On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 07:20:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I dislike the rc.d anywhere in the name on general aestetic principles,
> but Chris's arguments about the update- prefix are persuasive to me. I'd
> much rather see the "rc.d" name dropped where possible for "init", so
> we'd have invoke-init, update-init and so on.
I confess that I like "update-init" better myself, but I have to ask:
is the transition worth it? I have a fairly modest installation here
(recently rebuilt after a HD crash), and I see this:
~ $ grep update-rc.d /var/lib/dpkg/info/*{pre,post}{inst,rm}|wc -l
88
Which suggests that there's somewhere between 20 and 44 packages using
update-rc.d right now. Enough to justify a transition plan at the
very least. Enough that I'm questioning (though not formally
objecting to) this change.
--
Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
