Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you actively take on some responsibility and then fail to actually > fulfill that responsibility it and/or fail to tell others that somebody > else needs to do the job, that _is_ to "actively work against these rules > and decisions" in my book.
No. That would be to *passively* obstruct the rules, and such passive obstruction is allowed. For this reason the project needs to have things like an NMU procedure and a QA team to carry the slack when someone is inactive.
