Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2002 01:02:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#127809: dpkg doesn't know about Enhances: - yes it does
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2002 19:21:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 04 13:21:17 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk)
[195.92.249.252] (exim)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16MZu1-0007MS-00; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 13:21:17 -0600
Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5)
id 16MZu0-0002Ha-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 19:21:16 +0000
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:21:16 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dpkg-source doesn't know about Enhances
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.9.18
Severity: normal
Policy 3.5.6.0 section 7.2 describes the Enhances: field. However,
when I attempt to use it, I get:
dpkg-source: warning: unknown information field Enhances in input data
in package's section of control info file
Please remove this warning as it will discourage people from using
Enhances. The field is properly propagated into the package, so it does
not affect the ability of other tools to take advantage of this header.
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 127809-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2002 06:05:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 05 01:05:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcp559992pcs.rthfrd01.tn.comcast.net
(glaurung.green-gryphon.com) [68.52.105.148] (srivasta)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17mplr-0003ps-00; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 01:05:39 -0500
Received: from glaurung.green-gryphon.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-2) with ESMTP id
g8562A0a021625;
Thu, 5 Sep 2002 01:02:10 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-2) id
g85629rt021620;
Thu, 5 Sep 2002 01:02:09 -0500
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I)
To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#127809: dpkg doesn't know about Enhances: - yes it does
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) (i386-debian-linux-gnu)
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
Organization: The Debian Project
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Time: Thu Sep 5 01:02:09 2002
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 01:02:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Matthew
Palmer's message of "Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:52:29 +1000 (EST)")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 31
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I don't see why this is a bug at all, whether in dpkg or in
policy. As wichert mentioned in another thread, dpkg is more than a
mere implementation of policy. And policy is more than a mere
documentation for dpkg and apt.
Policy mentions enhances as a means of declaring a dependency
relationship. It does not say that it shall be paid any attention to
by dpkg, apt, and friends.
In time, support for this field shall come in the tools. In
the meanwhile, the field functions well enough to let humans know
that some package enhances the functionality of some other package. I
fail to see how that can be considered negative.
There are packages that are using this field, and I would not
remove the field from policy where there is, in my opinion, no
need.
I am hereby closing this report.
manoj
--
In my opinion, Perl's biggest weaknesses are (1) its syntax is
fantastically complex (consider the multiple meanings of / and $),
and it is a collection of features more than a coherent language for
expressing algorithms. Dale Worley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
