Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I hereby second this proposal. > > The original proposer did not supply any proposed textual changes to > policy, so I suggest the following as replacement text for the first > paragraph of 11.2:
Thanks. I'm not familiar with the policy revision process. Is there some documentation for it? | The shared version must be compiled with -fPIC, and the static version must | not be. In other words, each *.c file will need to be compiled twice. IMHO, it makes sense to drop this C reference as well, if we are in the process of changing the section. In addition, there are some architectures where all code is position independent, so -fPIC is a noop, and others, where -fPIC is less efficient then -fpic. OTOH, the additions look okay to me. > If the original submitter (Florian Weimer) objects to the above language, > please speak up. I'm glad someone picked this up who has more experience in this field. ;-) -- Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Stuttgart http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/ RUS-CERT +49-711-685-5973/fax +49-711-685-5898
