On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:44:48PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:12:15PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > What i object to is that somehow the non-free removal proponent expect > > me to set it up, and no, i don't have time for it. > > You were repeatedly told that this is not expected of you. If you failed > to notice that, I am glad to reiterate this for you now.
Well, show me the non-free.org infrastructure then. I have seen nothing such, and if the vote pass, i will have nowhere to upload my non-free packages, so altough many people have said that it is not up to me, the fact have proved the contrary. Also, i have some misgivings about the long term goals and the oportunity of having a non-free.org archive setup. I do believe that in order to achieve a short time victory, the non-free removal candidates are potentially setting us up for a long term drawback in our goal to achieve a fully free plateform, including all the vertical infrastructure, the kernel, the OS, the apps, but also the bios or firmware below, the hardware drivers and the actual hardware. Friendly, Sven Luther
