reassign 159744 debian-policy thanks Folks, please get a consensus and stop this stupid reassigning and closing/reopening. The bug was cloned and one of the clones is assigned to dpkg-dev already, so reassigning this one does not make sense at all.
Policy still documents a relation that is not ready for use yet and has never been announced as such by the people implementing it (ie the dpkg developers). If you decide that you want people to use a half implemented feature that might change behaviour again, feel free to close this bugreport and forget about it. I'll happily reassign bugreports about people running into problems with Enhances back to debian-policy later in that case. If you decide to remove references to Enhances from debian-policy, great. It means people won't be tempted to use something that isn't quite ready for general use yet. But at least make a decision and stick with it instead of this silly reassigning/opening/closing. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wiggy.net/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
