On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:08:33PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, as you all know i have upto now be mostly a proponent of the keep > > non-free camp, because, altough i fully would prefer every software in > > debian to be free, i feel that this is not really yet the time for it. > Ah, so there is a time for it? Can you please explain what that time > will be? (Either with a date, or a clear list of conditions.)
When no maintainers feel a need to provide and maintain non-free software. > I hope that the answer isn't "when there is nothing in non-free > anyhow". The problem we're trying to solve is that people require non-free software; if you've already given up on ever achieving that, that's a bit sad. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
