On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 10:38:49PM -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: > I have only one thing to add to that list: traceroute should be moved, _not_ > to > /usr/bin as lots of people claim, but to /bin . It's as necessary and useful > as > ping to diagnose networking trouble, and /usr might be mounted via NFS through > a gateway -- exactly what we want to diagnose. Same for the ipv6 versions of > ping and traceroute.
In that case, you'd use "ping ga.te.wa.y" to check if the gateway's up, and "ping nfs.se.rv.er" to check if your NFS server is up. If either wasn't up, you'd call networking support, and find out what's going on, since you'd be rather insane to mount /usr from somewhere remote that you don't have control over. Moving traceroute at all has the same problems no matter where it's too, anyway. /sbin is no either than /bin or /usr/bin. ping6 is already in /bin, btw. This isn't a policy matter anyway: it only affects one package (traceroute), so it's something to take up with the maintainer. Personally, I wouldn't, since I don't think the above adds anything particularly profound to the debate. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
pgpPL5eR4yFUw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
