On 2004-03-08 12:28:15 +0000 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yeah, they care only about licencing, and conflictive relationship
with
upstream, not about
Just looking at very recent past, debian-legal contributors have had
constructive discussions with people from the JasPer, Mozilla and
Cryptlib projects and the Text Encoding Initiative. We've had poor
exchanges with X-Oz and XFree86, but that's not entirely one-sided. A
discussion with FSF is continuing with little way to judge the
development at preset, but other discussions (not about FDL) are still
pleasant and productive.
And i am sure with all the time lost in this thread, at least one
non-free software could have been fully reimplemented from scratch in
a
free way, don't you think ?
Probably, but I type fast, so my emails don't lose much time. You
challenge every single post, often with errors and wild assertions.
Look at the start of this exchange: I pointed out that elfutils was
removed from main, not non-free. Very short and there was no error in
it. You replied with some bizarre (and incorrect AFAICT) statement
about elfutils being in non-free and added random accusations about
that showing how nobody cares enough about removing non-free. If you
want people to stop correcting and challenging you, stop posting so
many obvious errors and unjustified claims.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
