debian-policy  

Messages by Date

• 2001/08/31 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/08/31 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Santiago Vila
• 2001/08/31 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Steve Greenland
• 2001/08/31 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Santiago Vila
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Daniel Burrows
• 2001/08/30 Bug#110711: Incorrect references to 'package-developer' jnw
• 2001/08/30 Bug#110713: java-compiler and java-virtual-machine missing from virtual-package-names-list.text.gz jnw
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Andrew McMillan
• 2001/08/30 Bug#110705: typo error in upgrading-checklist Carlos Valdivia Yagüe
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Jim Penny
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Ari Makela
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Santiago Vila
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Steve Greenland
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Ari Makela
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Roland Mas
• 2001/08/30 Request For Information josh . winters
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Ari Makela
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Jonathan D. Proulx
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
• 2001/08/30 Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Jonathan D. Proulx
• 2001/08/30 Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Ari Makela
• 2001/08/29 Seconded (was: Where to place web-accessible images) Roland Mas
• 2001/08/28 Bug#110446: typo error in virtual-package-names-list.txt Carlos Valdivia Yagüe
• 2001/08/27 Processed: I'll take these, since they're both perfectly valid bugs Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/27 Re: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Steve M. Robbins
• 2001/08/27 Bug#51411: marked as done (build-essential does not include debhelper) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/27 Bug#51412: marked as done (conflict in documents) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/26 This Weekends Sale... All Combo Pkg\\\'s $79.99 Spawn Devices
• 2001/08/26 error in chapter 9? smr
• 2001/08/23 [no subject] Antonio Gonzalez
• 2001/08/22 Are YOU looking for a new website, develop an existing site, cheaper hosting or domain names? Havealook at This
• 2001/08/22 CVS jdg: * Correct syntax error (sentence fragment missing) regarding the ldd debian-policy
• 2001/08/22 Bug#109672: debian-policy: Section "12.8.5 Packages providing fonts" point 6 is unclear. Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/22 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Steve Greenland
• 2001/08/22 misspelling of `comments' in policy section 9.4 Matt Kraai
• 2001/08/22 Bug#109672: debian-policy: Section "12.8.5 Packages providing fonts" point 6 is unclear. Eric Sharkey
• 2001/08/22 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/22 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Sebastian Rittau
• 2001/08/21 Bug#109432: marked as done (Section 9.6 should mention the case that a source package builds the library itself) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/20 Bug#109432: Section 9.6 should mention the case that a source package builds the library itself Adrian Bunk
• 2001/08/20 Re: Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/08/20 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/19 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/08/19 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Joey Hess
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft Marcelo E. Magallon
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft Neal H Walfield
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109182: marked as done (Removing more historical cruft) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft Chris Waters
• 2001/08/19 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Chris Waters
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Marco d'Itri
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Aaron Lehmann
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft Cesar Eduardo Barros
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Cesar Eduardo Barros
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Aaron Lehmann
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Anthony Towns
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Marco d'Itri
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Radovan Garabik
• 2001/08/19 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft Anthony Towns
• 2001/08/19 Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/19 Re: Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft Steve Kowalik
• 2001/08/18 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Joey Hess
• 2001/08/18 Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft Cesar Eduardo Barros
• 2001/08/18 Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Cesar Eduardo Barros
• 2001/08/18 Processed: Bug#100346: [ACCEPTED 2001-08-18] permitting shared versions of libraries to not exist Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#100346: ACCEPTED 2001-08-18] permitting shared versions of libraries to not exist Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/18 Bug#72335: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 10/6/2001] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#105538: marked as done (section C.2.3(in html format) has an incorrectly formated changelog example) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#53849: marked as done ([SEE 102204] emacs/tex downgrading to optional) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#102204: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 2001/07/11] Downgrade emacs/tex to optional) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#100631: marked as done ([AMMENDMENT 28/06/2001] Restrict http access to /usr/share/d=) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#109166: Policy has two parts called "Shared libraries" Josip Rodin
• 2001/08/18 Bug#60461: marked as done ([SEE 98291] FHS conformance not explicit) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#102199: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 2001/07/11] Next stage in usr/doc -> usr/share/doc transition) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#105535: marked as done (debian-policy should not be concerned with the internal structure of a source package) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#105625: marked as done (Spelling correction) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/18 Bug#98291: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 16/06/2001] Clarifying FHS policy) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/17 ACTIVADORES BIOLÓGICOS PARA ELIMINAR OLORES. ¡PUBLICIDAD! Clean World Hispania
• 2001/08/17 Boletín Informativo - Agosto 2001 GLOBALTECH CORP.
• 2001/08/16 Bug#100472: amendment accepted Andreas Bombe
• 2001/08/16 Processed: amendment accepted Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/16 Re: policy about spyware on debian Raul Miller
• 2001/08/16 policy about spyware on debian Eduardo Pérez Ureta
• 2001/08/15 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Anthony Towns
• 2001/08/15 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/15 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Steve Greenland
• 2001/08/15 Re: Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/08/13 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/13 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Anthony Towns
• 2001/08/13 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Jim Penny
