On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:58:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:19:37PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Uh, you're using musts for the wrong thing again. Packages aren't going > > to get thrown out of the distro because of dodgy descriptions, even if > > they're absolutely, unambiguously in the wrong. > > Where did I say package descriptions "MUST" be accurate? > > Please re-read my mail. > > I said they "MUST" not duplicate the short description of another > package, and that they "MUST" not exceed 80 characters total.
So the description for gcc-2.95 is not the same as the one for gcc-3.0? Likewise for shared library's of differing soversions? Ben -- .----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----. / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
