BTW:
El jue, 19-09-2002 a las 01:28, Clint Adams escribió:
...
> You may wish to restrict your script to POSIX features when possible
> so that it may use `/bin/sh' as its interpreter. If your script works
> with `ash', it's probably POSIX compliant, but if you are in doubt,
> use `/bin/bash'.
>
...
/bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash. Shouldn't it be an alternative so I
can make ash or any other compliant, but smaller shall the default (and
thus save memory and CPU requirements)?!
Best Regards,
Jorge-León
