debian-policy  

Messages by Thread

• • Bug#162812: [PROPOSAL] Apps/Science menu section Josip Rodin
  • Bug#162812: [PROPOSAL] Apps/Science menu section Aaron M. Ucko
  • Bug#162812: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 14/10/2002] Apps/Science menu section) Debian Bug Tracking System
• (ad)Strong WebRobot/eMailId Collector: Free Download ! herald
• Essentialness of awk Santiago Vila
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Junichi Uekawa
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Santiago Vila
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Junichi Uekawa
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Santiago Vila
  • /bin/sh alternative (was Re: Essentialness of awk) Chris Waters
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Anthony Towns
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Joey Hess
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Anthony Towns
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Anthony Towns
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Santiago Vila
  • Re: Essentialness of awk Anthony Towns
• 未承諾広告※無料プレゼント お金貸します
• Using the Debian Logo Bob
  • Re: Using the Debian Logo J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
• Work shoes EN345 S3 S1 wang lan
• Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell BSG
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Peter Palfrader
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
  • Processed: Re: Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Anthony Towns
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Anthony Towns
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Anthony Towns
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Anthony Towns
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Branden Robinson
  • Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
• [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Joey Hess
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Joey Hess
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Joey Hess
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Andreas Schuldei
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Andreas Schuldei
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Joey Hess
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
• http://Worldsat.rtfm.be Worldsat Team
  • http://Worldsat.rtfm.be Worldsat Team
• Bug#39830: please clarify Zack Weinberg
• Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Clint Adams
  • Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Herbert Xu
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Georg Lehner
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Julian Gilbey
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Clint Adams
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Georg Lehner
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Junichi Uekawa
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Julian Gilbey
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Julian Gilbey
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Brendan O'Dea
  • Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Chris Waters
  • Bug#161455: marked as done (debian-policy: reference to ash outdated) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Re: what to put in Maintainer fields [was Re: Accepted po-debconf 0.2.2 (all source)] Clint Adams
• Whats up ! getrealiwith34
• 1,5 million actual German email adresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] Informationsgesellschaft mbH Berlin
• Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Jorge . Lehner
  • Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Jorge . Lehner
  • Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Adrian von Bidder
  • Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Georg Lehner
• Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Anthony Towns
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Anthony Towns
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Anthony Towns
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Anthony Towns
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
• Bug#160914: upgrading-checklist: no section numbers for 3.5.7.0 Marcin Owsiany
  • Bug#160914: marked as done (upgrading-checklist: no section numbers for 3.5.7.0) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#160908: debian-policy: Stray plus character in text Matt Zimmerman
  • Bug#160908: marked as done (debian-policy: Stray plus character in text) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#160839: debian-policy: Typo in debconf specification herbert
  • Bug#160839: marked as done (debian-policy: Typo in debconf specification) Debian Bug Tracking System
• on the usr/doc symlink Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
  • Re: on the usr/doc symlink Martin Michlmayr
  • Re: on the usr/doc symlink Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• Bug#160776: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] debconf spec updates to conform with reality Joey Hess
  • Bug#160776: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] debconf spec updates to conform with reality Carl R. Witty
  • Bug#160776: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] debconf spec updates to conform with reality Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#160776: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] debconf spec updates to conform with reality Anthony Towns
  • Bug#160776: marked as done (debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] debconf spec updates to conform with reality) Debian Bug Tracking System
• EARLY PROPOSAL Apache (and webapp?) policy Ola Lundqvist
  • Re: EARLY PROPOSAL Apache (and webapp?) policy Matthew Palmer
  • Re: EARLY PROPOSAL Apache (and webapp?) policy Ola Lundqvist
• build-arch and autobuilders ? Yann Dirson
  • Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Julian Gilbey
  • Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Yann Dirson
  • Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Santiago Vila
  • Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Julian Gilbey
  • Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Yann Dirson
• Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Bill Allombert
  • Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  • Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Robert Bihlmeyer
  • Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Oliver Elphick
  • Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Chris Waters
  • Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Oliver Elphick
  • Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Chris Waters
  • Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• CVS srivasta: Document recent changes debian-policy
• CVS srivasta: Update update-rc.d examples. Mention that one may need to remove and debian-policy
• CVS srivasta: Replace postinst by postrm debian-policy
• Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Andrew Suffield
  • Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Anthony Towns
  • Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Andrew Suffield
  • Re: Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#160248: marked as done (section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#159114: acknowledged by developer (Patents can't cover software in .nl after all) Adrian Bunk
  • Processed: Re: Bug#159114 acknowledged by developer (Patents can't cover software in .nl after all) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Re: Bug#159114: acknowledged by developer (Patents can't cover software in .nl after all) Manoj Srivastava
• Processed: Managing reports. Debian Bug Tracking System
• Reviewing policy bugs Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: Reviewing policy bugs Joey Hess
  • Re: Reviewing policy bugs Radovan Garabik
• Bug#159114: Are software patents legal in .nl? Manoj Srivastava
• CVS srivasta: Added dict server debian-policy
• [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Chris Waters
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Anthony Towns
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Ben Finney
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Joey Hess
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Branden Robinson
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Chris Waters
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Anthony Towns
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Andreas Schuldei
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Chris Lawrence
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Anthony Towns
  • Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Herbert Xu
• Bug#122996 dict-client and dict-server virtual package name Bob Hilliard
  • Re: Bug#122996 dict-client and dict-server virtual package name Manoj Srivastava
• Bug#159744: reassigning back... Yann Dirson
  • Processed: reassigning back... Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Re: Processed: reassigning back... Wichert Akkerman
  • Processed: Re: Processed: reassigning back... Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Re: Processed: reassigning back... Manoj Srivastava
• Bug#159744: marked as done (dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#159744: marked as done (dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#159642: dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: Re: Bug#159642: dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#159642: Processed: Re: Bug#159642: dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields Manoj Srivastava
  • Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#159642: dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: bugs assigned to the wrong package Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#128681: Processed: bugs assigned to the wrong package Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#128681: Processed: bugs assigned to the wrong package Josip Rodin
• Re: task-spanish exists: expansion proposal (was Re: Where are tasks now and how are they handled? (Woody sucks because there is no Task: Spanish)) Manoj Srivastava
• Where are tasks now and how are they handled? Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
  • Re: Where are tasks now and how are they handled? Joey Hess
• Policy changelog Indra Kusuma
  • Re: Policy changelog Martin Michlmayr
  • Re: Policy changelog Indra Kusuma
• Bug#127809: dpkg doesn't know about Enhances: - yes it does Matthew Palmer
  • Bug#127809: dpkg doesn't know about Enhances: - yes it does Wichert Akkerman
  • Bug#127809: dpkg doesn't know about Enhances: - yes it does Matthew Palmer
  • Bug#127809: dpkg doesn't know about Enhances: - yes it does Wichert Akkerman
  • Bug#127809: dpkg doesn't know about Enhances: - yes it does Matthew Palmer
  • Re: Bug#127809: dpkg doesn't know about Enhances: - yes it does Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#127809: marked as done (dpkg doesn't know about Enhances) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#159114: debian-policy: non-us server is located in a country where it's possible to patent algorithms Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#159114: debian-policy: non-us server is located in a country where it's possible to patent algorithms Manoj Srivastava
  • Bug#159114: marked as done (debian-policy: non-us server is located in a country where it's possible to patent algorithms) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#159114: marked as done (debian-policy: non-us server is located in a country where it's possible to patent algorithms) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#159046: debian-policy: Request new virtual package: cl-sql-backend Kevin M. Rosenberg
  • Bug#159046: marked as done (debian-policy: Request new virtual package: cl-sql-backend) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#76868: marked as done ([PENDING AMENDMENT 2001-02-27] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#58355: marked as done ([SEE 76868] postinst's should not start deactivated servers) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#20373: marked as done ([SEE 76868] start-stop-service) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#71621: acknowledged by developer (Bug#112828: fixed in debian-policy 3.5.7.0) Colin Watson
• Bug#81852: marked as done ([PENDING AMENDMENT 07/02/2001] Allowing crypto in the main archive) Debian Bug Tracking System

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]