On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 08:39:22AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > The plural of "anecdote" is not "data". > > > > Yes, very clever. And also very silly. When collated in large > > numbers, anecdotes _do_ become data -- ask any psychologist or > > sociologist. > > No, I refuse to accept this. Psychology and sociology are fuzzy > "sciences" for the most part, where very little is proven. That does > not mean that the standards for proof should be lowered, it means that > their conclusions should be treated with the usual skepticism and not > as things which have been conclusively proven. >
Do you have any data to prove this, or is this just a wild hypothesis? Pasc -- Pascal Hakim +61 4 0341 1672
