On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:52:38AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The response is easy: it won't have our name on it anymore, and we > > > won't be devoting our resources to its support. > > > > Which ressources ? Assuredly not the small time the ftp-masters pass on > > it ? Assuredly not the minimal bandwidth requirement ? > > You asked how the proposal would change anything. I described two > changes it would make, which are of cardinal importance to me. > > The former, incidentally, is perhaps the most important, since it has > already confused you in this very thread, having already said that you > "would prefer every software in debian to be free", implying that it > isn't already. > > The compromise was that we have non-free stuff in the infrastructure, > but it is not part of the official distribution. That has clearly > broken down, since you are already confused about it.
Yeah, failing arguments, you play with words, how usual of this thread. You and i both perfectly know what we mean, so this is not a problem. And more to the point, do you really think moving the non-free stuff out of the debian archive and onto a separate archive would be something more than a fiction to make you non-free removal advocate happy ? Do you really believe that the same people confunding debian/main with debian/non-free are not the same one who think that apt-get.org is part of debian also ? Friendly, Sven Luther