• 2001/08/13 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/13 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Marcelo E. Magallon
• 2001/08/13 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Ben Collins
• 2001/08/13 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/13 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Brian May
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Anthony Towns
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Ben Collins
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Raul Miller
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Taketoshi Sano
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Anthony Towns
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Anthony Towns
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Marcelo E. Magallon
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/12 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Ben Collins
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Ben Collins
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Chris Waters
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Chris Waters
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Josip Rodin
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Chris Waters
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Ben Collins
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Sebastian Rittau
• 2001/08/11 Bug#100346: [AMENDMENT 2001-07-30] permitting shared versions of libraries to not exist Branden Robinson
• 2001/08/11 Processed: [AMENDMENT 2001-07-30] permitting shared versions of libraries to not exist Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/08/11 Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated Sebastian Rittau
• 2001/08/10 Your Vacation Winning michael1412
• 2001/07/31 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Raul Miller
• 2001/07/31 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Richard Braakman
• 2001/07/31 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Branden Robinson
• 2001/07/30 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Jason Gunthorpe
• 2001/07/30 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/07/30 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/07/30 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Raul Miller
• 2001/07/30 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Richard Braakman
• 2001/07/30 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Florian Weimer
• 2001/07/29 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Brian May
• 2001/07/29 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Branden Robinson
• 2001/07/29 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Richard Braakman
• 2001/07/29 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Branden Robinson
• 2001/07/28 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Glenn
• 2001/07/28 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Branden Robinson
• 2001/07/28 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Adam Heath
• 2001/07/28 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/07/28 Bug#100346: seconding this proposal Branden Robinson
• 2001/07/28 Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion Andreas Bombe
• 2001/07/28 Processed: Re: Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/07/27 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/07/27 Bug#106826: Mandate 64-bit file support for file utilities Ben Collins
• 2001/07/27 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Adam Heath
• 2001/07/27 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/07/27 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/07/27 Bug#106826: Mandate 64-bit file support for file utilities Florian Weimer
• 2001/07/27 Bug#106826: Mandate 64-bit file support for file utilities Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/07/27 Bug#106826: Mandate 64-bit file support for file utilities Florian Weimer
• 2001/07/27 URGENT BUSINESS PROPOSAL dele williams
• 2001/07/27 Re: packages without .md5sums file? Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/07/27 packages without .md5sums file? Massimo Dal Zotto
• 2001/07/26 Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion Robert Woodcock
• 2001/07/26 Re: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Paul Slootman
• 2001/07/26 Re: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Adam Heath
• 2001/07/26 Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/07/26 Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion Enrique Zanardi
• 2001/07/26 Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/07/26 Bug#100472: PROPOSAL] allowing '-' between libraryname and soversion Enrique Zanardi
• 2001/07/26 Re: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Paul Slootman
• 2001/07/25 Re: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Adam Heath
• 2001/07/25 CVS jdg: * Add Uploaders field to debian/control debian-policy
• 2001/07/25 Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.6.0 Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/07/25 debian-policy_3.5.6.0_i386.changes INSTALLED Debian Installer
• 2001/07/25 Processed: Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.6.0 Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/07/24 CVS srivasta: Do not separate the target of an ID ref debian-policy
• 2001/07/24 CVS srivasta: * Change footnote about urgency values to the now-current list: low, debian-policy
• 2001/07/24 Processed: Status of some accepted proposals Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/07/24 Bug#106280: packages shouldn't have to ask permission before calling MAKEDEV in postinst Herbert Xu
• 2001/07/24 Bug#106280: packages shouldn't have to ask permission before calling MAKEDEV in postinst Brian May
• 2001/07/23 Bug#106280: packages shouldn't have to ask permission before calling MAKEDEV in postinst Anthony Towns
• 2001/07/23 Bug#106073: separate doc packages should not be unpacked to /usr/share/doc/[package]-doc/ Warren Turkal
• 2001/07/23 Bug#106280: packages shouldn't have to ask permission before calling MAKEDEV in postinst Paul Slootman
• 2001/07/23 The best China Suppliers longf
• 2001/07/22 Ãîòîâûå ôèðìû (Ìîñêâà)... ADMIN
• 2001/07/22 Processed: clean-upgs Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/07/21 ÏÐÎÄÀÆÀ ÞÐÈÄÈ×ÅÑÊÈÕ ÀÄÐÅÑΠÃÎÐÎÄÀ ÌÎÑÊÂÛ!!! Ïåðìèíîâ Èâàí
• 2001/07/21 Bug#106073: separate doc packages should not be unpacked to /usr/share/doc/[package]-doc/ Santiago Vila
• 2001/07/21 Bug#106073: separate doc packages should not be unpacked to /usr/share/doc/[package]-doc/ Anthony Towns
• 2001/07/21 Bug#106073: separate doc packages should not be unpacked to /usr/share/doc/[package]-doc/ Santiago Vila
• 2001/07/20 Bug#106073: separate doc packages should not be unpacked to /usr/share/doc/[package]-doc/ Warren Turkal
• 2001/07/18 Bug#105753: debian-policy: missing reference to dh-make-perl in perl-policy Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/07/18 Bug#105753: debian-policy: missing reference to dh-make-perl in perl-policy Loic Dachary
• 2001/07/18 Re: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Brendan O'Dea
• 2001/07/18 Re: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Raul Miller
• 2001/07/18 Re: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Mike A. Harris
• 2001/07/18 Re: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/07/18 RE: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Mike A. Harris
• 2001/07/17 RE: calling MAKEDEV from postinst Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/07/17 calling MAKEDEV from postinst Paul Slootman
• 2001/07/17 Bug#105625: Spelling correction Mikael Hedin

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]