Messages by Date
-
2004/03/09
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Manoj Srivastava
-
2004/03/09
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Manoj Srivastava
-
2004/03/09
Re: still more questions for the candidates
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/09
im a 10.000.000th visitor to this website
REGINAALSIP
-
2004/03/09
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Matthias Urlichs
-
2004/03/09
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Adam Majer
-
2004/03/09
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Adam Majer
-
2004/03/09
Re: still more questions for the candidates
Anthony Towns
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/09
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/09
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Kevin Rosenberg
-
2004/03/09
Re: still more questions for the candidates
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/09
Re: still more questions for the candidates
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/09
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Craig Sanders
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/09
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/09
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Markus
-
2004/03/09
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/09
Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help
Michael Banck
-
2004/03/09
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Nathanael Nerode
-
2004/03/09
Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: Proposal: Keep non-free
Martin Schulze
-
2004/03/09
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Andrew Suffield
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: Proposal: Keep non-free
Andrew Suffield
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: still more questions for the candidates
Andrew Suffield
-
2004/03/09
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Matthias Urlichs
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/09
Blocked Message
guinn
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Eduard Bloch
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Markus
-
2004/03/09
Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help
Kevin Rosenberg
-
2004/03/09
Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help
Michael Banck
-
2004/03/09
Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help
Michael Banck
-
2004/03/09
Re: still more questions for the candidates
Anthony Towns
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Markus
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/09
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Michael Banck
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/09
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Gerfried Fuchs
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Martin Schulze
-
2004/03/09
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: still more questions for the candidates
Andreas Barth
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/09
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Martin Schulze
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Martin Schulze
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: still more questions for the candidates
Anthony Towns
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Peter van Rossum
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Jason Gunthorpe
-
2004/03/08
Re: still more questions for the candidates
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Anthony Towns
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: Questions to candidates
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Anthony Towns
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Anthony Towns
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Manoj Srivastava
-
2004/03/08
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Manoj Srivastava
-
2004/03/08
Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Manoj Srivastava
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates
Branden Robinson
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Anthony Towns
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Anthony Towns
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Craig Sanders
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Chris Lawrence
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Pawel Wiecek
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Craig Sanders
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Sam Hartman
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Eduard Bloch
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Michael Banck
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Steve Langasek
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Zenaan Harkness
-
2004/03/08
dishonesty
Bernhard R. Link
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Zenaan Harkness
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Zenaan Harkness
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Andreas Barth
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Markus
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Graham Wilson
-
2004/03/08
Nonsensical "arguments" (was: Why Anthony Towns is wrong)
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Questions to the candidates
Gustavo Noronha Silva
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Gustavo Noronha Silva
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Raul Miller
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Markus
-
2004/03/08
Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Gustavo Noronha Silva
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
David Weinehall
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Michael Banck
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Michael Banck
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Andreas Barth
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Anthony Towns
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Gerfried Fuchs
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/08
Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
Sven Luther
-
2004/03/08
Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
MJ Ray
-
2004/03/08
Re: drop or keep non-free - from users viewpoint
Sven Luther
[Earlier messages] [Later messages]