretary
• 2004/03/07 Re: Proposal: Keep non-free Eduard Bloch
• 2004/03/07 still more questions for the candidates Stephen Stafford
• 2004/03/07 Re: Proposal: Keep non-free MJ Ray
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal MJ Ray
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Michael Banck
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Michael Banck
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Jaldhar H. Vyas
• 2004/03/07 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Jaldhar H. Vyas
• 2004/03/07 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Jaldhar H. Vyas
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/07 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/03/07 Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint Michael Banck
• 2004/03/07 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/03/07 Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint Markus
• 2004/03/07 Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint Joey Hess
• 2004/03/07 Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint Raul Miller
• 2004/03/07 drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint Markus
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/07 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/07 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Michael Banck
• 2004/03/07 Re: Re: Message help
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/03/07 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/07 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/07 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/03/07 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/03/07 Advil not strong enough? Alva Kauffman
• 2004/03/07 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/03/07 My testimonial about skuper viakgra manual disjointed Big.bad.wolf
• 2004/03/07 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/03/07 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Craig Sanders
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates David B Harris
• 2004/03/06 Re: Proposal: Keep non-free Eduard Bloch
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates David Weinehall
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Andrew Suffield
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Raul Miller
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Raul Miller
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Josip Rodin
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Andrew Suffield
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Peter Samuelson
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Michael Banck
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/06 Re: Re: Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates simon raven
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Ben Burton
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/06 Re: Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Michael Banck
• 2004/03/06 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Michael Banck
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Michael Banck
• 2004/03/06 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Andreas Barth
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Peter Samuelson
• 2004/03/06 Re: Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates simon raven
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Andrew Suffield
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Peter Samuelson
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Pascal Hakim
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Andrew Suffield
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Andrew Suffield
• 2004/03/06 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Andrew Suffield
• 2004/03/06 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Sven Luther
• 2004/03/05 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/05 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/05 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther
• 2004/03/05 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/05 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/05 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Hamish Moffatt
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Raul Miller
• 2004/03/05 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Raul Miller
• 2004/03/05 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Raul Miller
• 2004/03/05 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Steve Langasek
• 2004/03/05 Re: tb's questions for the candidates Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/05 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Anthony Towns
• 2004/03/05 Re: Re: Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates simon
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates David Nusinow
• 2004/03/05 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot David Schleef
• 2004/03/05 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: "keep non-free" proposal Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Andrew Suffield
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 AutoResponse - Email Returned SAXK (KMM44554413V37804L0KM) PayPal Customer Service 2
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Ben Burton
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Ben Burton
• 2004/03/05 Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates Manoj Srivastava
• 2004/03/05 Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot Sven Luther

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]